More accurately...you're the gray car wanting to turn right, but there is about 1/2-1/3 full car length in-between the black-green-white cars blocking the lane.
this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
744 points (96.6% liked)
Comic Strips
23825 readers
2507 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
Rules
-
π Be Nice!
- Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
-
ποΈ Community Standards
- Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
- Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
- Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
- Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
-
𧬠Keep it Real
- Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
-
π½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due
- Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
- Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
-
π Post Formatting
- Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
- Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
- When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
β Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
β Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
-
π¬ Post Frequency/SPAM
- Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 π) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 π) will be removed.
-
π΄ββ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)
- Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
SΓ, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
- Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
-
πΏ Moderation
- We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
- When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists
The following artists are banned from the community.
- Jago
- Stonetoss
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Web Accessibility
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
Web of Links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I was at a traffic light with my support worker a few weeks ago, and this dumb fuck wasnβt on the sensor. He was sitting there for like ten minutes and wouldnβt move forward. My sw got out of that lane and went a different way. When we came back a couple mins later he was still there!
Is that how traffic lights work in your area? Like they don't cycle at all when you're not on the sensor?
In theory, it's an efficiency measure.
If there is a main road with higher volume, various side roads and no other bottleneck down the road that needs to be accounted for, it doesn't make much sense to regularly interrupt main road traffic if nobody else needs the intersection. Conversely, depending on the interval, the side road drivers may have to wait a long while if they just barely missed a green.
Both of these cause traffic risk as well: Firstly that the main road driver who decides the red light is stupid and cuts off a side road driver they didn't see, secondly that a side road driver who barely missed green doesn't want to wait and tried to squeeze in before main road traffic picks back up.
Having the traffic lights switch on demand reduced those risks: Main road drivers who know that it's red only if there's gonna be some other car may be less reckless in running it, while side road drivers don't have to wait as long and don't feel the need to squeeze in.
Of course, it can't ever remove the risks entirely because humans are what they are. It also depends on people actually driving up to the point where the sensor detects them. If they don't know about the concept, they'll have a hard time understanding what's wrong. I was taught those things in driving school, but if it's not a thing in your area or wasn't when you learned, chances are nobody told you about it later.
depends a lot, but yes some lights are like that.
In my area the sensor turns on at (???) some time at night. Otherwise it always cycles. At night though, if you aren't on the sensor it will skip.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Just one more lane bro! That'll get rid of the traffic bro!
Texas agrees:
Read a book a few months ago by Tom Vanderbilt called traffic that was an academic look at the titular traffic and it showed negative returns on adding lanes.
Can you summarize the gist of it? I keep seeing this claim and it is extremely non-intuitive.
Supposing itβs true, how is it weβve magically arrived at the optimal number of lanes as of the uttering of the statement?
If itβs a basically linear function where the lowest traffic is near-zero lanes, is there an implication that mass transit would be built in tandem with lane reduction, or does everyone just get more miserable?
Edit: Iβll add that what Iβve heard is that more people choose to drive until the misery-equilibrium is reached. So roads will always be as busy as they are now because they are at their max tolerable level of drivability. That seems plausible for some roads and for some finite number of lanes, but not generally applicable.
Essentially you need all streets to be serviceable by trucks, ambulances, etc., and therefore the general minimum is 1 lane. As you add car infrastructure, it becomes relatively more convenient to drive to a destination than take other modes of transport. You are also typically investing in the car infrastructure at the expense of alternatives, a straight opportunity cost and a sort of spiralling trap, as development becomes more and more centred around the car.
Braess's paradox outlines adding a route can actually worsen overall network flow, and more broadly, new capacity just attracts new drivers until congestion returns to roughly where it started. Suboptimalities like the accordion effect are compounded as more traffic is added to the system.
Induced demand doesn't imply the current number of lanes is optimal, just that expansion tends to be self-defeating.
Lane reduction alone would just increase misery, so the answer is redirect road space into transit, which absorbs displaced drivers at higher capacity. Otherwise it's just misery.
I have a civil engineering degree with a focus on transport but never really used it for that, so this is something that I was taught, but had over a decade to devolve more into opinion.
Lane reduction alone would just increase misery...
Agreed, mostly. In my neighborhood (Grid system) they updated the 4-lane roads in the area to 2-lane roads with center turn lanes. It's made traffic much better, simply because there's no traffic waves created by people lane changing around people turning left.
