this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
460 points (91.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38213 readers
4679 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn’t “fooled by AI” but simply gooning the Inox Beretta 92 compact.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

With the jank-ass safety lever and the top grip screw in the wrong place?

Don't worry, I have a worse one you can look at. Here you go.

[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

i see the watermark but is this actually a generated image? I'm normally good at being able to tell. this image feels fine to me though? like the reflections on the light switch cover and on the picture frame feel natural. the keyboard looks correct. i guess the vents on the slightly stubbly crt are a bit wonky and the calendar can't decide between 1998 and 1958 lol

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

it's messy AF, but lines up with 98 which it kinda looks like it was trying to print. I'm actually a little scared with this one, it's a lot less obvious that previous generations.

People mention the gun was wrong, but that's outside my wheel house.

The monitors badge is not any name that existed back then and they gave it a trinitron tube.

The task bar button for the error window is WAY too wide.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

March started on a Sunday in '98, though.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

ahh crap, totally right. I was looking at it as a monday index for god knows why... it matches 99, but is def not 99 in display so the closeness is just by chance.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Must be 1948, which makes sense because that was before restarting the computer was invented, so if it crashed the only option was to put it out of its misery and get a new one. They had them in vending machines for $3.50.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The lighting on the gun is completely mismatched from the image and tipped me off pretty quick.

[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

is it though? looks like it's reflecting the camera flash to me

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

There's a friggin' drop shadow on her arm and the gun as if somebody made this in Microsoft Word. The shadow falling across the corner of the computer tower wouldn't line up with the part on the wall and bookshelf like that, not to mention the edge of the door frame.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Check out the noise on the computer screen which magically disappears over the dialog box. Gotta say though, lighting and everything else looks dead on, just the details.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

it could be an error over an ATI tuner window, but they liked to show blue when there was no signal. The taskbar button for the window is really wide and that's a sony trinitron tube with a namebadge that didn't really exist back then

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think I see what you mean now, it was worded confusingly. That taskbar button is too wide though.

[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

yeah i agree that the computer screen doesn't make sense. but like it's not a dead giveaway imo. like if this picture was organic, maybe these people chose an image that didn't make technical sense because it wasn't too important for the photos composition. you know what i mean? like this is scary close to being indistinguishable from some old photograph and i hate it :p

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Just the thumbnail and I wouldn’t even question it. Scary times.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I did this to epic on my charge nurses computer last night and she thought it was magic. I've made it clear that I will provide these and many other services to the charge nurse as long as I don't ever have to actually do it personally (I don't want to have to explain to other adults what their job is). Thus the balance is maintained.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

someone told her about chatgpt

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

I would like to think that the timeline we are currently in would have been terminated had she pulled the trigger.

[–] thomasdouwes@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fuck, this one got me. I didn't see the watermark. Even looking closely the details don't seem AI, the floppy disks on the table, the cup, the keyboard colouring, the phone wire. Even the numbers on the calendar seem plausible with the bad compression. I hate this doubting every picture I see on the internet

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Damn. Even now that I know I'm struggling to find anything that could've shown me. Some things are a bit wonky, like the pants, the calendar, the background. But none of it would be enough to truly convince me if I hadn't seen the watermark. Most of it is easily waved away with the fact that the image is blurry. And details like the books, the screen, parts of the calendar and basically everything else in the image scream "real image" to me.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

I know it goes against the general consensus in here, but I think the image itself is real, was likely low quality because it's 25-30 years old, and the Gemini watermark is because someone ran it through to upscale it.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

In the 90s, March did start with a Monday in '93 and '99. But it's unlikely you'd see TV static (with a decently emulated camera shutter effect) behind an error dialog window - is it the desktop background?

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago

The weird hair colour could just be unnatural lighting.
Most other things could be chalked up to JPEG (although the calendar numbering seems like a stretch - I have never seen jpeg make a '3' look like a '1' in that specific way).
What gave me the highest suspicion was the jeans. The stitched parts (mainly the zip part) doesn't look like real stitching, but like painted plastic. So unless there is some product that is actually plastic pants, printed with a jeans texture, that's not a real picture.

And once you know it is AI, it explains the background.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ghost in the shell? Meet 5.56x45 in the shell.

[–] Captain_CapsLock@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Not even a joke, I went to a military simulation event dressed as this woman, equipped with an airsoft m16. I shaved for the first time in 10 years, wore a wig, and a gray suit/dress that I had thrifted. I was " Barb from Accounting".

[–] jrnmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Looks a bit like Scully lol

[–] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Because it is

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 5 points 20 hours ago

Hey, the screen is not the computer!

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 56 points 1 day ago (11 children)

This is the most 90s image I have seen in a long time.

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good job clanker, another human fooled successfully. See the watermark in the bottom right.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago

Fuck me... I only started looking more closely after your comment and noticed that the room's proportions are fucked up. But, at a first glance, it looks like a photo from the 90s...

[–] diskremover@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I wanna cry man, I wanna cry. HOW LONG do i have to ask myself "Is this AI?" whenever I see an image on internet?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

They even got the shadow on the wall from the camera flash...

Edit: also, the computer instructed to make this image was probably like "Hmmm. Mental note"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago

Sarah Connor at home:

load more comments
view more: next ›