this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
607 points (99.0% liked)

News

36292 readers
2736 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

S. app uninstalls of ChatGPT’s mobile app jumped 295% day-over-day on Saturday, February 28, as consumers responded to the news of OpenAI’s deal with the Department of Defense (DoD), which has been rebranded under the Trump administration as the Department of War.

This data, which comes from market intelligence provider Sensor Tower, represents a sizable increase compared with ChatGPT’s typical day-over-day uninstall rate of 9%, as measured over the past 30 days.

Meanwhile, U.S. downloads for OpenAI competitor Anthropic’s Claude jumped up by 37% day-over-day on Friday, February 27, and 51% as of Saturday, February 28, after the company announced that it would not partner with the U.S. defense department. Anthropic said it was not able to agree on the deal terms over concerns that AI would be used to surveil Americans and be used in fully autonomous weaponry, which AI is not yet ready to do safely.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iglou@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Anthropic said it was not able to agree on the deal terms over concerns that AI would be used to surveil Americans and be used in fully autonomous weaponry, which AI is not yet ready to do safely.

To add to this, Anthropic also said (in other words I do not recall) that even if AI could do it safely, there would be ethical concerns about oversight.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys have it installed on your phone?? Lord in heaven

Why not just fedex Altman your SSN and mother's maiden name to save yourself the trouble lmfao

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People's phones are my nightmare. I don't want to know and i don't want to see

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Whenever I accidentally see someone else’s phone it haunts me

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am not subscribed to openai. Is there a way for me to not subscribe even harder?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd say pirate it but well cloud based and all kinda takes the wind from those sails.

[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ai piracy is still possible! Break into the openai servers and yoink the gpt 5.2 weights. and then publish them

[–] ultrafastsloth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Why would you break in, the AI is Open, is in the name. Just walk in duh

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 0 points 1 day ago

Why bother when you have GLM 5.0 😎

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fuck the game up. America makes terrorists and school shooters, and it's often on purpose, so be careful and understand the game.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whenever I see a % data, I always believe the actual amount is really low. It just means on Saturday there were 4x the amount of uninstalls compared to every other day, which doesn’t seem much at all

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it’s enough to be indicative

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you have the base amount. And still, for a company of this size, it’s not much

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

% is % is %… absolutes are completely irrelevant… 1m people uninstalling facebook is less relevant than 100 people uninstalling

a large % change is always relevant no matter the company size. that’s the whole point

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It’s not a % change of the entire user base, it’s a % change over the uninstalls. If there are 100 uninstalls per day for example, even a 2000% increase for a day is worthless

And even then, we probably need the number of installs per day to understand the actual impact

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

For statistics like this you need more information to know whether it's significant. If they have 100m users and 5 people uninstall the app daily, it's not going to make any difference if that number goes up to 15 uninstalls for one day.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Indeed, without an error estimated from fluctuations, etc I cannot conclude how significative it was such...

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I convinced two friends to cancel their monthly sub. I guess that's something.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

Every little bit counts

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What really sucks is Google is likely to remove all those 1 star reviews, they've done it before when shit like this happens.

Edit: i feel like a good review could be...

1 star. By using this service you'll be helping ChatGPT autonomously surveil you through the government and murder you with robots without any human in the loop. Don't let ChatGPT kill you!

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn’t have a subscription but I still deleted my account.

[–] cutemarshmallow@europe.pub 10 points 1 day ago

How people have one is beyond me, both from a moral and a financial point of view.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm surprised so many people were paying for it. Seems like more people want less ai not more these days.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget we are in a perception bubble here.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, but of that many people are already paying and they are still burning through billions, it's even more of a bubble than I thought. The chance of.profitability with direct to consumer is less likely.

So clearly it will be mainly corporate and enshittified versions going forward.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People want less forced AI, but most people are fine with using it whenever they want

I’m one of them

But then I’m a student and work part time as a dev so I see the population that pretty much uses GenAI the most

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 8 points 1 day ago

Many of us are in our own little bubble. Nearly all regular folk use AI instead of Google now.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Some people are really deep in the sauce

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

I've switched to Mistral. It's not quite on the same level of performance but certainly worth not being on a American dubious setup.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Deepseek. Take my data Xi. Please liberate us from our pedophilic ruling class. Please bring us high speed rail. Amen.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm-doing-my-part.gif

(I seem to have lost the ability to embed gifs.)

I did it too and for that reason (dod contract)

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How are they tracking uninstalls?

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably play store / app store metrics

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I had no idea that data was public

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Its almost always public when it comes to google.

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I believe third party analytic tools and other forms of research help news agencies report this kinda stuff, but also for the likes of google they could just probably buy the data from them

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

But the fewer people who use it the less money they'll lose

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

i don't have app, but may install to prop the uninstall numbers

[–] doesit@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Copilot says these are ethical alternatives

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

copilot isnt even recommending himself. he knows he sucks 😔

[–] doesit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It's dangerous when we start calling it a he/she.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 day ago

Ehhh. If they weren’t paying customers then it’ll certainly help their burn rate.