this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
222 points (99.6% liked)

News

37649 readers
2092 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The American worker is on a productivity tear and it may have more to do with a surge in working from home than the effects of AI, according to a Stanford economist.

For the past five years, the output for non-farm businesses has increased by a sizable 2% per year, The Economist reported citing statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is a marked increase from the 1% productivity growth per year that defined most of the 2010s, and a trend that has taken even Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell by surprise.

Yet, while the hype around AI over the past several years makes it a logical candidate for the main driver behind the productivity boom, Nicholas Bloom, a Stanford economics professor who is known for explaining the Great Resignation of the early 2020s, says it’s more likely work-from-home policies since the pandemic are fueling the trend.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

This is honestly extremely fucking obvious.

We can't have a remote work paradigm for two main reasons.

1] C Suite / Managers are narcissistic sociopaths who need to feel important, competent, dominant and better than people, in person.

2] Moving to a remote work paradigm would crater commerical real estate values. This is far from impossible to fiscally manage without catastrophe, but it would expose the immense amount of fraud and corruption going on in that sector.

That's it.

Every other talking point you've ever heard against remote work are rationalizations to avoid these two points.

... the skill set and task set that LLMs are currently most well suited to replace in the workforce are C Suite and Upper Management.

Those are also the most expensive employees and the ones most likely to make catastrophic or consistent mistakes.

But they enjoy having a lot of money and power, so, we get clown world where they do everything they can to gaslight us to avoid realizing this.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

LLMs aren't even good at management. They gave one like $30k to run a coffee shop and it did shit like buy several years worth of rubber gloves and thousands of cans of tomato sauce. Iirc it spent $21k and only made like $5.6k

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

Didn't they perform really good in that test recentlyish?

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 58 seconds ago)

Yep. Luna performed exceptionally well and is currently running a profit at Anthropic's shop.

That's been kinda swept under the rug though; not sure why

[–] Arrandee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

There are some things you need a shared workspace for. Most of what we do in the US, having converted largely to an email-and-spreadsheets-based economy, does not.

My full-flavor, everyday workspace requires a comfortable chair, decent internet, and intermittent access to elecricity. It fits in a backpack. All of my coworkers are similarly equipped. Our 40-person startup has a minuscule office that we couldn’t begin to fit everybody in. We are making lots of money.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 1 hour ago

Return to office mandates should be climate crimes and the people responsible should be punished appropriately. I want to see these CEO ghouls and souless VPs on the side of the road picking up trash for the rest of their damned lives.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 72 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Imagine:

  • matching employees to jobs they are good at and enjoy, even if not physically nearby (a lot of good people have to take care of family, or have support networks they can’t/shouldn’t leave)
  • having a minimum of 30 more minutes a day back because you don’t have to commute
  • having a private quiet office to work in. Virtually no offices have private offices anymore.
  • having all your accessibility requirements met by default
  • being able to have healthier and cheaper lunches because you’ve got your full kitchen

There are things I miss about the office for sure, but I like remote work a lot.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 51 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

But think about it from the business's perspective!

  • lower rent

  • lower utilities

  • distributed IT

  • all employee work online/archivable by default

  • happier/healthier employees

  • access to global talent pool

  • easier to replace employees with LLMs!

The rabid return to office push is what really convinced me that most businesses are not in the hands of people who are trying to Do their business the best. At minimum it's extrovert CEOs, and feckless middle managers that didn't want to adapt

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago

The lower rent point is one of the problems. Many of these businesses own the real estate or lease for many years at a time. If the space is 70% unused, that increases costs and looks bad.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 18 points 3 hours ago

Their investors also have lots of money stuck in commercial real estate. And everyone knows golden egg geese are only good to bail out failed investments.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But how will your owners exercise arbitrary control and surveillance of you? I'm sorry but you just can't be productive like thay

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The wost part is they already have control and surveillance with all the endpoint management software installed on company devices.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 1 points 26 minutes ago

That's not as satisfying as in personand you know it

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 31 points 4 hours ago

And most of the dipshit CEOs are busy trying to roll out return to office mandates and then are flabbergasted when productivity and worker satisfaction both plummet.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 3 hours ago

The worst things about being in-office:

  1. Shitty bosses who think it's their personal kingdom.
  2. Shitty co-workers.
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 3 hours ago

The commons got a taste of freedom and decided they liked it.

If companies would work with their employees to better their lives, productivity would follow even more. AI is not why there is a productivity swing. Look at all all the problems and backtracking being done because of AI, even while there is more of a push for it.

I question some of the numbers. "Productivity" is a word thrown around in my workplace too, but it doesn't mean what the dictionary has for it, it means the numbers are cooked to make things seem great.

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

How is productivity of an "office worker" measured? I imagine it's somehow deducted from the value of whatever their company produces and sells, but if that is grossly overvalued, there is no productivity gain.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

They are still measuring like the industrial ages. How many teapots did they make. The information age changed things and we stopped making widgets with our hands and started using our brains for creative/innovation/digital services.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Same as a remote worker - work output