this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
192 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30707 readers
1856 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘Forest management alone cannot address the hotter, drier conditions that are making fires more intense … — that requires confronting the underlying crisis.’

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

I hate to "um actually..." This, but just acknowledging won't do shit. It's going to take centuries of work.

This is the coolest summer you will experience for the rest of your life. Wildfires will only get worse. Nothing will get better for us.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Conservatives are not just ignoring it, they pretend it's not a thing. Other than to gaslight and say, "the climate changes all the time, but there is no evidence humans can change it".

Often lumped in with a nice dollop of religious bullshit about how it's "arrogant" to assume humans can change the climate, because only their god (in this case, Jehovah/Allah/Yahweh) can do that.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 16 points 16 hours ago

Wild fires are only going to get worse. Full stop.

[–] lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca 32 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I hate to burst anybody’s bubble but we’ve seen these exact headlines for decades. It’s become increasingly clear that those who can make a real difference with climate change are not interested in doing so.

We’re already irreversibly fucked as a planet.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

No matter how irreversibly fucked we are, we can and will continue to get even more fucked every second we don't change our habits.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

irreversibly

Not yet. There’s still hope.

  • CO2 in the stratosphere clears in like a century or two. Our actions today can help our great grandchildren see a friendlier environment again
  • science around tipping points, permanent changes, is less well understood, so we don’t have strong evidence of having passed any yet
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"Fuck them, I got mine" -boomers

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

LOL, they might have been the first generation to really start doing the work on sounding the alarm, ironically.

Their parents and grandparents were likely even worse as far as this kind of attitude. I know that was the truth in my immediate family, anyway.

[–] lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

What actions are being taken though - by the people who can actually make a difference? Governments are reversing to mining coal. Trump is illegally drilling Greenland for oil. Like, what actions are actually being taken for our great grandchildren?

Many scientists say it's too late. That's my point.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It’s too late to meet our target, allegedly the point where we can avoid serious disruptions. We’ve failed to prevent harm to ourselves and can’t take it back

But there’s so much more serious harm looming that can still be avoided. We can still keep it from getting worse

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

There’s so much truth in that cartoon, yet it’s still coming true. Renewable and storage are revolutionary and many parts of the global economic system are restructuring. We’re late and slow but it is happening.

Except in the US. We not only threw away several chances at restructuring our economy to profit from it, but we’re working on turning several of our remaining industrial giants irrelevant, all while somehow thinking it’s a good idea to maximize our impact on the environment

[–] lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Sure, I bet we can keep it from getting worse. I'll be here waiting patiently for some billionaire corpo to decide to do something for the environment over profits while we keep using our paper straws. I might nod off so wake me up when it happens.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 4 points 16 hours ago

Lies. It’s gone.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

The planet has gone through numerous climate shifts, mass migrations, and extinction level events.

It's not what's fucked. We're fucked. The planet will keep spinning.

Even then, humanity is incredibly robust as a species. We'll have human descendants running around on the planet for a million more years. This pain we're setting up will be directly inflicted on the next two or three generations, as the global population evolves in the face of sever resource constraints.

We're looking at a highly acute crisis, geologically speaking.

[–] lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago

We're talking about human-accelerated climate change here. We're not talking about naturally-occurring events.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 16 hours ago

Even then, humanity is incredibly robust as a species. We’ll have human descendants running around on the planet for a million more years.

Yeah... Humans survived the last ice age. And that was with extremely limited technology, and a lot fewer of us to start with.

Extreme climate change might kill a lot of humans, but some of us will find a way to survive it. How much of our culture, civilization, and technology will survive to come out the other side is another question.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

You think natural disasters that kill thousands of people will get the attention of the American voter? Lol. Americans are dumber than rocks.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Even if the US suddenly started completely addressing climate change, fires will continue to get worse, probably at least for a few decades, likely indefinitely.

Because:

A) These systems have a lot of momentum. Change happens slowly. We're only beginning to feel the results of the damage that has already been done.

B) There's a whole rest of the world out there. The US is a major source of climate-changing emissions, particularly egregiously so when compared on a per-capita basis ... but the US isn't even half of global emissions. If the entire US suddenly went ultra-green and entirely carbon neutral, that wouldn't save the climate. It would slow things down a bit, but things would still continue to worsen.

That's part of the reason this problem is so difficult to address -- it's not a one country problem. It's a global problem. No single country -- not even the US -- can solve it on their own.

[–] lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It'd sure be nice if a country (like the US, for example) would step up and lead the way, though. One country outputting nearly half of global emissions is pretty insane when you think about it. Somebody has to set an example and take the lead. The US would be a fantastic country to take on that mantle.

But... we all know they won't - likely even with a president who isn't a senile whackjob with dementia. Instead, we see things like the US pulling out of the Paris accord. We're witnessing an active disinterest in solving this issue.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

The current regime just paid Germany 3billion to shut down their wind farms.

They do not care at all about the environment, only the money they get from oil industry.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

For those that will not benefit financially at all from Big Fossil, it is about performative bullshit about burning fossil fuel, because they don't want people thinking they are gay or feminine, because caring about the environment means UR GAY.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm other news: Water is LITERALLY Wet

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I hear from reliable sources (Lake Huron) that water is not wet. Water makes things wet.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

A third of the population and the three branches of government all are against making climate change adjustments to help stave up our destruction.

Kinda feel like We should fucking sue for threatening our lives in the daily...

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

People could reduce climate emissions a lot by changing what they put on their plates. Greatly reduce or eliminate consumption of animal products. It would take time to get a lot of people on board with it, but it’s possible.

70% of agricultural land is used for livestock. Shrinking or even eliminating that usage, and rewilding it, would help sequester a lot of carbon.

Consumption of animal products is at an all time high, with the USA leading the way. It’s ridiculous. Things like meat used to be a luxury. Human beings have survived just fine through generations with only small amounts of animal products. Heavy consumption of animal products with sedentary lifestyles also leads to lifestyle disease.

Every time I mention this, people immediately scoff, even leftists. That’s the problem. People can’t even be bothered to change their own habits out of want of pleasure and convenience. The government isn’t going to make it happen anytime soon. Even socialist governments prided themselves on how much animal products they could produce.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Every time I mention this, people immediately scoff, even leftists.

Wow, have I been there. I don't proselytize about what I eat (at all) IRL. I figure the best I can do is set a good example and be quiet about it. People don't care for a lecture and it's not going to sell anyone on being vegan, vegetarian, pescetarian, or even flexitarian.

So I almost never mention it unless asked about it. But the topic often comes up over a shared meal. I still have supposed leftists ask me why I'm a vegetarian or challenge things like drinking almond milk (because of water usage!), FFS. This question about almond water usage is sometimes while they are stuffing meat and/or dairy into their faces. 🤣 And of course, I get the unbelievable question - "where do you get your PROTEIN?" and try so very hard not to facepalm at this. Especially when this question was answered for the same person before.

I'm still eating animal products (eggs/dairy) but even that is something I've dialed way down over the years for a lot of reasons, including health.

The other thing that grows very tiresome is having some leftist men (and some women) subtly or not so subtly imply it's not as manly or not as "primal" to not eat meat. I mean, I get why conservative choads are fragile, but when it comes from leftists? Sigh. What the fuck are we even doing here? My guess is that propaganda about food is ever-present and given a huge assist from the government as well.

[–] joyjoy@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

The ~~beatings~~ wildfires will continue until ~~morale~~ energy generation improves