this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024

432 points (96.4% liked)

News

23297 readers

3715 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

dezmd@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

432

The soft life: why millennials are quitting the rat race (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ambition once came with a promise: a home, a salary, progress and fulfilment. What happens when that promise is broken? Meet the women who are turning their backs on consumerism, materialism and burnout

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 158 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Completely ridiculous that they quoted Kim Kardashian...

The soft life approach is not without its critics. In 2022, Kim Kardashian infamously claimed that women need to “get your fucking ass up and work” as “it seems like nobody wants to work these days”. She was forced to apologise – after it was pointed out that coming from a rich, already-famous family in LA would have its advantages in the job market.

But I never liked how this movement picked up the name "lazy girl job". Bros can be lazy too...

I could have pulled in 6 figures after the Navy, but it would have been a shitty job that I fucking hated.

So I went back to school, got a degree that interests me, did that for a few years, then got a cushy decently paid office job that didn't care what my degree was about.

I'm not maximizing my income, but I also essentially get UBI because I'm a disabled vet.

I'm basically living the progressive dream. And if everyone got the stuff I did, we'd be happier and more productive as a society. Along with a shit ton less crime, because people have something to lose.

Our current hyper capitalist society only works for people like Kim Kardashian that start out wealthy and connected, and those idiots constantly insist the only reason they're wealthy is they work harder. I was doing manual labor before I was a teenager. There's no way in hell Kim has worked a single day harder then I did as a child, but she legitimately believes she busts her ass, all the wealthy elites do.

Because they're surrounded by people they pay to tell them what they want to hear, and everyone else is a "hater".

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 43 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Kim Kardashian is only rich because she sucked a dudes dick and made a sex tape of it, pretty much with the hopes it would be leaked and make her famous.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It wasn't even her plan...

She was Paris Hilton's assistant (still no idea why she needed an assistant) when her sex tape legitimately leaked, and Kim saw her go from an fairly anonymous rich girl to nationally famous overnight.

And wanted to follow suit.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

To be fair, plenty of sex tapes have leaked or "leaked" with a lot of noise over the years, very few people have translated them to massive wealth (games, reality shows, modelling, branding, appearances etc). Whoever is managing them (their mum perhaps?) is very smart in at least that they know how to leverage opportunity, and they're smart enough to listen to that person.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Her father was also one of the highest-earning crim defense lawyers.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 7 months ago

Who became famous for being a defense lawyer for the most watched murder trial in history.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago

She's famous because her parents were famous, and her family made a pointed campaign to continue making money off of reality tv and being proto-influencers.

Like it or not, a lot of people genuinely enjoy reality TV as entertainment and having characters to watch and gossip about. Kim K is in the entertainment industry.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Same ship, different service. The safety net affords me the ability to find what I really want to do without tying my life to a single job or place.

I also think that it can be brought to other citizens through other community activities. Why don't we offer similar incentives to teachers? 10yr of teaching in exchange for UBI. Or doctors. Or rebuilding the crumbling infrastructure.

I'm guessing that your VA/service income doesn't just go straight to savings either. A lot of it goes right back into the economy through purchasing and associated taxes paid on those things. At least mine does.

The US military is the largest socialist organization in the world and I wish they would extend that to the rest of its citizens without the downside of PTSD, death, and a lifetime of physical and mental ailments.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's essentially BAH lol.

Every year it goes up, and every year I make it my new monthly payment for my mortgage.

The US military is the largest socialist organization in the world

I say this all the time, it's 100% true.

The vast majority of our issues would disappear if everyone got that stuff. And we could pay for it all just be taxing the 1% of wealthiest people and corporations.

The only reason to not want it, is if those wealthy people give you a shit ton of money to not want it.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've thought this for a while, but maybe our service to country isn't done with a DD214. The current situation in the US and world at large makes me think I can still do some good. Maybe politics needs more people who think like you and me.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I got told once in the military:

If you don't want to be in charge of a bunch of idiots, one of those idiots is gonna be in charge of you.

And it's pretty accurate, even on the civilian side.

[–] hibsen@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Politics definitely needs people who think like both of you.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 115 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My biggest regret in life was working hard for an employer who didn't care for me. I now work in public sector and know that I am making the world a better place, and that pleases me. I got out of the rat race and now have some level of comfort.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad to hear that you're doing better. I've found that public sector can be more stressful in some domains, because of how overstretched services are nowadays, but like you say, at least you're striving for more than just lining someone else's pocket

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

I am also in a good position--I work in higher education, so not quite the same as state or local government, which has different challenges.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 93 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why run if there's no more a carrot dangling from the string?

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And the treadmill is accelerating on top of that as well.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And there was never a carrot in the first place. It was a turd painted orange

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's multi-pronged:

why put in effort for companies that will run you into the ground to save a fraction of a %, give you "raises" that don't even cover inflation and never adjust to market rates, or will fire you at will?
why work hard when the social contract has been severed; when the entire system is designed to funnel wealth to the richest, and return the working class to a feudalist underclass of renters.
why save for a future family when you can't ever have housing or economic security, and the system is hellbent on maintaining the status quo despite the fact it may create a lifetime of famine, war, and suffering for the children we already can't afford.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

why work hard when the social contract has been severed;

There never was this. We had strong unions from the 1930s until the late 1970s. Since then, it's been non-stop capitalism fests.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's because the job wasn't finished. People thought we could negotiate with capitalists.

