this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
617 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31071 readers
2712 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The late night host announced that his interview with the Texas Senate candidate will only air on YouTube

Jimmy Kimmel says that his interview with Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico will not air on TV after President Donald Trump’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) threatened Jimmy Kimmel Live!, ABC, their affiliates, and local stations.

During his Wednesday monologue, Kimmel said that while Talarico would stop by the show for an interview on Thursday, viewers at home won’t be able to watch it on broadcast television. Instead, the interview with the Democratic nominee has been relegated to YouTube.

“Tomorrow night, I’ll be interviewing James Talarico — tomorrow night, under unusual circumstances,” Kimmel began. “You know, for a lot of years, for the whole 20-plus years of our show, in fact, I’ve been interviewing Americans who are running for office with no problem at all, just like Letterman did, Leno did, Arsenio, et cetera, et cetera. I’ve interviewed a lot of political candidates from Hillary Clinton to Ted Cruz to Donald Trump himself.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

Can't wait for Vance or Musk to come to Europe to give us another one of their lectures on free speech... Because it's only free speech if it's hate speech, right lads?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 9 hours ago

Just put his interview on TV, and openly invite Paxton in for equal time. If he accepts - AWESOME! Interview the shit out of him. If he doesn't, tell the FCC to go fuck themselves, they tried.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 hours ago

I encourage everyone to go watch it

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I can’t tell if this is a Talarico/Dem stunt or if the republicans are really that dense and don’t understand the Streisand effect.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

or if the republicans are really that dense and don’t understand the Streisand effect.

That's where I'm putting my bet.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The same thing happened earlier this year with Colbert interviewing a political candidate

[–] OtterSec@infosec.pub 15 points 10 hours ago

The same candidate! It was also Talarico.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

I know that’s why it’s confusing.

His poll numbers skyrocket after that incident. He got a lot of free publicity as the “candidate republicans fear most”.

And then they decided “fuck it let’s do that again???”

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago

onto the web it goes, then

[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.social 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Might as well air it. I doubt Trump could shit his britches more than he already does 🚼

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's wild. What event was that from?

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

A funeral, but it's like 1 of many "OMG I smell shit" reaction faces from people near this shit demon. Just a few days ago he shit his pants again and the couch fucker got a big swift of it and it's a hilarious video.

https://www.reddit.com/r/antitrump/comments/1w9u28x/trump_%D1%95hit_his_pants_again/

[–] Alexfire@lemmy.world 61 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

They said the Dems would,

Take away first amendment,

Nope it was maga

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

You mean the free speech people are going to end free speech? Never!

You mean the Don't Tread On Me group are going to take a woman's right to choose away? Never!

You mean the anti-pedophile movement is going to protect pedophiles? Never!

You mean a corrupt businessman is going to enrich himself through the presidency? Never!

You mean the guy that wants to go to Mars is actually a space Nazi? Never!

Shit gets old after awhile.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] upandatom@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 73 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Kimmel should’ve called his bluff and done it anyway.

Don’t kowtow to these cowards.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 44 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sit there for 20 minutes repeating "Trump wouldn't allow this to be broadcast, here's what to search for on YouTube."

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 42 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Every time you obey these fascists in any way, it empowers them. While I appreciate his sensitivity towards the local networks (not so much towards ABC), every time you cave to these shits, it empowers them even more.

He missed an opportunity to create a lot more enemies for this administration. Everyone public figure should be giving a defiant middle finger to them. Trey and Matt did it and they’re billionaires for it.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

But more people are going to watch it now

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

While I appreciate his sensitivity towards the local networks (not so much towards ABC), every time you cave to these shits, it empowers them even more.

He missed an opportunity to create a lot more enemies for this administration. Everyone public figure should be giving a defiant middle finger to them. Trey and Matt did it and they’re billionaires for it.

Trey and Matt own South ~~Park~~ America. I'm pretty sure Kimmel doesn't own his Late Show, which is why he has to walk a tightrope

[–] starik@lemmy.today 26 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

[edit: whoops, thread has already come and gone anyway lol, feel free to ignore, I'd just delete (my own comment) cuz useless but that feels sneaky and weird]

Kinda is if Kimmel says "I'm not coming to work anymore until that goes on the air"

[–] starik@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What is the edit about? Did something happen?

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Haha totally sounds that way, my bad! Nah I just have a tendency to come along commenting on stale ass threads is all, just indicating I did that here.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I see. No worries.

You’d be surprised. Some of the more active threads will keep getting new comments for a few days. This one is only 15 hours old and still near the top of All-Active.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, cuz of dorks like me and the ensuing "discussion" 😂

Nah all jokes aside I get it, it's not that fast paced and it's a small place. I sometimes do it way more awkwardly but this wasn't really that, you right.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Only way is elbows up. Give the bully a bloody nose. It doesn't matter if you lose. He'll think twice next time and you might inspire others to stand up too.

[–] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 224 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (7 children)

I love how the freedom of speech crowd are the first to deny others th same.

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 86 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (9 children)

nothing scares these christofascist clowns like an actual Christian using Christ's teachings to tell everyone there's nothing Christian about Trump and his ilk, and I am 100% here for it. That's the only way we're ever going to deprogram a large portion of these MAGA morons, whenever this bullshit ends.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You greatly overestimate the power of Christ.

Source: Christians

[–] protist@retrofed.com 19 points 17 hours ago

They seem to be incredibly scared of Talarico's message, given this is the second time this has happened to him specifically. They should be scared, because his message is fucking incredible

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago

Paradox of Tolerance. Fascists leverage an open society to build political support, then close off the society as soon as they're in power.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 35 points 18 hours ago

Nazi America.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 124 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

It will probably get more views on YouTube anyway

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (7 children)

Literally what happened with the same politician being interviewed by Colbert during his primary. FCC told them they couldn't air the interview, they posted it on YouTube, Streisand Effect happens and it's one of the most viewed Colbert videos ever. It won him that election. I think Jasmine Crockett was a better candidate and she may have stood a chance had she gotten that level of exposure.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That’s the problem. There are a lot of people on Earth 2 who only get information the old-fashioned way. So Internet-savvy people, who probably already know how to find this kind of information, will be happy to have another choir-friendly preacher, but the people who most need to hear this now never will.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 28 points 18 hours ago

Literal evidence of chilling free speech. He is self censoring in response to threats of legal consequences by the government. It's the easiest, slam dunk court win on infringing on constitutional rights, but this executive branch and these judges are so extremist that it's still not a guaranteed win. This election really could be the last chance to reclaim some semblance of freedom.

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 14 hours ago

Make it public on yt and others like places, put link onto every actual show episode.

No air on tv, fine, making it public is not the same? (actually unsure, how local law sees that)

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago (10 children)

There seem to be some similarities to the Colbert incident. Talarico? They want to censor Talarico's views?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 29 points 19 hours ago

I watch it primarily on YouTube anyways so that works for me.

But still, what a fucking insecure rapist loser trump is.

load more comments
view more: next ›