Sure, a lot of it is exactly the same. Hormone treatments for men with low-T, hair removal or replacement, plastic surgery, etc. We don't trend to call it gender affirming care in cisgender people, but that's exactly what it is.
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
117 points (92.1% liked)
No Stupid Questions
50474 readers
1451 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yea. Most cosmetic procedures would count. I don't see how a woman getting breast implants is one iota different than a trans woman getting top surgery.
Most gender affirming care is for cis people, they just don’t want to admit it 😂
Are you stating that care that affirms your gender is gender affirming care?!?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yes.
Gynomastia is a thing that causes some boys to endure a lot of bullying in school. Erectile dysfunction causes issues for older men. The treatment for both of those conditions is gender affirming treatment.
Loads of others, too.
But more to the point, it should not matter why a person needs gender affirming care. That should be a decision between a patient and their doctors, not me, not you, and not the government.
Look at any tough-guy gym... There'll be testosterone offered to make you a "real man".
Or breast implants for women who want bigger boobs. Those are both designed to help cis folks feel more like they're the man/woman they think they need to be.
Which is why if gender affirming care is ever outlawed in my purple/red state, I'm going to be reporting the fuck out of the maga gym near by.
load more comments
(21 replies)
I had breast cancer. The chemo and mastectomy were cancer care. The reconstruction of my breast is not cancer care, it is gender affirming care, having two breasts affirms my gender as a cis woman.
Reconstruction is not necessary at all for cancer care and in fact causes more surgeries than if I was to just have the cancer removed and go on the rest of my life with one boob.
They just don't call it "gender affirming" care if you are cis, they just call it healthcare.
I have some many questions.... feel free to answer as many as you want, if any at all:
- Where does the breast tissue come from?
- How does one sculpt a nipple?
- Are they as sensitive as before? I mean, on the receiving end of stimuli, does it feel like an organically grown whole grain breast, or is it more like... uh... elbow skin? I have no idea how the neuroplastics would work..
- Does having breast cancer on one side automatically increase the chances of cancer on the other side? I would think symmetry isn't a given?
- Were you allowed to choose size and shape? (If so, did you go for the tried and true original, or somethingelse entirely?)
- Hope you're doing well today. Not a question, I just wanted to say (write) it. Live long and prosper.
Sorry for the stupid questions, but of all places I feel this is a safe space for them..
There is a lot of different answers to these questions, I'll give you the jist, then my specific answer.
Where does the breast tissue come from?
There is two main ways to do reconstruction - the most comment is breast implant. In this case they remove all of the breast tissue and leave just the skin. The remaining space is filled with a implant and the size of the implant is determined by how much skin you have. The second way it can be done is to transplant tissue from another part of your body to the breast area, it is usually from either the belly area (DEIP Flap) or from the back area (TRAM Flap). This type of surgery requires the surgery match up the tissue transplant on a vascular level (vein by vein) to make sure the transplanted tissue does not die.
I had a DEIP flap reconstruction - it requires almost a week hospital stay due to how complex the surgery is and recovery is 6-8 weeks, but honestly its been just about a two years and I am still recovering and also I have an additional revision surgery that I still need because - no I am not even close to being even.
How does one sculpt a nipple?
They typically do not. Normally the nipple is removed entirely. In the reconstruction I have heard of the nipple being rebuild but, its not nipple tissue, so its not the right color and it cannot react to environmental stimuli and from what I've seen, gets stuck sort of "hard". When the nipple is removed most people will opt for a tattoo replacement. They look very very real and you don't have the issue permanently smuggling raisins around. I was able to keep my nipple, visually it looks like a nipple, but I can no longer feel it.
Are they as sensitive as before?
No they lose all sensation, can't even feel the skin, so not even like elbow skin, totally numb. They had to rebuild my stomach and belly button, so I also cannot feel anything across my lower abdomen either.
Does having breast cancer on one side automatically increase the chances of cancer on the other side? I would think symmetry isn't a given?