Sure you can get a peace deal, just like you can get one with putin. The 1% kept soaking up the stolen surplus labor value, and have used that power and wealth to take us right back to the gilded age. when the time comes, no reforms... just a new way of life. We tried reforms yall. It did not work

[–] dumples@kbin.social 82 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think millennials and zoomer are just being open and honest about things that always happened. We love labels and with the Internet talks with other like-minded people. There have always been people who worked 9 to 5 at a job and prioritized stability over money. We are being open and bragging about it. We just want to break the hustle culture that was always a loud subset

For example my dad a peak boomer worked at the same company for his whole career and turned down "promotions" that gave a manager title with little more money. They have always been there

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 89 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The problem is, you used to be able to comfortably live that life. Now if you stay at the same company, your wages won't increase at a rate to sustain your life style. Companies care way more about acquiring talent than retaining talent, so you need to move around to make enough money

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 7 months ago

And this is why being part of a bargaining class/union is important, none of this making less than new hires doing the same thing, your wages go up with the cost of living so even if you don't get raises, you still don't fall behind inflation

[–] dumples@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I know. But that was the equivalent of jumping every few years to a similar but slightly paying more role. Not grinding to get the biggest promotion and title as possible.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

At some point, you end up wanting some stability and the constant jumping gets old. Perhaps you finally hit a target salary that makes you go "well I guess that's enough".

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Except that you wont get eaises to that salary to maintain your current atandard of living. Getting a 2% annual raise with 4% annual inflation is an annual pay cut. They only way to maintain the current standard is to get a new job every few years, or just quit playing the game.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

You can get stability through community and friendship. The idea that you need a big salary makes sense because of how we have been raised, to live independently in little units, and it's scary to switch to a less independent life, but it is possible.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think millennials and zoomer are just being open and honest about things that always happened.

This is partially true, but things are actually worse than they used to be in some ways and better in others. I think that, more than anything, the conditions have accelerated a bit more.

I was born in 1976. I remember managers being completely toxic assholes--that was just how it was. But, when I was a kid, there were still pensions--you worked 40 years for a company and they took care of you. I think that both of these things are gone--managers can't really get away with being as cruel as they used to, though I know that's out there. Also employees don't expect a graceful exit at the end of their career.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Millennials and gen z know things are worse, and that's why we don't feel like it's worth it to give everything to a company. We don't have to pretend because we know the employers know things are bad.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Companies expect you to slog your guts out for the false promise of a reward. But being a hard worker, at least in my environment, just means you get the hardest work.

I've had the biggest pay rises by changing job. There's no reason to be ambitious and stay loyal to a company that will run you ragged and offer very little in return.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

Unfortunately that's only really true for white collar work. Most factory/trade schmucks like myself get massive pay cuts when we move jobs...

I've been in the same cycle for almost 15 years now... Work 5 years, get raises, have to move, huge pay cut, work 5 years, get back to first exit salary, have to move, huge pay cut, etc etc...

I get sooooo bitter when I see already well paid people talk about getting 30-40% more when changing jobs... Like good for them, but man are things not even in that respect at all. :(

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 6 points 7 months ago

It's also really hard to jump when you work a niche job. The pay is basically flat no matter where you go and there isn't really anywhere to turn.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 44 points 7 months ago

I don't think that people voluntarily give up, I believe that they are more burnt out etc than ever

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 40 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Once again this X-er is cheering for how aware Millennials and Zoomers seem to be compared to how oblivious I was through my first several decades. Trying to figure out a (non-catastrophic) way out of the rat race myself.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Speaking as a child of the late 1970s, this was my experience. We had nobody to look at or talk with this about, it was just Boomers being Boomers and pretending that 1995 was no different than 1975. They really just expected us to hustle and get ahead, when THEY WERE THE ONLY GENERATION IN HISTORY THAT THIS WORKED FOR. It took the 2000 and 2008 crashes before people could actually speak about it.

Make no mistake: the world is now a better place BECAUSE people are talking about this.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago

They didn't even hustle. Boomers grew up in basically the only industrialized country that hadn't been bombed to fuck. Good jobs fell into their laps.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago (5 children)

My job is cozy and not too stressful. Its a shame I will have to quit in a few years once inflation catches up again. I'd stick around if wages stay livable but that's a strech.

Still living paycheck to paycheck but it seems best I can do. Worse, im afraid if getting pushed up to the bosses seat. Im not trying to move up unless its life changing money. I don't know the pay, but I dealt with being on call before and that was hell. Last thing I need is to burn out , I don't know if I can live through that again.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago (11 children)

yeah I hate the bs of trying to push management stuff on ya when its not part of the job you signed up on. Certainly aint doing it without a hefty pay increase. Why do all the bootstraps folks not want to pay for anything. I mean I know why. They did not get rich by writing checks.

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

wasn't the Xer stereotype a slacker that did not really run the race?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This is because the parents of Boomers invested in their children but Boomers did not invest in their children. We were shat out and expected to get a job and "just do it" without support.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but that stereotype was only because we didn't have families or places of our own to take care of yet. We got older and almost all of us (not me, tho) joined the race alongside everyone else.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

Getting laid off from my tech job was both the scariest and most freeing moment in my life. It's been over a year now and I've transitioned into doing just a few hours of contract work.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

It's really all about defining what "success" means. And "Ambition". I've always looked at "ambition" as a negative trait, at least among my peers in the workplace. Someone who is ambitious will not hesitate to step on me if it gets them further up the ladder. But someone who is happy in the role they have, and doesn't always have their focus on the next thing, will be a much better team player.

That doesn't mean having no goals whatsoever, or never learning anything new. But it does mean establishing your own goals, that bring you your own fulfillment. And if they don't coincide with what your boss wants, that doesn't make you a bad person, it might just make the job a bad fit.

[–] seriousconsideration@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago

The social contract was broken decades ago. What is the point of trying to build up society when that society is constantly moving the goalposts? Society wouldn't be able to function if everyone was a doctor or lawyer or hedge fund manager, why do we act like people who earn less than 100k a year don't deserve a house, access to education, access to healthcare, and access to healthy food and clean water?

load more comments