this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
1562 points (99.6% liked)

Work Reform

17551 readers
1173 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 155 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And still tries to decline your claims.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

There was that little bit of time we got some claims through. Something about an Italian plumber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 122 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If you were still wondering if the NYT shills for the oligarchs…

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well the title "Medicare For All Would Abolish Private Insurance" is true though.

The big question is why should we care? Why should this be our problem? Why should our hard earned money be used for profit instead working only as an insurance pool?

Things change, and one has to adapt (just look at the LLM crazy), same with insurance companies. They can similarly adapt and do something different, for example start offering non essential insurances that would be on top of the M4A. Not replacements though. Medicare "Advantage" should be abolished as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 3 weeks ago

Abolition would destroy the cotton industry! There is no precedent in American history!

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My wife needs a surgery thats likely to cost 18 to 20 grand without insurance, and I have to do some really careful math to figure out if putting her on my insurance would actually save us anything.

Most likely flying to Mexico for a week to get it done would be cheaper too.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm here waiting on insurance to approve a medication I need, like, eight months ago and which costs over a hundred thousand dollars per year (before insurance gets the negotiated price).

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

First set of pills was $483 with insurance. Bought the refill as uninsured, it was $38.

Our insurance industry is so broken it's really just unfathomable.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My grandfather needed some medication. Only 3 months, but over $400 a month. I found a Canadian pharmacy, bought 3 months of it, had the doctor fax the script there, and it was less than $300 for the 3 months. It was quite literally a lifesaver for him and their finances.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My brother spent eight fucking weeks with a constant migraine unable to walk or even stand up without falling over, before his insurance finally approved the MRI that discovered the golf-ball-sized tumor in his brain. Muigi Langione is all I can say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 62 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Stopping the orphan crushing machine would abolish the orphan crushing industry. There's no precedent in American history.

Medicare for All would save a trillion dollars and 114,000 American lives, both annually. Fuck the insurance racket.

[–] GeirGrusom@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Insurance in general should be a public aervice rather than private enterprise and it should not be used for medical care at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Womble@piefed.world 48 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

As well as this being stupid for the reasons given, its also just flat out wrong. There is no reason why you couldn't have additional healthcare insurance to act as a top-up/faster non-essential care/nicer facilities when you are in hospital. That's how it works in the UK, even with completely nationalized, free at the point of use healthcare there is still room for private insurance, it just has to earn its place rather than being a complete leach.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 16 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly this. Universal healthcare still leaves room for private facilities and insurance, it just forces a minimum standard on the market that they clearly don't want in the US

[–] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I will say though that the presence of private healthcare in the UK does make me very uncomfortable, especially with how much the NHS is struggling for money

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 17 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

It kinda feels like our postal service in the U.S.

They defund it, then complain about it, then start ranting that it "Doesn't even make a profit" even though the whole point is that it's supposed to be an affordable and accessible mail service.

They're even doing the same thing with schools. The entire conservo-righty playbook anymore is to get rid of our public services so they and their rich buddies have more to gain at our expense.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

kinda funny with post because if it was done totally privately the more rural and remote you get the higher the cost would be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep. Same in Australia.

I think 20 years ago an American would have told you they have the freedom to choose the level of cover they want, starting from none at all.

Now things have deteriorated through collusion or corruption or price fixing or whatever.

They've made so much money they have too much influence to do away with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

oh no, my private insurance, which only gave life saving measure to an astonishing number of people who are alive and thriving today because one of their CEOs got shot in the fucking face, deservedly

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

We have generations of data from countries all over the world with universal healthcare. It costs the people less, undeniably; there's zero benefit to for-profit private insurance... for people, anyway (not corporations).

I'm not positive, but I think USA is the last "western nation" without it. So... US taxpayers actually send billions to other nations all over the globe, all of which have better healthcare. Nice.

Even Mexico has universal healthcare, soon they'll be trying to end American migration...

Oh my God, it just dawned on me. Trump was right... Mexico will pay for the wall! Trump's lowering US citizen's standard of living severely so that they will have flee over the border by the millions and viola! Wall.

