this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
475 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

20594 readers
1495 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube thumbnail

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In the future, please link directly to the article or video as the main link.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Noted, thank you.

Edit: I flipped them around

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago
[–] brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca 27 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I think we really should stick to calling him “Prince Andrew.” If we don’t we’re letting the monarchy separate itself from him…but that’s bullshit; he has the privilege of being a prince and his status as prince is not just what gave him the liberty to be a monster, but I think we can assume it’s what actually made him a monster.

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

The Andrew formerly known as a prince.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I heard a very interesting argument that if the Royal family can remove Andrew from the line of succession, then the line itself can be manipulated, and anyone else could be added. In that case, what is the point of having a royal family?

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Seems a little threadbare as a theory.

People have been adding other people to royal families for the entirety of recorded history.

Sometimes its through marriage, but sometimes its adoption, sometimes they just make up a lineage.

Now, theres arguments against royalty, for sure, but if the royal family wasn't allowed to prune itself, find the best people and merge them into the royal family, etc, there never would've been royals in the first place. Royal families begin with individuals but they remain by caring about "good breeding" (and other ways of consolidating power).

Consolidating is the real purpose. It can be obscured with religious lines of divinity, or what have you, but royal families are always shopping for people to incorporate.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Eh… I have mixed feelings on that.

Firstly, I don’t think his position made him a monster. I absolutely think it made it easier to become one, but there are plenty of opportunistic pedophiles who aren’t princes. In fact I don’t think it’s a far stretch to say the vast majority aren’t princes

Secondly, correct me if I’m wrong but hasn’t the majority of his privilege been stripped from him? Yeah, he can still visit royal places and such, but doesn’t he have about the same “power” as an in law or something?

There’s also the question of if the monarchy enabled his actions. Though, again I admit they may not have done enough after learning of his actions.

As a Canadian who never really paid attention to British royalty, this feels a lot like blaming a family for one member committing a mass murder. But that could just be a lack of understanding on my part.

[–] Ikon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Well when the family has a long history of mass murder....

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

The pedophile traitor deserves a single finger salute and tell him to fetch his own beer.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 4 points 15 hours ago

Should be calling him by a number

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The only good royal is dead royal.

Being a monarch or nobility of any kind is a crime against humanity. And yes, this applies to all, no exceptions. I don't care how "constitutional" a monarch is. No one should have inheritable legal status or power. Inherited wealth is bad enough. Every king or noble should have to give up their title or give up their head.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 20 hours ago

Sir Pedophile

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't post pictures of headlines. Link to the article

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

People are very negative but they don't understand the house of windsor and how tradional it is. What else is traditional. The stockades.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's particularly hilarious that for all the talk of tradition, the house of "Windsor" was a name chosen during WWI, barely more than a century ago. The original name was "Saxe-Coburg and Gotha", but somewhat awkwardly German bombers built by Gothaer Waggonfabrik and popularly known as "Gothas" happened to be dropping explosives on London.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

why did they not go with saxe-cokburg?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

To answer your query specifically, Saxe-Cokburg would have been more honest for a bunch of Anglo-Saxons

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

on hindsite I wish I had used an x but then again it would duplicative of saxe. still. can't have enough x.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

yeah i'm still waiting for them to bring back volcano sauce too

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago

Okay, citizen Andrew Windsor-Mountbatten.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol ok sure, Andrew formerly known as Prince

[–] DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The thing about "prince" is that it's halfway to "nonce"

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Where is he interacting with royal staff these days?

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A huge piece of shit in almost every respect, but the character had his moments of poignancy.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 4 points 23 hours ago

a POS, but a good politician and he had his principles. not many lanisters could claim that much...

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am no true king.

You do the math. ;)

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Right. You're a potato.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Yes, sir. Flagon of ale for the child rapist, sir. And absolutely nobody has done anything untoward in it, sir".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

His staff are on record as saying they call him "the cunt" when he's not around. I forget which interview that was but it was a former staff member on a TV interview.

[–] CreativeCider@feddit.org 7 points 21 hours ago

Seen it, I think it was an interview with one of the security staff

[–] Ash@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd literally tell him to "fuck off I'll call you Nonce Andrew, and if you threaten me I'll go to the press and tell them even more shit that will get you in prison, you fucking nonce. Now get on your knees and apologise. And then I'd film it, and send it to the press"

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Racist fucks doing racist fuckery

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Same as it ever was

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why does this fucker get royal staff?

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 36 points 1 day ago

He's still uber rich. Between being mummy's favourite and being the literal shaddy deal's man for the British government for a while, he probably has more money than he would be able to spend.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (11 children)

It stands for "Sweat Isn't Real"

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

Here is your beer “Sir” …

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is getting used to it I guess. "Sir" is a pretty big demotion from "your royal highness".

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

man I'd love to try "Ah yes your pedoness" just once

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This Saxon Royalist shit heap deserves to be buried in an unmarked grave. Ideally without building a parking lot over his insipid pedophilic corpse so as to deny him even identification after centuries of disgraced death.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›