this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
290 points (98.7% liked)

News

23266 readers
4906 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
290
Southern Baptists expel Virginia church for believing women can serve as pastors (apnews.com)
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Even as they prepare to vote on a formal ban on churches with women pastors, delegates to the Southern Baptist Convention annual meeting voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to boot one such church from its ranks.

Messengers, as voting representatives are known, voted 6,759 to 563 to oust First Baptist Church of Alexandria, a historic Virginia congregation that affirms women can serve in any pastoral role, including as senior pastor. A similar scenario played out at last year’s meeting. Two congregations, including a well-known California megachurch, were ejected from the convention. Ninety-two percent of messengers approved this year’s ouster. 

The Virginia congregation has been involved in the nation’s largest Protestant denomination since its 19th century founding and has contributed millions toward denominational causes. But it came under scrutiny after the pastor of a neighboring church reported it to denominational authorities over its having a woman as pastor for children and women.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 92 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

-1 Timothy 2:12

This is why I hate the "these aren't real Christians" no-true-Scotsman dismissals.

The Bible is a toxic book full of misogyny and racism. Sure it has some good stuff in there, but when the founder of Christianity* is so clear about his thoughts on the subjugation of women then these are Christians following the teachings of their religion.

Christianity is only compatible with the modern world when it is so diluted by humanism that it would be unrecognizable by its founder; that's why reactionaries are working to change the world instead of updating their morality. They want power over people, and enforcing their backwards ideology is their path forward.

* And Paul was the founder of the religion; Jesus didn't expect the world to last longer than the lives of his disciples

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm gonna quote Wikipedia on 1 Timothy:

Nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship questioned the authenticity of the letter, with many scholars suggesting that First Timothy, along with Second Timothy and Titus, are not the work of Paul, but of an unidentified Christian writing some time in the late-first to mid-second centuries.[5]. Most scholars now affirm this view.[6][7]

It turns out that most of the NT passages that have been used to repress women use grammar and vocab that suggest they did not actually come from Paul. And in fact they are a hundred years newer than the letters that do appear to be authentically from "Paul".

And Paul was the founder of the religion; Jesus didn't expect the world to last longer than the lives of his disciples

Paul expected the world to end too. That's why he suggested that everyone should be celibate. No point in getting married and having children if the world is just going to end anyway.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

That is a great point about pseudopaul. I had forgotten that this letter's authenticity was questionable.

However there are practically no evangelical groups who would agree with modern scholarship on the subject, so my larger point holds: they believe that Paul instructed women to be subservient and silent.

Also, as far as I can tell, Paul was one of the ones who shifted Jesus' prophecy about his coming kingdom from that of an imminent apocalypse to a prediction about the rise of the Christian church. While he did believe that the end of the world was near, so do a huge swath of Christians today.

Thanks for the correction, it is appreciated.

[–] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure about the value of questioning the authenticity of something that has been canon for almost 2000 years. It's like quibbling about how the Latin translation of the Old Testament doesn't match Hebrew sources.

Who cares which misogynistic jerk wrote that passage? It's been part of the bedrock of the faith of countless generations of misogynists since then.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy

Besides, that isn't even an appeal to tradition, because they aren't arguing that something is correct because it is traditional, but rather specifying that the tradition is de facto practiced and accepted.

[–] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're getting at.

All I'm saying is that, for Christians, the text of the Bible has been mostly locked down since the Vulgate Bible at around 400 AD. The content is what it is, and is the basis of the faith.

At this point it doesn't matter if someone mistranslated the Hebrew, misquoted Jesus, made Jesus up entirely, or forged an epistle. It's been in there for 1600 years and it's authenticity or accuracy is moot.

Arguing about the origin of 1 Timothy is like arguing about the colour of the wings on the fairies that live at the bottom of the garden. It's all made up rubbish anyways.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm just an ex-Mormon agnostic atheist, and you're absolutely right, and trying to say that the hardliners are not "Christian" is overlooking a well-established tradition of Christianity being shitty. They are perfectly within "scriptural authority" as they understand it and as their ancestors have understood it.

On the other, there is room in the historical record and scholarship of the Bible as historical text to make a case for an evolving faith that can forge a kinder path, and I think many of the remaining protestants in Europe and "mainline" Chritian churches in America try to to this to one degree or another. Unfortunately, they are all much too content either to humor the fundies, maybe because many in their own congregations would pick that theology if forced to choose explicitly, or else they "No True Scotsman" the hard liners and count themselves done with it.

If you are a Christian who believes that your God is kinder than he is described, then assert that confidently. Make a place in the world. Assert that your Bible is a flawed documentation of an evolving faith tradition. If you can't do that, and most of them can't because they fear the Southern Baptist Convention might be right, then you have to live with being conflated with those who think Iron-Age nonsense and cruelty should be the basis for a modern society.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And the United Methodist Church just recently became dis-united, allowing its various divisions to make their own decisions on things like gay marriage. What's going on with the protestants?

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

Their numbers are declining, but it's leaving primarily those who are most psychotically zealous in their commitment to fundamentalism and Christian Dominionism. Those few who don't toe the line completely are either finding themselves pushed out of their communities, or their communities are having to make adaptations to allow mutually-incompatible views of theology to coexist, to at least temporarily.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

gotta hand it to the baptists.. they have severe conviction for their form of crazy

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Worth mentioning that Southern Baptists and American Baptists are about as similar as Grape Jelly and KY Jelly.

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Until you mention holding a sock hop at the local bowling alley.

[–] card797@champserver.net 4 points 4 months ago

I think they really do hop and not dance.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Alexandria church is currently led by a man, Robert Stephens, but the church has made clear it believes women can serve as senior pastors...

I couldn't help but laugh at the absurdity of this. The church they kicked out doesn't have a woman pastor and doesn't have plans to have a woman pastor. They just said "we think women could be pastors" and that was enough. Jesus Christ, these people.

[–] Feliskatos@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Christians often claim persecution. They persecuted themselves?

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Has it been 30 years already since The Vicar of Dibley aired, after this issue was resolved in the church of england

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Great show

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Yeah, only old men can diddle little boys!

[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not really necessary to be part of the Southern Baptist convention. In fact, it's not really necessary to be part of any church at all. A person doesn't have to go to church. There's no requirement for it and they can live a perfectly moral and meaningful life without ever setting foot in a church.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

they can live a perfectly moral and meaningful life without ever setting foot in a church.

Or believing in god at all.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Tangent, but I've been going down an Alex O'Connor and Esoterica rabbit hole on YouTube, and there are some very interesting things about the historical development of religion and the Judaeo-Christian Bible on those channels that really opened my eyes to how shoddy my education was on these topics. Modern scholarship has come a long way.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Should ask the Pope if he'd be willing to excommunicate them while you're at it.

[–] pleb_maximus@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are Protestants. They already are as far as the Pope is concerned (IIRC).

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, that was the point of me saying they "should", it would be equally pointless. I doubt that congregation or any others are going to be positively swayed by this decision.