this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
303 points (94.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48253 readers
1348 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m in recovery and ever commercial is “the bold refreshing taste of uncle berry lemon twist vodka. Having a bad day? Drink this. You know you want to. Drink it Michael! please drink responably

Every ad portrays drinking as a party, and your in a pool throwing a beach ball with your friends, and your ex Chrissy finally admits she was wrong. It’s an unrealistically positive. If you drink Tito’s your father in law will finally grow close to you. It’s not Christmas without even Williams egg nog!

There is no safe amount of alcohol to drink. It is like cigarettes, entirely bad for you.

I’m not saying don’t sell it but why is every add for booze being blasted every. Especially to me because the algorithm knows I’m an alcoholic.

How is that legal?

Please drink responsibly? You’re aiming your ads at alcoholics primarily.

It’s like advertising morphine on skid row. You know what you’re doing.

Edit: for the people saying I’m America centric. I have a Texas education.what the hell is the US? Nothing is beyond our boarders. We are the only land mass. Ill add a picture in the comments.

For the people who happily explained what it’s like in thier country. Makes me feel less crazy for pointing out the problem!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 127 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It took decades of fighting to get smoking banned, and if everyone and their uncle didn't have a parent dying of lung cancer, it probably wouldn't have happened.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 15 points 1 month ago
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 45 points 1 month ago (8 children)

basically alcohol gets a pass because its a drug that has been in use since the stone age. Im a big "victimless" crimes person and I would like to see much legalized but I would like them all put into a category where its allowed at home or at licensed establishments and advertising is limited to private residences or at businesses that are in the category. I would restrict the signage for the businesses to. So the brothel, race track, casino, dispensiary, liquor store would look rather non descript from the outside but all would have controlled entry to only allow adults and inside it would likely be filled with ads for other establishments.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with everything. I want to add, a lot of drugs have been used since the stone ages. Animals, not just humans, tend to use drugs fairly commonly. It's only a modern thing to think they're purely bad.

With that said, modern drugs often remove them from their cultural context, and are in higher purities and larger quantities than are naturally available. Chewing on a coca leaf is a lot different than doing cocaine, even though they're largely the same thing (though the coca leaf has a lot of stuff that's removed in processing to make cocaine). Cultures where it's common, it doesn't cause nearly the same issues as cocaine does in other places, because they don't have the same culture around it and are sometimes getting a lot more.

I agree though; people should be allowed to do what they want. The government shouldn't be deciding it for them, and neither should advertising. They should be free from pressure either way to decide what they want to put into their body.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah its kinda wild that cocaine was in coke but and there is nothing about mass withdrawls when it was taken out. It was a small amount and ingested though and who knows how it was obtained form the leaf at that time. I had a convo with an indian coworker around this topic and they mentioned their grandma chewing something that was like the basis of opium and it was just normal back then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a whole lot of victims of alcohol tho

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I agree with all that but is lime to see a tax on it to fund treatment centers.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not sure where you live, but I think basically every state in the USA has an extra tax on alcohol.

Look up "sin tax"

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

I don't think much, or any, of that is going to recovery programs though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheLugal@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (15 children)

We don't, alcohol adverts are just as illegal as tobacco. Of course; that might not be the case everywhere on the planet :P

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Bit of a shot in the dark, but seems like cigarette companies have lied in front of congress / courts saying cigarettes are healthy / not bad for you and have been caught red handed in their lies.

Big alcohol hasn't ever done anything that egregious. Everyone knows its not exactly healthy to drink, and Big Alcohol doesn't seem to have ever argued that. I know there's the occasional "a glass of red wine is good for your heart" stuff, but they're also not making any attempt to deny a gallon of wine per day will probably cause cirrhosis, ya know?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 30 points 1 month ago

Just adding. The liquor industry has been pushing the 'drink responsibly' line for decades. Back in the day they tried to get an AA member to sign on as a spokesperson but AA asked the member not to do it and they agreed.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Just FYI, the 1 glass a day study didn't exclude ex alcoholics, so they polluted the zero-glass-a-day group with bad health making the 1-glass-a-day look healthier in comparison.

The study has been redone and it shows that the less alcohol you consume the better it is, no exceptions.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Well, there are places where it is illegal. EU for example.

But of course they get around that by advertising their "0.0%" beers etc.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That loophole is closed in Norway at least.

Can’t even advertise for a Heineken T-shirt if you wanted to

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 19 points 1 month ago

They have better ~~bribers~~ lobbyists

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

You know when you see an advertisement for a casino, and they have a picture of a guy winning money? That's false advertising, because that happens the least. That's like if you're advertising a hamburger, they could show a guy choking. "This is what happened once."

Mitch Hedberg

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Similarly, why are they allowed to advertise every fancy new and half untested medicine out there?

Like, take such and such drug to eliminate pimples, but possible side effects are hair loss, heart attack, brain bleeding, rectal leakage, miscarriage, loss of fingernails and toenails, blah blah...

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ask your doctor if Nwxalviva is right for you

"Yeah, I know you went through 8 years of med school and internships and have years and years of experience and ongoing education, but I heard part of a 30 second commercial playing in the background so I think I'm pretty well qualified to make this suggestion to you..."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One thing you see in the alcohol adds, no one ever actually drinks on screen.