Brilliant.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

A national law against child labor was passed in 1916, but it was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1918. A 1919 law was also overturned. In the 1920s, an effort to pass a constitutional amendment failed, because of opposition from the South and from Catholics. The Fair Labor Standards Act (part of the New Deal) in 1938 finally ended child labor in factories, mines, and other occupations. Child labor has always been a factor in agriculture and that continues into the 21st century. — Wikipedia

Something tells me if we did a complete archive search of NYT (and, for that matter, WSJ), circa 1910-1940, we'd find that it has, indeed, defended child labor in the US.

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://flippedtips.com/plegal/save/clin1910s.html

Under "Stunned Nation Reacts" I guess they argued it should be left up to the states... Which is a defense of it, in the context of the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

It's also a flatout lie. It wouldn't abolish private insurance at all. Nytimes is dogshit journalism.

[–] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

A blatant lie as well, plenty of countries with universal healthcare sustain a private health insurance industry.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but admittedly, the sector would plunge in terms of revenues and profit. What will be left is much smaller than what they have today.

One of the biggest and longest rip-off scheme in history would end quite abruptly.

Now from an economic standpoint, that's as much money available to consumers that was previously going almost straight to shareholders with a limited return. That could be huge!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Abolishing slavery destroyed an entire industry too. There's your fucking precedent you piece of shit NYT blood sucker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hate when things that are obviously inefficient have to be supported just because they exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Forbidding orphan-crushing-machines would destroy the orphan-crushing-machine industry! The horror!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh now we care about precedents for some reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If everything had to have precedent, nothing would ever change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grainfed@quokk.au 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There are some things which should not be privatised. Several reasons, mostly conflict of interest. Government needs to run the country, so politicians, military, police, tax dept, national intelligence, national education and health are some things which run clear to my bleeding obvious state of mind. Oh and transport, imagine if people needed to buy their own land, to pay to build a road, to travel on. Heaven forbid, but just extrapolating extreme capitalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

remember when NYT made Sanders look like a far left radicalist

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 16 points 3 weeks ago

This post is crazy old shes probably paid over 130%

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That’s peak ignorance. Plenty of countries with universal heathcare have a thriving private medical insurance industry. The thing is they cannot force the scam level prices they do in the US, because private insurance is a ‘nice to have’ instead of a ‘must have’ thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Except in every civilized country in the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

NYT are a fascist mouthpiece

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I lost my job at the end of February, and have been enrolled in the affordable care insurance program ever since. Let me tell you, it's almost less than having no insurance. I got charged $1.1k for my COVID booster. I got charged full price for my dental cleaning. My current "insurance" has denied every single thing I've submitted. I still have to pay them $500 a week though. Want to talk to them on the phone to resolve claims? Good fucking luck.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Also, even with countries that have a public option private insurance is usually still allowed. There are zero good arguments against it and a lot of superfluous nonsense meant to muddy the waters.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

“Abolish?” Pshaw. People even have private insurance in the EU under full government healthcare.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

There is a precedent and it's called the VA. The military is the largest socialist organization in the US.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

Right, there's no precedent in American history for declaring an entire class of business to be illegal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States

I think you guys have maybe heard about this.

https://www.nytimes.com/1930/01/02/archives/prohibition.html

Oh hey look, yeah, you did!

You can not like it but can... can we not, with the blatant historical revisionism?

You could also just point out the Sherman AntiTrust Act, point at that, maybe.

Oh right we also banned gambling, tons of forms of gambling, back in the day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling_in_the_United_States

PASPA

I wonder what the kalshi odds are on that happening again...?

Anyway uh, the Old Gray Lady needs to go to fuckin' bed now, thanks.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Freedom for all would abolish private slave ownership and trade. There's no precedent in Roman history.

This is how dumb arguments like this one sound. Only a genocidal maniac could unironically spew nonsense like this.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

And NYT said Hitler was a reformed man after a brief stint in prison.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

There is no president in history of insurance being so expensive and worthless.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

medical costs with private healthcare are one third of my monthly costs. I actually did the math. Its not so much if you don't use it but my wife has medical issues and im getting old. It literally is a mortgage.

load more comments
view more: next ›