this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
359 points (97.9% liked)

News

23376 readers
4239 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman in North Carolina is suing a school district, alleging officials forced her children to switch schools while they experienced homelessness.

The suit from the mother, identified as K.L., claims Gaston County Schools; Lisa Phillips, state coordinator for Education of Homeless Children; and the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction failed her children when the district forced the children to leave their original schools while already facing the trauma of homelessness.

The 17-page lawsuit filed on Jan. 26 states K.L. was evicted from her residence in September 2023 while her children were students at New Hope Elementary and Cramerton Middle School.

With two children and nowhere to go, the suit states the disabled veteran mother switched both children to car riders while searching for steady housing. While the family remained in the same city, they were not located in the same school zone following the eviction.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 155 points 9 months ago (6 children)

The mother is a disabled veteran.

I'm not super pro-military or anything, but a veteran, especially a disabled veteran, deserves to be taken care of by the country they sacrificed for.

Obviously, the school deserves to be sued for what they did, but those kids should never have been homeless in the first place. They should have been housed by the U.S. military on the military's dime.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The military certainly has the money. Build a single less B-1 (or whatever the new hotness stealth airplane or destroyer is) and you could probably house every single homeless vet. Maybe every homeless person. Idk but those things are insanely expensive.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The F-35 program cost taxpayers $1.7 trillion.

But hey, at least they fly well enough for us to give them to Israel I guess...

[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Don’t be so naive, we need to spend all that money to protect Americans from global threats such as lack of affordable healthcare and affordable housing.

Wait

checks notes

Sorry we need to spend all that money to protect Americans from looks closer… there is something scribbled here does it say “axis of evil”? Next to it someone wrote “Iran” then scribbled it out and wrote “Iraq” and then it looks like it was scribbled out a second time to write “Iran” again?…

…Oh ok there we go it also says “Islamic Extremists”, well that is a good reason! Jeez after Bin Laden it has just been one ground invasion after another of jihadi ground troops on American shores. Thank goodness we didn’t spend that money on stupid government handouts. Remember when San Francisco didn’t build enough shore cannons to blow up ISIS landing boats and now that whole part of the country is gone? sigh and the liberals were SURE painting the cannons with LGTBQ colors was going to save them..

You know what really pisses me off as a conservative though? No one in this country respects veterans. Every time I go to get on a plane and the airline invites veterans to come on first, I clap beaming like the proud patriotic American that I am. When I look around though people around me are sometimes just on their phones and ignoring this opportunity to honor our veterans. Kids these days don’t even care about veterans and if you start honoring the service of our veterans with empty platitudes around millennials they don’t even respond they just want to talk about dumb shit like how we should at least give veterans free healthcare or affordable housing or childcare support.

Why does that shit matter? What do you think veterans want the government to just give them healthcare for free after they have fought so hard for the privilege of having to buy healthcare from corporations hellbent on cutting every single cost they can, quality of health services be damned? I feel like millennials just want to live in a communist hellscape where even the hospitals and schools are government run.

Those veterans fought for our country, don’t spit in their face by offering a hand to them, this is the proud and free land of the bootstraps where anybody can make it so long as they can make it. If you see a homeless veteran on the street, share a smile with them knowing that they not only fought for the freedom of you to succeed but also for them to fail and thus balance is preserved in this wonderful land of god.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Wake up, babe, new copypasta just dropped

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago (5 children)

This is 100% false. Pure disinformation. The $1.5T figure is for all costs associated with the program through to the aircraft's end of life in the year 2070.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 15 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I mean...Why the hell are we sparing 1.5 Trillion dollars of our future income on jet fighters when we won't spare even 10% of that on our own fucking people at home without a god damned 3 ring circus about how much we're already spending?

Do you not see the hypocrisy here?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or, hear me out here, we could spend $1.5T over 45 years to house the homeless. That's $33.3 billion dollars each year, every year.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But how does that immediately make Boeing richer? Think of their poor earnings.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Well, if Boeing built housing under contract for the government, they could make money that way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

The military is too busy misplacing and spending all their dime on things to hurt the poors.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm being honest here, there's actually a ton of housing support for homeless veterans. She'll have to take action to access that help of course, and that doesn't negate the trauma of getting evicted the entire family is experiencing, or the school district making it worse

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don’t know if this makes me a radical communist or something, but in my opinion, if you’ve served in the military, especially if you’ve become disabled during your time, you shouldn’t get assistance paying for a house.

Your house should be bought and paid for. 110% subsidy, to help pay for things that will inevitably be imperfect with the property; electrical issues, corroded pipes, outdated HVAC, security, CO detectors, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 131 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Can we at least agree that people should never be homeless? No?

Can we at least agree that disabled people should never be homeless? Still no?

How about veterans? Once again no.

Disabled veterans with children? Believe it or not, also no.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can we agree that the wealthiest country on Earth shouldn't have these problems?

Laughs in late-stage capitalism.

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

But think about those poor workers who won't be able to supply billionaires with yachts? What about their kids huh!?!

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No child should go hungry or miss out on an education. We have the resources to treat people better.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would you think of the CEOs' yachts?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Tbh, the fact you even mentioned veterans is really fuckin weird to most people.

What makes them any more deserving than anyone else? Because they killed brown people for oil money?

Just shows the level of brainwashing going on

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not that I think veterans are better people or anything. It's just that if I were to literally risk my life for some organization (such as the US government), I would expect that organization to show some fucking gratitude when I need help.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I really don't see why making their own decisions to risk their lives for money makes them any more deserving than a single mother or what have you

In fact, you could argue that the single mother is more deserving of everyone's help because all she did was exist; she didn't participate in destabilising half the planet

Am I not correct?

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It functions better as a foot in the door. R's love* veterans (*on paper). Get them benefits and work from there.

Incremental progress baby. It's unsatisfying and miserable, and still better than the alternative.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

The media loves to mention it for sympathy points but I think it's only being brought up here to point out the hypocrisy of the right who often speak highly of veterans in public but really don't give two shits about them.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Your take is so far off the mark. Conservative voices have screamed for decades about supporting the troops as some form of projected nationalism. This was all just fine until Trump came along and started being horrid to veterans, especially those who were captured, injured, or killed. Then Conservatives started becoming directly hostile towards veteran families.

The point here is that Conservatives chanted the chant but never got behind making life better for veterans. The person you are responding to simply pointed out this discordance.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is heartbreaking. Alone the fact that there is such a thing as "homeless children" is heartbreaking. The US really needs some help.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Nah, we good, we have god, guns, and nukes. 🫡🇺🇲

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Split representation in the House (72-48 in the state and 7-7 at the federal level, R favor), a 5-2 split in their supreme court (R favor) and 2 republican US senators (30-20 state level in the Republicans favor) is the reason why. Stop voting Red and your state won’t be so shitty towards people

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The ones voting R are okay with this outcome as long as others get hurt. Even if innocents get hurt

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Until it affects them personally, then they become very sad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

And then when their shortsighted policies affect them they blame "the government" as if it wasn't the very people they elected that caused it.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

With two children and nowhere to go, the suit states the disabled veteran mother switched both children to car riders while searching for steady housing. 

What the fuck does "car riders" mean in this sentence?

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Probably indicates that they won't be riding a school bus to school and will be dropped off and picked up by car.

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This sounds like a clear violation of the McKinney-Vento Act.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I believe the problems stem from public schools being funded indirectly by real estate values. That means you're discriminated against if your parents are poor. That the school makes it so explicit by kicking the children out as soon as possible is not just cruel, it's stupid too.

load more comments
view more: next ›