this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
115 points (93.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35535 readers
5458 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...fuck, I'm old.....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I'm so conflicted about Jim Carey. On one hand, he's a based socialist, on the other, he's an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist idiot.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 16 points 22 hours ago

He's also monumentally depressed.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Have you seen the Kaufman documentary? IMO Carey is certifiably insane, he spat on someone and refused to apologize because it wasn't him, it was Andy. He literally thought he was possessed, or at least acted like that's what he thought

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

To be fair I think that method acting requires you to let go of your conceptual self, so I can see why Carey wouldn't necessarily think it was him, if he was in character.

To clarify: I don't think there's necessarily anything happening which is particularly interesting neurologically, but it is to say that I don't think the act of spitting on someone is necessarily the asshole move. I think the asshole move is to commit yourself to staying in character. There's something to be said for whether the commitment itself is worth it as an actor, and whether actions could be excused or forgiven, but I'm not here to make those points.

Where I am here to say is that Carey's choice to commit to staying in character makes him responsible for the impact and outcomes on other people.

It makes me think of Jared Leto, who was probably just trying a bit too hard, and sent dead rats to his co-stars or something?

I think that's a case of trying to bootstrap method acting but was certainly not very convincing. I think there's a case to be made that 'Leto' was responsible for that one. I'd call it "cosplaying at being obnoxious". In this case, I'd say Leto is responsible for those actions.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (3 children)

people are complex and can be right about some things and wrong in others, nuance exists.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I had this with the youtuber and investigative journalist Johnny Harris. He has some good videos where he does deep dive investigative journalism but then in other videos he hears something and just accepts it as fact. For instance, in his video on who is Elon Musk he accepts what Musk said about his history as fact and didn't check any of it. Or he uses multiple sources all leading to the same source: Musk. So the entire video is a big Musk circlejerk promo video. But with other videos he doesn't accept something that easily and goes really deep to find the truth. So I googled the guy, apparently he's a devout Mormon. How can I take this guy seriously with anything if I can't trust him to check his sources properly every time, when some things are just what he believes and accepts without doubting any of it. I mean, the guy believes in fairy tales, and really weard one too. So all of his material becomes junk as it's really hard to disect the good journalism from the bad yourself, without doing all the research yourself completely. He's a selective journalist, not an investigative one. But it took a while to spot the twisted info he produces. I followed him for a while and though he delivered proper investigations until he made videos on something I specialized in and he made critical errors while stating it as fact. This is, in my opinion, one of the most dangerous fake news forms out there. It even fooled me, while I'm not easily fooled.

[–] barlescharkley@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

He's definitely not a devout Mormon. He previously was, but then left the church.

He actually has a good series of videos on that. Recommend a watch.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

I don't trust anything he says.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

[from memory]

I stopped following him when he made a propaganda sponsored video without saying who paid for it. that's not a 'being wrong in some thing and right in others' that's more like the guys can't be trusted.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Back in the day, people relied on main stream media that fact checked everything.

Then Ronald Reagan, Roger Ailes, and Rupert Murdoch came along.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Back in the day, people relied on main stream media that "fact checked" everything.

there was likely less fake news, but still not perfect?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Let me put it this way. The movie 'Network' went from being a cutting edge satire to a quaint docudrama in real time.

[–] bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

I'm Dan Rather and I approve this message

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But as an internet commentator I am morally obligated to either stan them or hate them!

As a data scientist, I recommend not to run dimensionality reduction analysis on people.

Furier transforms are OK though

[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is pretty much everyone.

yeah, it's obvious, yet somehow people are always surprised

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah, but if I had to choose between him and Adam Sandler I would go Jim any day of the week.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't rush to Jim, though.

I'd go...at a medium pace...

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I prefer Jims acting and the roles he's chosen, but Adam seems like he's probably a nicer person.

[–] pendel@feddit.org 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Adam Sandler is a Zionist it hardly gets more nasty than that

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

On the other hand, if all zionists were like Zohan then the middle east would be a much more pleasant place.

[–] pendel@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It’s a horrible movie that is

  1. not funny; ok that’s subjective but I really don’t think Adam Sandler is funny independently of his political views
  2. reducing crimes against humanity such as genocide, colonialism and apartheid to "people just need to get along“ which is a common liberal Zionist narrative to whitewash said crimes
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its an Adam Sandler song reference..."At a medium pace".

