this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
485 points (99.8% liked)

politics

29964 readers
2291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New Jersey Democrat laid out how the U.S. had allowed Iran to sell an estimated $10 billion worth of sanctioned oil to China and then promised to further alleviate sanctions in return for releasing highly enriched uranium and committing to limiting its enrichment capacity.

“And that was the exact deal that you guys vilified, that the president and you vilified President Obama for having,” Booker said. Of course, Donald Trump’s deal is even worse than Booker says, as it reportedly includes a $300 billion investment fund for Tehran, in the event that a deal is reached.

$10 Billion to $300 billion. ART OF THE DEAL!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've said it before but that's what Trump always does. He fucks up an existing situation (which may not be ideal in most cases, but then few things are), and after making everything worse for everyone, arrives at a so called deal that isn't even half as good as the original one was.

And then there's much rejoicing about how great he is.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Fucking middle-man for a president.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

You forget about how the whole thing either enriches himself and his cronies or benefits him cough Operation Epstein Distraction cough in some other way.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Fascists don't like facts.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 108 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So much gas-lighting going on from Trump's Whitehouse over the Iran war its ridiculous.

If Iran is still controlling the Strait of Hormuz to the point where they can use reopening it as a negotiation tool - then with all sincerity you haven't won shit.

Billions a week are being spent on a war that was completely unnecessary, leading to negotiations so bad they make the Obama administration look like masterminds for being half-competent at the job.

... And all this bullshit occurred just so Trump could distract from him being a paedophile - but if being treasonous cunt wasn't enough to get him in prison, I doubt being a pedo will do much either.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But hey, at least the government is saving a few million on pennies

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

They saved gaza, didnt they? Nobody talking about it anymore?

Guys?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

leading to negotiations so bad they make the Obama administration look like masterminds for being half-competent at the job.

Curious what issues you had with the JCPOA

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Democrats need to go for the jugular and proclaim that Trump and the GOP have LOST the war with Iran. They need to force the point that with all the military might of the USA, the GOP was so incompetent, they lost.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Idk sounds like too easy of a win, what about running an unpopular plutocrat? Maybe Pelosi?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Pelosi is too young.

/s

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah. Dems should push the point that imperialism is doomed. That the MIC needs to be deconstructed. That serving zionism is genocidal. Etc.

But they won't.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Because the average American still thinks half of what you just said is insane. And you could sell them if you dumbed it down, but that means not using words like zionism

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Somehow Marco Rubio is the smartest crayon in the box in the admin?!?!. The bar is low, so so so so incredibly low. It’s subterranean.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Marco Rubio has a contemptible level of cowardice.

This is a non sequitur/ad hominem, but here is the debate where Chris Christie, a fellow cunt, handed Rubio his arse.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9OZ8xHTX7c

Also remember that Chris Christie prepped Trump for his own debates.

These people should absolutely be imprisoned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Like 15 years ago I had a couple of conservative morons who lived next door to me try to convince me how great Marco Rubio was and how he would be excellent as president. And I just looked at them like they were the dumbest people I'd ever met in my entire goddamn life.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 80 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s “enhanced” by the Trump branding

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They're literally arguing this right now. For the Kennedy center, the judge deemed the placement of the name illegal, and it must be removed.

They argue the name cannot be removed because it will make the Kennedy center 'financially unreliable'

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Good, the whole fucken world needs to become financially unreliable right now. I am so sick of these vampires chasing the dragon when this entire fucking society thing is supposed to be about making life easier. Its driving me fucking insane.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean as in not human, sure. Billionaires stop being human after a certain amount of time with that kind of power

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Well you also have corporations as non-human people, according to our illustrious top legal minds.

Granted, those "people" exist so that profits can be passed to the billionaires while liabilities are not

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Word brother. It's time to take a torch to the whole stupid system.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Kennedy center seemed to be doing just fine before the orange turd stuck his name on it

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Like the country. And the east wingbof the WH. And some casinos. And a university. And a family. And the air aound his orangeness.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah the good ol "financially unreliable" GOP attack plan. As an example-- Congress made USPS "finacially unreliable" by making them fund 30 year pensions completely in advance when hiring anyone. And then appointing a massive investor in USPS's competitors (Dejoy) to head it, followed by a fedex board member to head it (Steiner). And then when USPS workers somehow survived anyway Dejoy needlessly decomissioned a bunch of brand new automated sorting machines to make the need to hire humans to manually sort mail crazy high-- when hiring humans cost millions per person at time of hire because of the insane pension rule.

Its a good sneaky back room deal to kill just about any government organization you want. Without that the USPS was profitable even without raising rates and had extraordinarily high approval ratings. USPS had the gaul to compete with other commerical shipping companies like Fedex, UPS, and XPS logistics so it had to be murdered. Screw what the citizens need or what effects that would have on the economy. They will do the same nonsense to every branch of government, and evidently to the Kennedy center.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Good point, reminds me of the argument in my city about the busses being non-profitable. If my taxes go to a service, that service does not need to be profitable. Nobody asks how much revenue the fire department generates.

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

$290B for licensing his name 10 billion to build five new hotels.

“Whoooooooos slushing my fuuuuuuundssss?”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

$300B LOSER fund. Its for reparations.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's gonna be fun watching these assholes trying to rebrand that via their Ministry of Truth networks - Faux, Sinclair, etc.

I'm going to have a lot of fun pointing out what it really is if it comes to that, though.

We'll need to workshop some fun names. So far, I like:

The cut-n-run fund.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The SHART OF THE STEAL!

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Yes all correct but I still haven’t forgotten that Corey Booker tried to block cheaper pharmaceutical drug imports from Canada on some bullshit about safety, and I still hope he falls into a pit of starving giant toe biter bugs.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Last I checked Booker was also still voting as AIPAC wanted him to so his “quiet trouble” bullshit is exactly that: bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think Marco used to be a bit taller when he had a bit of a spine.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago

Before he started glazing trump he was an empty suit who did whatever Florida's sugar lobby wanted. He's never had anything

[–] protist@retrofed.com 4 points 3 days ago

I don't recall that time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How dare Iran control their own resources for their own people's benefit?! 😡

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They both refer to Iran as an enemy, with no potential relationship beyond war or shitty deal.. Yet comfortably, the US is in good relations with other Middle Eastern nations, Israel, even China.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

literally went to war with Vietnam, now a supposedly communist country and best buddies but need to destroy Cuba because communist country.

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 2 points 2 days ago

Do Rubio and his cronies realise Florida is in range of Sahed drones launched from Cuba? Are they ready to see the first aerial bombing of an American city since Pearl Harbor?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

They both refer to Iran as an enemy

Imperialism has unquestionable bi-partisan support.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›