this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
466 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

9517 readers
1612 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snowman_sir@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Ask where the exit to building is. RUN!

[–] Curiousaur@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 13 hours ago

Good thing there's a red box around the important part, I almost missed it.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 106 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

He got his answers.

Salary: Minimum

Responsibilities: Maximum

Work culture: Toxic

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 5 points 8 hours ago

And that's why you should always ask about those things 😅

[–] capnbubblebuns@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

So basically every job that exists

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 199 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 54 points 21 hours ago

Like fucking Neo.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 38 points 19 hours ago

In my region, failure to disclose salary on the job description is illegal.

It's a DEI law, since hard salary negotiation supposedly favours one group over another, and for us that's a hard law to fight with a huge compensation cap.

So the employer already comes off as a sleazeball.

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 78 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I can get that the employer would want to dodge any salary discussion, but not even responsibilities and work culture? Does the position even say what is the job?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 47 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"Come join our ever growing family if you enjoy fast pace work environments and every day being something new to discover!"

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"Everything is always on fire and we have no plans to change the systemic causes of this, but we do sometimes get drunk and cheat on our spouses with each other."

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

taking notes And how many sleep with you coworker functions are there every year?

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 17 hours ago

#StrongerTogether
#OneFamily
#PizzaWednesday

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Tipping their hand that they didn't put at least a ballpark salary range in the listing, meaning they're trying to fuck you.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

No responsibilities in the position description usually means "literally everything is going to roll downhill to your desk whenever someone feels like not doing their work".

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago

Fun fact: posting a job ad without a salary range isn’t even legal in California for any business that has more than something like 10 employees.

[–] nqua@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

Some jobs are "buffer hires" (look it up) some jobs are "beeing the scapegoat for the real culprit at a higher position", either one wouldnt be really discussed in a regular interview.

when they dont want to discuss important basic things in the interview just pick your favorite one and ask if its such a position, but if you do, plz report how it went.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 50 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I’m just kind of stunned by the “summarize this email” button. It’s 3 sentences!

[–] f314@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah.. I saw this on a technical blog post for developers the other day and almost bust a blood vessel

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 44 points 20 hours ago

"Read with my fucking eyes"

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Can they add a button "understand this for me"? I don't feel like a summary is reducing my effort enough. /s

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago

"get fucked"

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Do people regularly get emails long enough to justify a summary button? I think I've seen those maybe once out every thousand emails I get.

Or is it summarizing the whole thread?

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I do, but that's because I subscribe to hobby newsletters that tend to run long. I wouldn't use a summary button because I want every bit of that content.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Not regularly, but sometimes I'll come back to work after a few days off, and find one of those threads of 200 emails pinging around chaotically.

In those cases, I'm happy to let Copilot try and figure out what the hell was going on. Worst case it gives me a dogshit summary and I'm no worse off.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Cheap rage bait.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

This is fake.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

This is fake/satire... No one is going to tell you cannot ask about responsibilities

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago

sounds professional - is the very opposite. you were lucky