this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
620 points (99.4% liked)

News

37474 readers
3153 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US Department of Agriculture has spent the past week notifying people that the country is (allegedly) overrun by individuals who are fraudulently claiming SNAP benefits, while (allegedly) driving luxury vehicles.

“In just ONE state, 14,000 individuals receiving SNAP benefits were driving LUXURY VEHICLES!” Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins posted on X last week. The official USDA account made similar claims, which were then amplified by figures like Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Rand Paul.

Those numbers are questionable at best. For one thing, the report they come from doesn’t name the state where thousands of people are allegedly buying Ferraris while using government money to buy food. For another, that report doesn’t include any explanation of its methodology.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I know someone on SNAP benefits. She drives a 25 year old Buick Lesabre with over 200,000 miles on it . Technically it’s a “luxury car,” which she got for $800.

Their stats are bullshit, spun in such a way as to churn up resentment towards the poorest , so the wealthiest can bilk more money from the middle.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

Why should it ever stop them? There has never been any evidence in anything they have ever accused.

They make the accusations then they rely on their propaganda machine, AKA literally all of media at this point, to put out their version of things to the entire nation before the truth has a chance to even circulate locally.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

fuck republicans

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Temu grandpa Munster.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Meanwhile, there's strong evidence… well, facts, at this point, that taxpayers' money is fueling a silly war for ego, possibly funding a gigantic ballroom, personal enrichment of high-profile in the administration. I wonder why they're not complaining about that.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

if people are taking advice from LIZARD RAFAEL CANCUN CRUZ as a fact, its on them.

To appropriate another well known saying about owing money... If one person believes easily disproven misinformation, that's on them. If a large percentage of the population believes it... That's on all of us... We need to bring back critical thinking to education but we also need to remove these corrupt assholes from power asap

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

The cruelty is the point. Also, where are the Trumpstein files?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

Republicans claim widespread food stamp fraud. What's missing? ~~Evidence~~ Food stamp fraud.

I fixed the headline.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like "luxury vehicles" is the same buzzword as "assault weapons." A meaningless buzzword to evoke emotion.

What's a "luxury vehicle?" What's the cutoff? Are they in a nicer Honda or a Lotus? Seeing as how this country's citizens are famously one illness or ouchie away from financial ruin, did they purchase this vehicle before or after needing assistance? Are they still making payments or is it paid off?

Facts and hard criteria or GTFO with this nonsense.

It's literally just trying to goad the struggling to pull the rug from the destitute, while the rich pop their champaign and laugh. It's class warfare rhetoric to take the heat off the Epstein class, and anybody falling for it is a damned fool.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

they were using "entitlements" before.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Even if you had 14,000 SNAP recipients driving “luxury vehicles” in every state that is still less than 2% of all beneficiaries nation wide.

Food assistance keeps people productive. Even a capitalist should advocate for it.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Starvation killing the people that fail to generate wealth trims expenses. Fear of losing your livelihood makes the rest more pliable. In the short term, it absolutely is what a capitalist would want: to increase their own profit.

However, in the long term, a smaller workforce eventually blunts the threat of firing and replacing unruly workers. But the long term doesn't matter as much to the individual capitalists: their allegiance is not to sustaining the system, but to their own enrichment. They just need it to work long enough for them to make as much money as they can.

That's also why they jump so eagerly on the promise of AI replacing workers: If it turns out true, it would be an immense boon both for profit and control. It would offset the long-term downsides while exaggerating the short-term gains. And if it fails, we're back to the status quo ante, the long-term damage being borne by someone else.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 2 hours ago

the long term doesn't matter as much to the individual capitalists: their allegiance is not to sustaining the system, but to their own enrichment.

Namely, cancer.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

It's a fucking excuse to make fuck-you-got-mine policies.

[–] Zamotic@lemmy.zip 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Watch they are going to fight to increase restrictions on SNAP benefit "handouts", but a ton of rich people fraudulently took out COVID loans, actually bought cars, never paid them back, and there is legit evidence but they were never prosecuted.

The new slogan for America should be: Protect the fellow rich, beat the poor down into dust.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

plus all the TAX breaks they get from hiring people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago

Musk is not a problem for them or the other 88 companies dodging taxes last year right.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

An old friend from college is now trying to live on $1800 a month from Social Security--in Southern California. She just found out, she will get $24 a month in SNAP, and she had to wade through bureaucracy even for that.

Keep the poors poor, working shit jobs or kill them off if they can't work. That's a Christian Nation, puh-raise JEE-zuz-ah!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

she qualifies for MEDI-CAL, so it would be free healthcare for her. since shes making less the maximum for medi-caid in california. shes pretty close though, i assume shes aiming for that 1800 in order to stay with medi-cal.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Love to hear this kind of bullshit while we drain trillions into the pockets of war-pigs.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

to MIC and being used as a proxy by israel.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 19 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

It also doesn’t define “LUXURY VEHICLE”

The banged up crossover SUV that came with CarPlay and OnStar so your insurance and the government can track your every move could be considered a LUXURY because CONNECTIVITY

Guys, poor people are forced to buy the only things we’ll sell to them. How come they never try not being poor? Lazy!

[–] violetring@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

I have a 2008 Infiniti. It's a luxury vehicle that I paid $5k for and runs like it's been smoking cigarettes the past 20 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 164 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (18 children)

I'd rather a hundred people get benefits they "don't need" than have one person go without the support they require.

Not that it's even happening, but even if it were I really wouldn't care even a little bit. And furthermore, food stamp benefits are pathetic in the US.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, nobody commits that level of petty fraud if their life is going well.

If you want food stamps badly enough to jump through the hoops required, then that should qualify you by default.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Well when they claimed there was a lot of voter fraud it turned out to be them with trump trying to manipulate state govs and now with gerrymandering.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 29 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Dude, it seems everything the GOP claims lacks evidence.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

especially coming from the mouth of the most infamous one, cruz.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

There are plenty of corporate leaders accepting huge sums of corporate socialism that are driving luxury vehicles.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Have Republicans ever provided evidence of anything they've ever said, ever?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

no they dont, they also dont actually report it on the news so they can twist the evidence however they want as long as the "evidence" is not verifiable.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

All the time. Said evidence was false or cherry picked and they never bring it to the courtroom successfully but they provide it nonetheless

load more comments
view more: next ›