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I am aware of that. I just don’t see that as “problem solved” when they show a nice bourbon being poured onto clear ice.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 month ago

A few reasons.

First, the alcohol industry has been a lot more sensitive to being perceived as selling to kids than the tobacco industry was. Because of it, there was never the push to ban advertising and conduct a mass media effort to control teen drinking as there was teen smoking.

Second, people still remember prohibition in the USA and how it was a failure. So, you've got a lot of people worried about a slippery slope in comparison to tobacco.

Third, the alcohol industry is far better at lobbying around specific items that would actually prevent consumption. For instance, alcoholic beverages don't need to show nutritional information. It will bend in a way that keeps access open.

[–] John_CalebBradberton@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I spend a lot of time in Ireland and tbh I can't remember the last time I saw an ad for regular alcoholic drinks like beers and whiskeys.. However a lot of these companies skirt around rules, at least here at the moment, by making ads about non alcoholic versions instead. So you see a lot of Guinness 0.0 and Heineken 0.0 etc.

Tbh even that should banned at this stage too.

What's worse though is gambling advertising. I fucking hate that shit so much. Its popularity preys on desperate people and further drives the K shaped economy we are seeing nowadays. Its so fucked up.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Gambling ads and sponsorships are crippling the youth. I know lads coming out of school in debt to loads of people to be down the bookies.

The zero ads are a workaround but I wouldnt be so annoyed if they were a different price at the tap!

I would miss the guiness ads but they aren't even Irish anymore so fuck em.

load more comments (2 replies)

Advertising is weaponized pollution. All of it. In any shape or form. It is littering and spreading garbage for profit.

Bill Hicks had an excellent suggestion for those in that industry.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

all advertisement is bad. best to avoid all of it. use the fediverse, don't use commercial internet platforms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The proof that there is only Texas as promised.

(For those that didn’t see the comments about assuming everyone is American. This explains the Texas education system.

Btw no one in Texas calls it “the gulf of America “ we thinks that’s stupid to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

r/USdefaultism

is what I'd say if this were reddit lol

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Canada has aboot 40 million people, the UK has about 70 million, Australia has 30 million, and New Zealand (5 million) is basically a rounding error. Since the US has over 300 million people, other English speakers tend to migrate to primarily US platforms.

What I find most interesting about these statistics is the difference in population density between the UK and the USA. Although the US is ~40 times larger, it only contains 7x more people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In Russia, alcohol ads are banned. So, beer ads take all the air, rolling their usual, and adding a small fast "nonalcoholic" at the end for their obscure nonalcolohic version no one cares about.

So, effectively, advertising your beer is legal as long as you have a nonalcoholic version.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think about this with grocery stores. All you want is some cereal and there's a giant aisle of temptation people have to walk through

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

But we still sell cigarettes and we could still sell alcohol. Just don’t advertise it on tv and such.

As for addiction I disagree (I smoke) I stoped smoking for 2 years before my divorce. I never could stop drinking.

On top of that you (though it’s very difficult mentally” you could go from a pack a day to zero in one day without negative effects. I’ve done it once before.

Alcohol… I decided I needed to quit drinking a well ago, but I have to wait for a bed at a treatment center before I can quite. Otherwise I’ll die…

I think drinking is pretty dangerous.

“No body smoke occasionally “ paraphrasing of course.

Yes they absolutely do. “I only smoke when I drink “ is a very common thing. Lots of people only smoke when they get stressed.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Money. Cigarette ads were justly banned. The Marlboro Man and Joe Camel were iconic brands. The latter was designed specifically to encourage kids to smoke. As a kid, I thought Joe Camel was cool as shit. I didn't want to smoke because of him, but I liked his vibe. (It wasn't lost on me that his head was shaped like a penis; that was an intentional design choice, but he was still a cool dude.) That said, when I turned 18 and I tried smoking, I bought a pack of Camel filters, but that was because it was my mom's brand. I tried like two. Decided it wasn't for me. My mom's only beef was that I bought a hard pack — she always bought soft packs. I never got that. Anyway, she got 18 smokes for free, and even back when they were $1.50 a pack, that was a heck of a deal. (Fortunately she did not make me chain smoke the rest of them. I learned my lesson. Plus, I was 18.)

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

It is always so weird traveling outside of Norway and see commercials for alcohol.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've always found it weird that alcohol doesn't have warning labels. At least not where I live. I guess the risks are common knowledge but we can say the same for cigarettes

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And how there's no requirements to show ingredients/calories per 100ml, despite it being required on all other foodstuffs. And imagine if they had disgusting pictures on beer cans saying "don't drink and drive" or such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Alcohol is bad, but smoking is worse.
Smoking is both way more addictive and it is a bigger health risk.
It's rare to be a moderate smoker, generally you either don't smoke at all, or if you do you are a smoker, with numerous health risks.
With alcohol moderate use is the norm, and only excessive use will make you an alcoholic, resulting in numerous health risks.

AFAIK it has only lately become known that even moderate alcohol use is still a health risk. AFAIK mostly causing intestine cancer.
So instead we have campaigns warning against drinking to much, which was also how it started with cigarettes.

load more comments
view more: next ›