this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
302 points (95.8% liked)

News

37527 readers
1403 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit:

  • article title update, bump not bomb jolt'
  • added comma

DENVER — An engine cover on a Boeing 737 operated by Southwest Airlines ripped open just after taking off from Denver International Airport Sunday morning.

The Houston-bound Southwest flight took off from DIA around 7:45 a.m., and returned to the airport 30 minutes later, landing safely. No injuries were reported.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 131 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It's almost like overworking people in the name of profits gets in the way of safety snd reliability.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago

What are you, some kind of socialist?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

Hey Karl Marx, preventing needless death isn’t profitable! Enough.

Thank god the wealthy control the courts and government, at least. They’ll keep the lid on this rabble-rousing.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

Keep in mind they literally do not care until it gets in the way of profit

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

They tied bonuses directly to how many planes were delivered. Definitely a good way to promote cutting corners.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 61 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It has been said a lot these last few months, but it is worth repeating untill Boeing stops dicking around...

"It is Boeing, I ain't going"

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 39 points 2 years ago (7 children)

It's also important to try to avoid jumping to conclusions without the facts. If this is a new 737 and there's a manufacturing issue, then rake Boeing over the coals. They do have problems. But if this is an older plane that had either maintenance issues, then go after Southwest first unless it's a Boeing responsibility. And of course, things do happen beyond anyone's control too, and engines that fail for any reason but don't take out the rest of the aircraft is a bit of a win for design.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 years ago

It's not new. Is also not a Max. Airframe is from 2015.

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/386398

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eh, I am still not going if it is Boeing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Neat. Now compare vs Airbus and see all those different compartments become meaningless.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The story doesn’t mention the age or variant of the plane, but there’s a good chance this is an issue with Southwest maintenance, not Boeing (or their subcontractors) construction.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some quick googling got me the details.

  1. The article mentions the flight number.
  2. Since I didn't know the airline code of Southweast, I googled Southwest and the flight number.
  3. Google flights showed me the full flight number.
  4. Putting that into Flightradar got me a list of the last flights of this flight, one showing a deviation.
  5. Going in there gave me the registration number of the plane that flew that flight and data about the type of plane.
  6. Searching FAA registry gave me all details of the plane.

It is a Boeing 737-8H4, delivered in 2015, so an alomst decade old plane, meaning it was probably an issue with maintenance this time.

Doesn't mean I would fly a Boeing plane untill the stop dicking around.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (7 children)

How would they stop dicking around with a plane sold to Southwest 9 years ago?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They wouldn’t but then people ragging on Boeing are also correct. So.

Shall we all wait for the next disaster? Keep scrolling to find out!

Hey what was that union that Reagan destroyed to avoid paying them? I forget.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Boeing killed John Barnett!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What other options are there for domestic US flights?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://simpleflying.com/ten-busiest-domestic-us-airbus-a321neo-routes/

Plenty.

Then you guys also have sleeper trains in some regions, not at the same level as here in Europe, but they exist and are a decent alternative to flying on the routes.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

They're not decent alternatives. They're much slower, more expensive, and go far fewer places. I would love to take a train instead of flying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Looks at post title and wonders if Boeing

Opens article

Is Boeing

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You do know that this has nothing to do with it being a Boeing aircraft, right? The flight was a 737-800 which is from the NG series of 737s. The NG series has one of the lowest accidents per departure of any aircraft ever made and they probably have the most departure of any aircraft series.

This was 100% on Southwest. This aircraft was built in 2015 and has been flying for a decade. All that happened was a Southwest mechanic didn't latch the engine cowling properly after an at gate service. This is a problem and should not happen, but has nothing to do with Boeing.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the Ohio train derailment all over again. Accident happens, people pay more attention to similar accidents, they are shared more on social media (especially if they confirm what people now this is true), people not smart enough to understand that hearing about it more does not mean it's happening more, and so every accident confirms their belief no matter what.

It's a vicious feedback loop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Even if you discount the airlines responsibility in this, Boeing don't make the engines., CFM International do.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I mean half are boeing and half are airbus. We aren't exactly swimming in large airplane manufacturers.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

It’s a Boeing that has been flying for years. Maintenance staff forgot to latch the engine cowling. That is all.

Airbus used to have a way larger problem with this, so bad they had to redesign it to make it more obvious it wasn’t latched.

https://safetyfirst.airbus.com/preventing-fan-cowl-door-loss/

[–] SillyPuppy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Southwest Airlines uses Boeing aircraft exclusively. Lucky me gets to try my luck in two weeks. 🙄

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (22 children)

Thousands of Boeing flights happen every day. Statistically, you'll be fine.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The article doesn't say "bomb jolt" it says "bump, jolt." In case no one actually reads the article.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Thank you, luckily Lemmy let's you edit titles @jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lemmy lets you edit comments, too!

(I hate autocorrect sometimes...I don't know why mine keeps changing lets to let's and other similar things...)

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Mine is bad because I rely on my generally good swipe typing more than I should. But if others notice and comment before I do I just let it be.

[–] theblackbox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I read this as "lets* you idiot" and thought gee, the grammar police is getting increasingly hostile

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Oh hey look it’s a Boeing plane again.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

goddamn planes are falling apart no matter who the fuck makes or services 'em. I am slowly but surely losing trust in air travel at the moment.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, all recent coverage seems to have been about Boeing planes..

..but stuff like this is likely more due to shoddy maintenance than production faults, right?

It’s just that everyone is hyper-vigilant currently for anything that goes wrong on a Boeing flight currently.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

but stuff like this is likely more due to shoddy maintenance than production faults, right?

yes exactly. you nailed it of course, it's the same thing like when you buy a car and then you see it everywhere. Human brain likes to connect patterns when possible so anything Boeing is like, 'there they go again!' when in reality it's poor maintenance. Part of why Alaska Airlines has looked real bad with all this stuff, bad maintenance like you said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TripleTed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Noob question: In this age of connected things, why can't the plane have a sensor to detect if the engine cover is closed, and show an error if it is not before flying?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

They absolutely have sensors that say “hey, the engine cover is reporting open” but it comes down to where they are when they get that report. I highly doubt the cover was open when they took off, and there’s not going to be a “the engine cover is going to open soon” sensor for this kind of situation.

load more comments
view more: next ›