Am I the only one deeply irritated that the left going lane has no arrows and no one is indicating left either?
This intersection really hurts my sense of order!
My headcanon is that the right turning person's blinker is the only one out of sync
Thanks, that idea has a certain beauty to it.
I will now adopt it and move closer to inner peace again!
Here, I fixed it. The person in the back row has their right blinker on so they can get into the left-turn only lane.
load more comments
(17 replies)
Inaccurate. It's two cars with 1.5 car lengths in front of each.
You're right, this is worse.
So close. The first car is too close to the line.
I drive to patients homes all day and I daily see people in the suburbs stop far enough back that they don't always trip the left turn arrow, sometimes leaving that lane stuck an extra cycle. It would be infuriating, except that my drive time is paid and mileage reimbursed, so I've chosen not to let it bother me. I just roll my eyes and wait.
load more comments
(9 replies)
This feels like an analogy for bike lanes.
No, the analogy for bike lanes would be what has been posted in another comment:
Right-turning cars typically have to cross the bikelanes going straight on, being one of the most dangerous situations for bicyclists and showing just how much of an afterthought the bikelanes are.
I once got stuck in a bus like this. I was 20 minutes early for my connection. I missed my connection.
This reads like a Mitch Hedberg joke.
One time, I was late for the bus. The schedule said I was also 20 minutes early for the bus. It seems to me there is an obvious disagreement in the late-slash-early status of the bus. This cannot be good for traffic. Someone should do something about this.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Man, I could have saved like ten, or even fifteen seconds if the infrastructure was bigger.
As an aside, are there real L-shaped traffic light stacks? I've always seen them with the arrow at the bottom. The direction of the arrow makes it perfectly understandable without putting it off to the side. But I could imagine a traffic light company marketing these.
Idk, my city in UK has those, though it's usually backwards L for left turn.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Canada, in a single image? I've driven cars in most European countries, Canada, US (small amount), Mexico.
Canada has the worst road designs of them all, though since almost everything here is modelled after the US, I guess it could still be worse there
I regularly see road situations where I can only wonder how high they were, what they were smoking, and where I can get some
Intersections where only one lane has traffic lights, the other doesn't. How are you supposed to cross that? Simple: you throw a hail Mary, close your eyes, andale a run for it while praying to some non-exist God. This is howy stepson got sideswiped, by a guy having to do exactly that.
Making a left turn in Canada? Great, you got green! Go? Well no, cars are still coming from the other side, they inexplicably got green too so now the intersection with traffic lights also acts as an intersection without traffic lights. Amazing designs!
But wait, there is more!
Once those cars from the other side are gone, you might be tempted to think that you can now just drive, but noooooooh, this is Canada! Pedestrians also got green so now you need to try and avoid those too if you can. The amount of near misses that I've had and that I've seen with others is staggering, crossing roads in Canada is fucking dangerous.
All this adds up to that going left basically means that you get green light and you can't do shit until it gets orange, then you quickly squeeze yourself through and pray that you didn't murder a school class by accident.
This, in turn, means that going to the left is an exercise in patience, because each green red cycle, about one car will be able to go to the left. If each cycle takes a minute, and you have ten cars in front of you, that means you'll have to wait ten minutes I shit you not.
Compare that to the Netherlands, where intersections get redesigned and rebuilt every time when anyone sees there are tooany accidents, and there are soany amazing traffic flow control designs there. Here in canada, traffic flow designs is "road, done"
I love Canada, I feel proudly Canadian, but Canadian road designs are removed as fuck.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Here in 'Merika, it would only take two cars to block the turning lane, because half of these morons are oblivious and/or on their goddam phones.
I thought you were going to say because the cars are the size of tanks.
Two cars or one stupidly oversized truck.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Even more annoying is when the green car leaves 2+ car lengths in front of it so the car behind can't get into the turn lane if they need to.
Where exactly are those cars heading? There's no road forward and only one lane to the right.
In my experience the turn lane doesnβt have a hard cutoff like that, you can usually ride the shoulder a bit to get around people if needed
load more comments
(4 replies)
This would be much less of a problem if fewer people insisted on bringing their whole living room everywhere they go.
Americans have to have large cars because they are always 2 paychecks away from living in them
view more: next βΊ