this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
94 points (92.0% liked)

News

23275 readers
3433 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

...

Compared to other countries, America is known for bigger cars, portions and take-out coffee cup sizes. For most of recent history, Americans have also wanted bigger homes — but now that’s changing.

For most of the last half-century, new single-family homes kept growing. In 1973, the median size of completed single-family homes was 1,525 square feet, according to US Census data. By 2015, that number had ballooned to 2,467 square feet.

But as the cost of buying a home has exploded and McMansions have fallen out of favor, homebuilders have reversed course, building smaller homes with an eye to first-time buyers. In 2023, the median single-family home built was 2,233 square feet, down 9% from the 2015 peak, with many formal dining rooms and “bonus” rooms disappearing.

Carias and her partner ultimately settled on a roughly 920-square-foot home. To maximize space, they decided to use the basement as their primary bedroom.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 99 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This just means you'll pay the same price for a smaller house.

Source: am australian

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"why sell 1 regular house on an acre when you can sell 10 tiny houses on the same acre?"

real estate investor

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If they did that, they just might alleviate the massive supply shortage we ran into. That would actually be great.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They are doing that. It's really common to see a single family home with a decent but not big lot become 8 townhouses with no lot in big cities. Each townhouse costs roughly what the SFH cost the developers to buy.

Its more housing, but not at a pace that is fixing the issue, and you can argue the home buyers are getting way less out of it than they used to.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Building like that on those lots is often against zoning code. About 3/4 of all residential lots in the US are zoned for single family homes only, and though this is changing, you're correct that it's not fast enough. I'd be happy to get less than what my parents bought, when I'm ready to buy. As empty nesters now, they've easily got 4 times as much house as they actually need or use, and my mom in particular refuses to move. Friends of mine bought a place at the market rock bottom back in about 2012, and with no kids themselves, they also have far too much house, but that's what was available.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

These are in a major metropolitan area in the US and are fully legal where they are built.

They are modern, and in the case of new builds even include warranties for the first couple of years, but otherwise are pretty ass backwards on the "$/sqft" scale.

Its still denser housing in a place that needs it badly, but the price gouging is irritating to see.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I didn't mean to imply that denser housing was being built illegally, only that the availability of it is a product of zoning codes forbidding it in most places. I don't expect dollars per square foot to scale linearly in either case, and in my personal experience, when I ran the numbers about 7 years ago, moving from suburbia to a dense city ended up costing me almost exactly the same, because I no longer need a car here. You think differently about how much space you actually need when your social space is no longer a back yard or a living room and is instead a park or a nearby bar or something.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

At least they're getting better walkability out of the deal, and the local government won't go bankrupt trying to maintain infrastructure serving them like the ones full of 1-acre lots will.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If they did that, they just might alleviate the massive supply shortage we ran into. That would actually be great.

Here's a rare example from San Antonio TX. These are small 600 sq ft homes, each with their won driveway, backyard, front yard with no shared walls with your neighbor. Priced at $135k.

If I were renting a one or two bedroom apartment, I'd much rather buy one of these instead.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's awesome. I live in an apartment that's only a smidge more than 600 sqft, so that's a good size for one person or a couple.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Yes, but they need to spread propaganda that the top 10% are not bleeding the rest if us dry.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It takes less resources and money to keep a smaller house. Smaller repair bills, smaller utility bills and smaller amounts of maintenance. Smaller, more sustainable housing should require people to work less to afford to live.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago

Or it means, people get in way more debt than they can afford to buy a small low quality house, that costs more than a comparable apartment and doesn't offer any of the benefits of a proper house.

We have those developments here in Germany and it's awful. It looks like shit and I'm 80% sure that a significant part of the current owners could only afford their houses due to the low interest rates of the last decade. If they have to inevitably refinance, someone loses their job or a large unexpected expense happens, they're absolutely fucked.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Welcome to German suburbs. Where the space between houses is the absolute minimum, the houses are only slightly larger than a reasonable apartment and every house looks exactly the same like in the 20 other new development areas around the city.

It's the plastic version of the discount dream of wealth.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Hey CNN, you dropped the most important value there buddy. I see median new construction is still 200k+ more than I can afford so....

WHAT'S THE PRICE!?

I don't for one single millisecond believe that these "starter houses" will come with starter prices. You know, the whole goddamn reason we can't buy anything...

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They didn't drop it. You didn't read the article.

There are signs those efforts might be helping buyers get in the door: The median sales price of existing homes jumped to $426,900 in June, according to the National Association of Realtors, while the median price of new homes in June was $417,300, according to the US Census Bureau.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Okay I thought my guess was already ridiculous but what in the actual fuck?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I did read and it's in my comment (in the form of "it's 200k+ more than I can afford" referring to their median quote). They specifically say the median price of new homes, they didn't specify these "starter homes" that the article is supposed to be about.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Young people are getting fucked by previous generations, and will have to make do with less. It's pretty great for rich people, though!"

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

But have you tried being born wealthy?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They’re only 386k(!)

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

For most of recent history, Americans have also wanted bigger homes — but now that’s changing.

For most of recent history, there were no other options. We codified a lot of this into regulations.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Shrinkflation has reached the real estate market.

[–] jprice@kbin.run 14 points 3 months ago

Pay MORE for LESS! It’s the American idiot way!

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Oh yes, now I can definitely live in a 10 sqms apartment, yey

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

On a related subject, this video goes pretty deep into real estate development and why American garages are shrinking.

https://youtu.be/b8wnnFUazOY?si=Hyr70ei-ggllXdn3

[–] Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kind of okay with this. I don't really want to manage/clean a huge place. 2 bed, 1 bath, 1 car garage , and a little back yard is perfect for me as a single person. If it was priced reasonably, I would jump at it- but where I live they'd charge close to a mil and everything would start to fall apart in a year or two because of cut corners 😞

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

I have that, minus the yard, in my apartment. I pay $1,400/month in Austin, TX.

[–] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

We just had our first and live in a two bed that’s “1500” sq feet I could not imaging a family of 4 or 5 living in smaller especially if 1 or both spouses work from home. I need a room to close the door at the end of the day to not look at work anymore

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also, a smaller home makes adding an ADU to rent out easier on a standard lot. At least in high COL areas.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the lots are getting subdivided.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah, that works too.

Someone bought a home over my way and added a 2-story ADU in their backyard. They rent both units out. Probably pays for the mortgage completely.

I laugh when I pass that one. No idea how they got a 2-story permit for an ADU that is taller than it is wide in a 1-story neighborhood.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

depends on local restrictions. in california i'm limited to 25 feet or as tall as the main house, whichever is lower.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/08/05/business/home-sizes-shrinking/index.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support