No, the risk of recurrence is the same. If I was to have the same type of cancer in my other breast it would be a recurrence, not new cancer and after treatment my risk of recurrence is lower than my chance of getting a totally new type of cancer.
Were you able or allowed to choose size and shape? (If so, did you go for the tried and true original?)
Short answer no, long answer I was not very well endowed to begin with and my reconstruction was limited by the amount of tissue I could use for transplanting. So, again no and also they aren't both the same size anymore, the reconstructed one is quite a bit smaller and not really the right shape, which is what I am going back in for more surgery to fix. If you had way more breast tissue than I did, there is more options for reconstruction, but from the woman I have talked to, most people end up going smaller or staying the same. Going up larger brings in a lot of complication and can only happen if you get a implant reconstruction and not a transplant.
Hope you're doing well today. Not a question, I just wanted to say (write) it. Live long and prosper.
Thanks I plan on it 🖖
Just want to also point out for readers that this entire comment is only about gender affirming care and has nothing to do with medically treating cancer, but because we are affirming my breasts for my gender as a cis woman, its just healthcare.
Thank you for this. I still have many questions but at least they're fewer now.
Also, "smuggling raisins around" is a new favorite term of mine
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is this a joke question? Like others have pointed out, gender affirming care is even more popular among cis people than trans.
On an absolute scale sure, because most people are cis. But on a per person scale is it more popular for cis people? This is purely anecdotally speaking, but the only people I personally know who've had gender affirming care are trans
I sincerely doubt that. Almost every plastic surgery that's not a result of a disfiguring accident is gender affirming care. Viagra is gender affirming care. From hair plugs to Corvette is gender affirming care.
This is definitely because a lot of cis ppl don't even know that what they are doing is gender affirming care.
Getting Viagra is GAC. Cis men don't love talking about how they got out on Viagra or need T shots or gels.
Women going through menopause and being given HRT to manage the symptoms are getting GAC. They don't call it that, but that's what it is.
Your argument is deeply flawed, like people who insist that autism didn't exist 100 years ago. It definitely did! We just didn't call it that. Just because you don't call it that, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
"Low T" treatment, hair loss drugs, little blue ~~pulls~~ pills (in some situations), etc.
penis enlargment surgery, even if its extremely risky and somewhat botchable. leg legthening surgery, is probably extreme, even with modern techniques. now looksmaxxing, people are obsessed or trying to consider JAWS SURGERY, probably for both jaws for seeing problems that arnt actually there, seems its thier first go-to for extreme rather than even plastic surgery.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
For men: hair plugs, Rogaine, testosterone replacement therapy, those compression vests Inget advertised on YouTube.
For women: botox, breast enlargement, Brazilian butt lift, laser hair removal, hormone replacement therapy,
That's a shirt list off the top of my head.
Men can also need a mastectomy if they start developing breasts due to some medical condition or hormodal issues. Something called gynecomastia .
This one is very common is cis-het men. Know people in Trump country that have had it done.
Penis enlargement, testicular implants, implants to look more muscular
What about those little blue pills?
Even gas stations can provide something like that. Totally unregulated, of course.
Never heard of viagra, penis enlargement surgery, breast enlargement surgery, lip filler, botox etc?
People take hormones for non-transition reasons too.
Yeah, Hair restoration. Testosterone therapy. I think you might have been joking but that's what those are classified as
load more comments
(3 replies)
Well, yeah. I'm a cis woman who takes oestrogen because they removed my ovaries; I do so for gendered reasons, there's a reason why I don't take testosterone instead which would be an equally valid way of replacing my missing hormones from a physiological perspective. I also shave my face for gendered reasons, because people are a lot more judgemental about women having facial hair than men. Cis men who are born with penises but lose them get phalloplasty. And so on.
menopause = hrt.
all for the crime of being born with ovaries and daring to age out of the use of them.
Viagra/cialis/etc and testosterone supplements if your numbers are “low” are the most common for men.
Gynecomastia surgery seems like it'd fit the category.
Testosterone and estrogen supplements, dick pills, breast augmentation.
