this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
477 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

20244 readers
1742 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Actual capture. I failed to solve it.)

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Um akshually ☝️🤓 most of those objects don't reflect light they absorb light and they re-emit photons at a different energy level.

(Pre submission edit I fact checked this first and while it is true, the same can be said for photons reflected by a mirror, so op is basically right, they are all reflections)

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago
[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had one of these earlier tonight which was asking which of the pictured animals came from eggs. Only after clicking on the various birds and submitting (success) did I notice there was also a crocodile. I then really wanted to be able to redo it with the crocodile included and see if it knew crocodiles also come from eggs.

[–] mikezeman@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I did the same one and did select the crocodiles, which passed. I suspect the captcha has less to do with correct answers and more to do with analyzing mouse movements or something like that

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At this point, I'll just close the tab rather than bothering to deal with this bullshit.

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Actually a science site I wanted to access.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago

Send the screenshot to support and call them posers

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

No science 4 u

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. I loose interest and walk away.

[–] Loid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Just don't use it too much and it tightens up again

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would also be confused af. First, I would think it wants me to tap objects with a somewhat glossy surface, even though all of them actually reflect light. But having sorted the first trick in this question, I am now confronted with two other questions: is a body of water considered an "object"? Also, are those actually photos of a river or are they illustrations of a river? They don't look realistic to me... Because if they're illustrations then they wouldn't be particularly more reflective than anything else in this set of images

I hate these things

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It looks like they have an AI generate all of the valid images.

They probably have a database of images and then come up with some BS prompt and having the AI generate the valid responses. But because everyone involved here seems to be an idiot, the prompts are stupid.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

It looks like they have an AI generate all of the valid images.

Are you suggesting that the Voight-Kampff test is being administered by robots? shocked-pikachu

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, they all reflect light because you can see them?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 54 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Trick question! They are all squares filled with pixels on a computer monitor, they emit light! The correct answer was "none of the above."

I've identified a bot account.

[–] ericheese@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trick trick question! Suppose I watched this on that one reflective LCD monitor with no backlight

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago

Then all of the above would have been the correct answer.

But you didn't, did you? I can tell. You've got that "emissive display" vibe to you.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah but even the LCD panel reflects some light or else I wouldn't have to stare at myself when I end up in a dark videogame cave.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

C'est ne pas un sock

[–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 2 days ago
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I feel like autism makes these impossible for me. I have to try several times every time.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, more often than not its the same even for people without it. Like how tf should i know if the edge of the bicycle wheel just being slightly over the corner should be considered part of the bycicle or not

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tap the objects which have little in the way of micro surface roughness and reflect light in a mostly specular fashion

there

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

See, that actually makes sense.

[–] NegativeLookAhead@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 days ago

Where's the Vantablack™ ?

[–] NessD@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bob Ross would turn in his grave!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Thomas Kincade, vomiter of light!

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Can you see it at all under any circumstances using any ability to detect light?

If so...

[–] aMockTie@piefed.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What in the AI dystopian future kind of BS is that?

Also I hate to pick nits, but it's technically "CAPTCHA" and not "capture." It's supposed to be an acronym for Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I thought that these had been cracked by AI already so I'm not quite sure why we're even being presented with it.

To train AI to solve them

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

Usually they're still used to label images for training AI

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is a screen capture of this ridiculous test though

[–] aMockTie@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh true! "Actual capture" sounds a bit strange to me if it's referring to a screen capture, but it's entirely possible that was OP's intent and I misunderstood.

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Tap objects that can experience true suffering.

Peewee, Chairry, Cowboy Curtis,
Chairry, Randy, Jambi
Human Fetus, Mr. Kite, Chairry
[–] Jakylla@jlai.lu 6 points 2 days ago

Tap objects that are currently being exposed to true suffering:

The wall behind you, the upper-left of your hair,  the upper-right of your hair,  The wall behind you
The wall behind you, the top-left of your head,    the right of your head,        The wall behind you
The wall behind you, the bottom-left of your head, the bottom-right of your head, The wall behind you
The desk you are on, your left arm on the table,   your right arm below the desk, The desk you are on
[–] qt0x40490FDB@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

You see, now they want to make sure you are dumber than the AI. You code as AI because you know too much.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Nice try, BOT!

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe (3,2) is wanting you to notice the sun in the picture - or is it the eye of horus?

Can the sun reflect light?
Hypothesising that it probably can, theoretically; do humans have any test / measurement apparatus that might empirically prove it against the background emissions? Do we need to wait for a 'Disaster Area' concert?

sorry if this should be an NSQ, I 'm sure enough as I care that this is nothing to do with the botty-detector. But I am interested in whether anything strange happens with high(ish?) densities of light.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Selecting all the water pics didn't solve it?

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not necessarily. hCaptcha is not very reliable in my experience. Sometimes it wants you to select multiple pictures but only shows one that matches the prompt. Or or gives you multiple matching images but still says you're wrong. Sometimes it tells you you passed but then doesn't bother setting the token correctly so you have to do it again. Of course all of these can combine until you solve variations of the same damn captcha thirty times in a row.

hCaptcha is such a horrible buggy mess that my base assumption is that I'll get trapped in an infinite loop anytime I see it.