Imo peak Sandler music. Everyone remembers Lunch Lady Land and Thanksgiving and Chanukah Song because they are (mostly) family friendly and get played on the radio sometimes.

At A Medium Pace will not get played on legit terrestrial radio. It is probably not family appropriate, unless your family has a traveling act called "The Aristocrats". That's that raunchy, cringey Sandler we all know and love and sorta miss but we know he's too old to really do it anymore and it wouldn't be genuine but he's still pretty good in romcom settings.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Movies.

But this is a very niche joke based Animals in HBO dedication an entire episode+ to litigating Sandler vs Carrey

Basically trying to start a war in the comments

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Rich people are only socialist until someone tries to redistribute their wealth. It's all an act.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Vaccine skepticism

In 2009, Carrey wrote an article questioning the merits of vaccination for The Huffington Post.[149] With former partner Jenny McCarthy, Carrey led a "Green Our Vaccines" march in Washington, D.C., to advocate for the removal of "toxic substances" from children's vaccines, out of a belief that children had received "too many vaccines, too soon, many of which are toxic".[150] The rally was criticized by David Gorski, an American surgical oncologist on Science-Based Medicine blog, for being anti-vaccine and not "pro-safe vaccine",[151] and by Steven Parker on the WebMD website for being "irresponsible".[152]

On July 1, 2015, after the signing of a new vaccination law, Carrey called California Governor Jerry Brown a "corporate fascist" who was "poisoning" children by enacting the vaccination requirements.[153] The law disallowed religious and philosophical reasons for exemption from vaccination. Carrey was criticized for being "ignorant when it comes to vaccines" by Arthur Caplan, head of the Division of Medical Ethics at New York University,[154] and by Jeffrey Kluger, senior writer at Time, who described his anti-vaccination statements as "angry, dense and immune to reason".[155]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Carrey

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I like him enough as an actor to forgive the indiscretion if he had a change of heart. It seems there's nothing past 2015, and I feel like he must have changed his opinion if he was silent about it during COVID.

Maybe it's just wishful thinking, I haven't looked past the wiki.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

nothing on jenny past 2015, its like news about them disappeared after that, maybe they are keeping thier anti-vax more private.

https://youtu.be/8r3RQD8rE9E

He's openly said that he isn't Jim Carrey, Jim Carrey is his Batman to his Bruce Wayne.

"I'm not real." -Jim Carrey.

Gah what a fucking tool.

Well at least he isn’t getting paid when I rewatch Ace Ventura 2 on plex 😎

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, yes. Check out the Wikipedia article. It's a roller coaster ride.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably from his time being married to jenny McCarthy

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like Jim at all, he's a brain damaged hypocrite who thinks he's the wisest motherfucker to ever live.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think you may be reading him wrong. He keeps saying he isn't him or anyone else. I think he thinks that he is just a guy, and Jim Carrey is his Batman. I kinda feel bad for the guy, as it seems that he has to keep feeding the machine so he can pay for whatever debts he's trying to take care of.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"He keeps saying he isn't him or anyone else."

The guy doesn't want to take responsibility for the terrible things he's done like driving Cathriona White to suicide or him being a massive hypocrite when he took action movie money then claimed that anyone who sees the movie is endorsing irl violence.

He's just another washed comedian from the 90's who thinks his immense privilege is somehow profound.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of people are upset that you're poo-pooing on their childhood celebrity nostalgia. We're gonna ask you to poo poo on somebody else's nostalgia.

Maybe something less charged like a celebrity from the Apprentice or Oprah?

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

My toxic trait is hating on sanctimonious celebrities who got famous before the internet era

Really gets the gen x's stirred up

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, rewatching the documentary that Patrick CC made on him does highlight that a bit more than I remembered.

Though it does go on to say that none of that evidence held up in court upon examination. I'm not going to say that totally clears Carrey, it doesn't. It does seem he crashed hard, possibly intentionally on others parts, and has willingly stepped out of the spotlight since. He seems to have learned something.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

That sounds kinda brain damaged to me