Watermarking never meant to be a legitimate way of telling this stuff apart. Anyone slightly savvy could run a generator locally and produce images without watermarking, if they really meant to fool others. You are right in that the watermarking makes it (or did) more difficult for the average joe, but yeah. This is a never was kind of scenario
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world
7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Eventually, you won’t be able to and we’ll be back to what my generation learned early on, don’t trust what you see on the Internet.
lmao. the circle of life.
Did you worry about photoshops too? Because many of those were absolutely hard to tell
Not true. If it looks shopped I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
I appreciate this classic meme
You've never seen an expert
Be careful of falling victim to bad toupees.
You always know when you spot a bad fake, but you have no idea how many good fakes flew right past your radar. We tend to think we're much better at these things than we really are.
The expression they were using indicated that they were joking.
Oh. I missed the reference. Thanks!
Then you will learn same skill for slop most likely
mathmatically you won't.
Everything is slop. Problem solved.
I drop musical artists like it's hot the moment I find out they support Israel. I'm not opposed to doing the same for AI.
Go see art in real life. It's all original content.
I mean, you can make physical art using AI.
searches
https://www.art-magazine.ai/program
Anytime, everywhere, all about AI & generative art
A list of AI art and generative art exhibitions, festivals and events.
Ah yes, such beauty, so vogue

Look up ai rating instructions for instruction following, correctness, naturalness, and composition, they always tend to fail on one of those fronts and if you learn to identify them like a trainer it is easier to notice
Main thing I always see is either text legible and somehow always facing the camera, like every sign and window is perfectly aligned so none face away from the camera or text is blurry gibberish. Harder to tell without text, but then it's usually some sort of composition (lighting, textures) or correctness (extra fingers, illogical placement) issue.
We can’t tell the difference anymore - we simply can’t trust anything on social media anymore as it’s mostly not true - also print and broadcast media are equally lies…
Always have been.
Not really.
Yes, really.
The word "slop" has lost all meaning.
You could say it's slop slop. The slopocalypse. Slopageddon. Ragnaslop
How so? It is still slop.
So are you.
Having said it, does it make it true?
You act like a toddler.
"It's slop because I said it's slop! Waaaah!"
The phrase "lost all meaning" has lost all meaning
That all depends on what “means” means.
If you can establish that it was written before 2021 or so, it's probably not from an LLM. That kind of text has been compared to "low background steel", typically salvaged from ships sunk in WW2 or earlier. Low background steel is a valuable commodity used for some types of highly sensitive instruments. Steel made in August 1945 or later, especially post 1950-ish, always has trace amounts of radioactivity from u-know-what.
Note that contamination is contagious. Even if you know that a human wrote something post-2021, for example because you wrote it yourself, you still can't say it's guaranteed AI-free, because of how AI has warped language and to some extent everyone's minds.
https://englishlanguagestudies.com/the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/urban-survival/202507/the-emerging-problem-of-ai-psychosis
A.I. has quietly added quietly to everything. You can tell if a YouTube video script has A.I. assistance if they say quietly a lot. I dunno why it's obsessed with that word. Sneaky fuckers
Everything is slop, no AI necessary.