this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
667 points (99.6% liked)

Greentext

8413 readers
1263 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

This is def nostalgia goggles, so many games were broken buggy messes back then because there was no way to ship updates

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

No, they weren't. Most had bugs, but they weren't game-breaking. A lot of people took joy in finding and exploiting the bugs too. Dupes, etc.

Yeah, some shitty games were loaded with bugs.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

bugs? nah, not a problem

whistles in Morrowind

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

Try playing the original SEGA catalog. Lemme know how many of those games work.

"Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.” ― Douglas Adams, "The Salmon of Doubt"

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

When a game sucked ass then you had a physical product you could sell or trade to offload it. Instead of the whole game getting the servers shut off and delisted within a year if it’s bad today. Even the bad games were better back then because of this

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

On one hand it's nostalgia, on another - over-fixation on a certain type of games that are designed to be addictive and drain your wallet. But there are many other games to play that are nothing like that.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

i've played single player games my entire life and got nothing but shit for it. i guess because they don't have all the drama of multiplayer games and the constant updates?

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Full game on a disk? You new school kids don't know that 1/2 of the game is loading the 17, 5 1/2" floppies in order just to install your game.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

and we all had our own way of stacking the floppies. so you would never install anything with anyone you didn't trust around, because they might move your stacks.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The sweet spot was getting the full game on disc and getting included DLC, having the ability to mod the game, and run private servers. It was kinda the golden era of this stage in gaming. Computers were powerful enough to give a great visual experience and studios were still interested in producing engaging storylines in triple A releases instead of just banging out battle royale games.

You could just enjoy the game as-is with a really good singleplayer campaign and then with whatever online offered. To this day I still have great memories of Half Life, Crysis, or even MoH:AA, especially the Snowy Park map. Do they compare graphically with today’s games like Fortnite? Not a chance. But you remember the story and how the game was way better at pulling you into it.

Some of the mods from this era turned out to be just as popular, if not moreso, than the original base game. Some of them live on to this day.

Sure, some Steam games offer mods and the like, but it certainly isn’t the same thing as what we had 15 or so years ago.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you haven't grabbed it, Black Mesa is like $3 right now during the summer sale

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Never played it. I’ll have a look. Thanks.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's a modern day Half Life 1. Fan remake, with greatly expanded Xen levels. Obviously they got Valve's permission, given the whole companion cube steam machine fiasco.

[–] ArcaneGadget@nord.pub 22 points 8 hours ago (8 children)

Honestly, that's the entire reason i lost interest in consoles after buying the PS4. If i need to:
1 Boot up the console.
2 Update the system (twice).
3 PSN account bullshit.
4 Insert disc.
5 Install the game.
6 Download 50GB update for the game.
7 Install said update.
8 Finally start the game.
9 Login and TOS bullshit.
10 Finally play game.

I might just as well use my PC for gaming at that point. The games library is larger and the exclusives are just not worth it. Especially after Sony started releasing those on PC as well.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago

Especially after Sony started releasing those on PC as well.

They put a stop to that, and now it's more clear why: they want absolute control over the price of their games.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

PC gaming has more exclusives btw

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rachelzsnow@lemmy.pt 13 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

when can i stop living in this universe and switch back to the one we originally were on? man i miss it so much. That and original pizzahut

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

and those planters cheeseballs. the new ones don't have as much msg

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Convince another weasel to dine on the particle collider in Switzerland.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

you never did and you never will.

games cost about 4x what they do today back then. you were paying 40-80 dollars per game, and they never got discounted really unless they became a huge hit and got a best seller release and maybe they went down to 20-30, in 2026 dollars, that's between 40-160 dollars per game. which is the reason why most folks only bought like 2-4 games a year if they were lucky. now you are buying dozens of games per year for like $100-200.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

i buy two games per year for $100 tops but more like $50 after shipping and taxes. my personal and local public library give me plenty to do.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›