this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
85 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

22079 readers
2128 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

Putting aside all of the false positives and mission creep e.g. used on unruly 3rd graders, let's imagine a real-world scenario where a shooter comes prepared with goggles and these drones simply blind every student in their immediate vicinity.

Who's gonna be liable for those deaths?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 10 hours ago

Like they need to see in order to fire indiscriminately into a screaming crowd.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Oh yes. Pepper spray. That’ll stop a determined aggressor.

(/s. It won’t. This drone is not for that. Probably for quelling student protest or something to that effect instead.)

(Anything but gun control, amirite?)

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Anything but hiring human guards maybe?

Who am I kidding, the admin gets a kick back from the vendor for showcasing their tech. Money is always the answer in 'murica

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Human guards would be more effective than the drone at stopping an active shooter; but they won’t stop active shooters from being active in the first place.

For that you need to attack the actual problems.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We have direct evidence that "trained" humans don't help at all either. Uvalde.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Hammering a nail with a rock is a more effective solution than hammer a nail with a cucumber. Doesn’t mean the rock is a good solution.

And that should give you an idea of how bad drones in schools are.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

Southeners... Southeners never change.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

Damn if only we had safety glasses

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

So... how long until some kid discovers the login/password to this system is Admin/admin1234?

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Speaking to Barron’s magazine, Oborski said King had observed the effectiveness of the technology during the war in Ukraine.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Some kid walking with a pen in their hand, SHOOTER, SEND DRONES!!

Later that day: our new system still needs testing bs statement.

Happens a few more times and an actual shooter shows up and nothing happens,

statement: system had to be taken down for testing/maintenance (and cost cutting because AI tokens expensive af) and unfortunately during that time a shooter appeared on the premises and we were unable to do anything.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

statement: system had to be taken down for testing/maintenance (and cost cutting because AI tokens expensive af) and unfortunately during that time a shooter appeared on the premises and we were unable to do anything.

To be fair, according to the article these drones are remote piloted, not AI controlled. So they probably won't function because rent-a-cop Stu is taking a three hour long lunch break at the stripclub or passed out drunk under his desk.

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The next school shooters will just carry an extra melee weapon to swat down the drones.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I mean they already are carrying a range weapon. Not that hard to shoot down a drone. A slow moving janky drone. That cost 2mil.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago