this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
526 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29907 readers
2488 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Every Republican politican is complicit in keeping this lunatic in power.

Never forget.

[–] 1D10@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

And every republican voter.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's because their power is an inverted house of cards, like all Fascist governments.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean... this goes for democrats as well. I don't see them doing anything to change the situation.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

at this point they don't have the numbers for anything.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean even if they did, we'd just see them rolling over for the Republicans anyway. You know like they've done for the last 2-3 decades.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That meets my expectations, sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never forget.

if only, it's like america's superpower.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If only there was some sort of protocol for this situation

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago

It would take an act of congress to devise such a protocol

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

Idk what I'm supposed to do with the advice of dozens of mental health experts. Anyone with the ego to run for President of the United States is arguably mentally unstable to begin with. Trump's always been a degenerate little freak. And now he's a senile degenerate freak.

But he's hardly the first President in US history to suffer from Old Person Brain and get shepherded around by a gaggle of scheming viziers while the country crumbles around them. What is anyone going to do about it? The Senate is packed with people exactly as senile and corrupt and petty as Trump. And nothing in the next election cycle seems like it will change that.

Hell, Democrats were working kinda-sorta hard to put an 80-year-old woman into Susan Collin's Senate seat barely more than a week ago. In NC, they're running Roy Cooper at 68 years young. Meanwhile, 73 year old Sherrod Brown is looking to reclaim his Ohio seat for another six years. These are the Fresh New Faces we're supposed to rally behind to defeat the Trump Gerontocracy?

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed. We've had multiple wake-up calls that we don't have any guardrails against an unstable President, and we've done nothing about it. I mean technically we have guardrails. But the reality is our elected officials are a bunch of feckless cowards who value being in power more than they value wielding it responsibly. And since impeaching a President is tantamount to a nuclear bomb enema, politically speaking, no one is willing.

We are electing the fundamentally wrong sorts of people. It's not just age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Status quo right? Fuck old pricks I'm 51 and hate a majority of my peers

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

62 here. Ditto.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The letter, entered by Senators Whitehouse and Reed of Rhode Island on April 30, represents an unusually direct intervention by medical experts spanning conservative and liberal ideologies, multiple religions, and diverse backgrounds. The press release announcing this action was published Tuesday night (May 5).

It's rare to read that in published form. A potential problem is that it may be useful to someone near Trump for him to remain there. Perhaps Vance, perhaps Vought, perhaps someone else, or a group of them. I don't believe Trump is making these continually bad and harmful decisions on his own. "The power behind the throne."

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Vance wants him to stay in through next year. He wants to be the longest serving president since Roosevelt.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. If vance can get trump over Day 713 then he has 10 years to dismantle voting and term limits.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure Theil also supports that plan. He wants his puppet to have maximum power for as long as possible.

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't it interesting we don't read much about him in the news? Author of a section of Project 2025, and director of the US Office of Management and Budget. "Follow the money"?

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

why was I thinking about "The Boys" lol

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I gave up TV somewhere around 2011, so wasn't aware of "Vought International" of The Boys. Sorry.

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Also, dozens of astronomers have testified that the sun is bright and yellow, and is visible during the day.

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which means it's always visible, since it's always day somewhere.

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Big if true.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'd been wondering what the bright yellow thing in the sky was

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

This is as useful and effective as:

"Dozens of security experts testify that Windows 11 with Copilot is spyware and must not be used."

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

And those experts will be classified as having the bullshit thing the cons call "TDS" in a classic conservative, "no, you!" retort.

I would note that the Soviets would classify those that didn't agree with their regime as having a mental disorder:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

And so of course the cons are trying to get "TDS" classified as a real mental disorder, since having a leader under the sway of the Russians is not enough, we need to copy the worst tactics of their past. Of course the mouth-breathing idiots that are the marks for this level of disinformation eat that up - anyone that points out what an idiot and a criminal that Donvict is must have "TDS"; that's just science.

https://www.newsweek.com/minnesota-senate-republicans-trump-derangement-syndrome-mental-illness-2045600

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

I'll take "Shit half the country knew back in 2018" for 1000, Ken

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

You don't need a mental health expert to see that. Millions of people see it.

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

This removal won't happen until just after the midterms. If it happens before that then the reptile won't get his 10 years of Vance.

As soon as Republicans get slaughtered in the midterms for doing everything that Trump said he would do to disastrous effect they will blame him for those failures anoint JD and then absolve themselves entirely of any responsibility for the policies they enacted during the Trump presidency.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. They’ll be scapegoating Trump and making Vance look like the sane one. All the while we know Peter Thiel put Vance in place just for this reason.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I mentioned once that the narrative will turn to focusing on trump being the instigator and cause and got castigated for it.

That shit is coming. They're just using the idiot to see how far they can go.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

Tired of these headlines, it's been years and years. Rawstory.com is just ragebait for liberals.

[–] Raglesnarf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

ohh yeah because this is what will get them to remove him

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Has been for st least over 20 years now.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

All of the assholes yelling "Sleepy Joe Biden" are totally fine with Dementia Don.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Repubs will get rid of him but the plan was, and so far apparently still is, to wait until after January next year, after the midterms and so that Vance will take over with less than half the term remaining, allowing him to run twice more. Their hope was that keeping him around until the midterms would help them hold the majority in both Houses of Congress, more than Vance would be able to. But by now, some of them are regretting that, since he's going off the deep end further and faster than they expected. They might lose both Houses anyway and now he's started this catastrophic war. I'm sure some of them are arguing for getting rid of him sooner than planned at this point.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't count on anything. The only winner in infighting is the status quo. There's a larger lesson there, should any anti-progressive Dems care to look for it.

load more comments
view more: next ›