this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
417 points (99.8% liked)

politics

30339 readers
2665 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It is clear he has an entire apparatus of professionals who job is to steal from the public. An administration solely designed to constantly grift as much as possible.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

The right number is zero.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Do professional day traders even make 21,000 in a year? That's 57 trades a day. That's wild.

Edit: 80 if you exclude weekends, even more if you exclude holidays.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Damn, he trades almost as frequently as he tweets. That's crazy

Assuming 8 hour days, thats a trade every 6 minutes.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 90 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

"yeah, but both sides are bad though!!!"

Side 1 - 13

Side 2 - 21,000

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago

'I will eat literal shit because its the same as dark chocolate' - R voters and 2024 sitouts.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Both numbers are unacceptable, Trump's is just a much higher level

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Whoooosssssssshhhhh

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Now do Congress.

I realize this is a tall ask... I can wait.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you think it's an interesting stat, you could also collect the data, rather than waiting for someone else to do it for you.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

~57.5 trades/day! Every day!

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Almost like between that, watching Fox News, and napping, he doesn't do anything other than agree with whatever the last person told him.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget posting hundreds of messages a day to social media, and his regular "rallies".

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

No wonder he's asleep all he time

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

In magamath, 13=21,000. And don't get me started on the bothsiderist geniuses that love to debbie downer everything and build moral equivalencies between the two parties.

I saw some Republican dipshit politician on television waving away the blatant corruption of the Donvict crime family just this very week and then pivoting to Hunter and Joe, FFS. Because, hey, Donvict is being transparent about it argle bargle something something Hunter and Joe covered it up.

🤣

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

"How could Obama make Hunter and Joe do this?"

--magashitferbrainz, probably

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago

How many wars did Biden start to boost those 13 stocks?

How many fishermen did he bomb? How many Iranian schools?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So, serious question.
How much time would it take to do about 60 trades a day?

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 3 days ago

That would be about a day traders worth of time.. probably 4-5+ hours/day depending on variable factors. It's definitely an aggressive trading strategy and not something I can see a "super busy president who looks out for his people" able to accomplish normally.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

To make the trade? Not actually that long. Planning and evaluating take longer, but he's inevitably not the one pushing the buttons or making the plan, which is also not something that needs to be done for each one.

It takes me longer to move money between my checking and savings accounts.

The concerning thing isn't the time investment, it's the active nature of financial involvement in a situation where there's a major conflict of interest.
Stock trading isn't automatically problematic for an elected official, but it's very easy to produce the appearance or actuality of improper conduct.
The safest route is to turn control over to a third party who doesn't know who they're managing.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Trump himself isn’t doing the trading.

[–] epicthundercat@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A President could do a tremendous amount of damage with even 1.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's ok the guy has dementia....he doesn't realize that he's basically closer to the eternal life than most of us. Can't take anything with you. Not even clothes.

If I was the guy, I would spend my money on happiness.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I doubt there are many forms of happiness left for him that money can't buy. All he wants is supremacy and control.

I think at this point it's fair to assume that whatever mental faculties he had are getting away from him. His bowels sure are. The Iran stunt didn't go as he wanted to. I'm sure you can find plenty more examples.

For all that he might cover it up, some part of him knows all these things. He'll cover it up, try to bury it in delusion, refuse to acknowledge it, but I can tell you from experience that that doesn't make the nagging doubt and frustration go away. So long as he can't accept his limits, he will never be happy.

Getting old can be bad enough for the sane and well-adjusted, and he is neither. I hope that you reach old age much happier, healthier and wiser.

[–] rothaine@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can envision the Trumper response:

"He had Hunter do the trades FOR him"

Or maybe

"Well obviously! The Biden crime family only does backdoor deals. At least Trump uses the same stock market as everyone else!"

Which one will the right-wing propaganda machine go with, I wonder?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Why not both?

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah well, he's such a high level business genius its natural that he increased his net wealth by $2b a year while president. the real question is how he managed to not make any money in the first 79 years of his life. /s

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 3 days ago

Games are easier with cheat codes.

Because he's an absolute shitty business person who's entire plan was to send in lawyers who did nothing more than file infinite extensions until the other side ran out of money...and embezzling money from "charities".

[–] RollyJeho@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So he is a better businessman than a politician or even a person.

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Business man? Nah, that’s like saying someone’s “lucky” for playing in a rigged casino.

He’s a great fraud.

[–] RollyJeho@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm... If frauds can help your business despite making you a bastard, why can't you then still be classified as a good businessman?

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’d personally argue operating outside of the law disqualifies you from being a good businessman. If I can win a game of chess by moving the pieces when you’re not looking, am I a grandmaster?

Same with business. Using privileges and loopholes that other people don’t have access to is not being good at business.

The same way having your father loan you a million dollars disqualifies you. I can beat Mo Farah if I run a shorter race, who’s the better runner?

[–] RollyJeho@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Okay, makes sense. Then, Trump is only good in making people laugh of him.