Thats just off the top of my head. Trans people are demonized for things cis people do every day
I have a testosterone gel I apply daily and get regular blood tests to monitor my hormones.
Gave me chest hair, thicker facial hair, and decent erections.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Sure. I am past menopause and take low dose hormones (more to avoid migraines and stay healthy than to be more 'feminine' but could take more, a lot of doctors do try to reach some level, mine does MHT not HRT ).
Middle-aged guys, yes, I think testosterone is certainly gender-affirming care, and there is no MHT equivalent for men, testosterone requires blood tests, you can't just find the lowest dose that relieves symptoms, they always aim for some level in the blood. The Viagra/Cialis I think is more to correct for a problem. Or for recreation.
We call it "hormonal treatment" around here, my mom is doing it.
I've heard multiple times that using testosterone supplements degrades your body's ability to make testosterone naturally. So once you start using supplements you always have to use them. Otherwise they sound interesting. Just a few injections and I can type in ALL CAPS whenever I want? Sign me up.
if you already naturally make low T amounts, TEST supplementation wouldnt affect that anyways. its the people who are anabolic steroids, or the rever estrogen. some people will go as far to use Synthetic INSULIN too.
Yes it exists. It can be adjusting testosterone/estrogen if not at good level, hair transplant, etc But I only know the surface level, not really the details much
Frankly, as a trans person, I'm not a fan of the term. I didn't get treatment to "affirm my gender." I changed my sex. I literally changed my sex. I didn't get "gender affirming treatment" or whatever the new entry on the euphemism treadmill is we're supposed to use this year.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Erectile dysfunction medication, prostate care, testosterone suppliments and male hormone medications and treatments, and plenty of other things along those lines would certainly qualify as gender affirming care.
yes. from as small as hair transplants to blue chews. heck even the mil will give low t soldiers shots.
Yes and no.
While a wide range of medical treatments could be called that with 100% real world accuracy and validity, that isn't how the term "gender affirming care" is used by doctors on a regular basis at this point in time. That might change in the future, but you're asking about now, and about asking a physician.
So, in the current world, that doctor is going to wonder what kind of fuckery you're pulling, and likely find a way to avoid you in the future.
Gender affirming care has a narrow range of definitions medically currently. None of those definitions include treatments that are related to a person that has congruency with their assigned gender. Things like hormone supplementation for cis women or men just isn't that. Gynecomastia treatments aren't gender affirming care either.
Is it in the process of changing to where that is part of the medical usage of the term? Kinda, but it's changing from the outside in, so I'm dubious it'll be a dominant usage any time soon.
See, if you're cis, all medical care is gender affirming to some degree. Some of that is stretching the concept to the breaking point, but the core of the term is about providing care that modifies the body from one's assumed gender to that which matches the internal gender. In other words, if you aren't trans or non binary, or some other flavor other than cis, the care isn't transformative in the same way. It just isn't. Hrt during menopause has a different goal and a different application than hrt for transition on a medical level.
No matter how we use the term colloquially, there is absolutely a difference between colloquial usage and in-jargon usage of any term. In this case, the colloquial usage is being shifted because it radically cruel and morally wrong to deny care to those in need of it for transition when the exact same meds and procedures are often covered by insurance for cis people. The difference between the application of modalities is irrelevant on a social level because no matter that the goal of the treatment is different, it is still a treatment that not only improves lives, it saves them.
But, again, that is not the same thing as current usages within medicine. It'll take time and effort to change that.
Edit: the other part of your question is what would that care look like. The part about the doctor wondering what kind of fuckery you were pulling is the real answer.
That being said, if it wasn't, and the terminology did change, then what you suggested is likely to be the first thing. Your hormone levels would be tested and, if not adequate for function, supplemented. Secondary to that, you would need to consult a cosmetic surgeon for any appearance related issues.
load more comments
(5 replies)
I think one of the most common procedures that align with this, would be surgery to address gynecomastia. Its a fairly widespread procedure.
view more: next ›