this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
251 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

For monopolistic behavior, right?

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 112 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wonder if this is just the website not being able to cut the number in half, or whether they did this on purpose

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like its on purpose but i also feel like web designers are often incompetent with stuff like that. So im undecided.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

Maybe the boss said, "Remove wordwrap in headline text for this post."

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be fair the browser default for stuff like this is often kind of bad. Like browsers would rather give you a scroll bar than do a word break (and I can pretty much guarantee that's what's happened here as I can scroll right and see the full number).

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The Register kind-of models itself after a tabloid style so has deliberately jokey headlines. It's been around a long time (I read it in the 90s) and seems to have quality underneath the humor.

Possibly the only remaining place where you can read the word "boffins" regularly.

[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 10 points 1 week ago

I think it’s a CSS issue. Word wrapping won’t break apart the amount because it’s considered one “word.”

There are ways to address it though.

Source: I’m a full stack web application developer

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 4 points 1 week ago

Or do. It's not like people care if he breathes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the fact that Google didn't pay them more money than exists in the world will be why Russia blocks Google's operations in the country and seizes every bit of property they can get their hands on that they say was even vaguely related to Google's operations. They didn't even bother with a realistic number, because in the end they don't really care who does or doesn't believe them.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

They didn't start with that fine, it was just compounding interest

The court imposed a fine of 100 thousand rubles ($1,025) per day, with the total fine doubling every week.

And regardless, Russia can't block Google's operations in Russia because Google isn't operating in Russia since the war. Russia is trying to fire Google when Google quit 2 years ago.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to my Google Currency Calculator app, that translates to approximately $14.38 USD.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Best I can do is tree-fiddy

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they could just go for googol dollars

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

They're doubling it every week, so a googol is only ~4 years off.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago

Totally not a joke-country you guys.
Totally normal.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago

Meh. This is but a fraction of what the big media companies think the world owes them for piracy.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To everyone saying "this isn't possible for Google to pay" really need to take a step back and realize that there's always a way.

Given the amount of money we're talking, it would only take a tiny fraction of that money for Google to deliver a series of small asteroids directly to Russia. Depending on the asteroid, and the conversion rates, Russia might consider the debt paid after a single delivery.

[–] TseseJuer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

asteroid in leui of cash

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

What’s that number in words? Sure. I could use Google, but they just got fined by Russia for $20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 so can they really be trusted?

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

20 Decillion

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

2 x 10^34 for those people who like to use numbers to represent numbers in a sane way.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

What’s that number in words?

Per the article, it's 20 decillion.

[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Being fined by Russia is actually a positive stamp of approval in my book!

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

Maybe they meant rubles. I think I may find that value in my couch.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's an actual court doing this.. Lol.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

So, they do control whatever assets Google had within Russia - article said a closed up office, and 200 remaining employees laid off, to get them entirely out of the country

If they do attempt to look for more assets to seize, they’ll pretty quickly run up against any other country saying “were their sanctions at the time?”

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Well, a russian one. So not really but ehhhh

[–] finkrat@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I was going to say Russia must love humiliating themselves but I guess this is painfully obvious the past 2 years

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

All made up, just like the reason for invading Ukraine

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, it was that easy all the time to fix a country's economy? Why did no one think of that before?

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They know this is impossible - even with their worthless currency. I guess they will soon provide their own services or they will revoke internet access from their citizens.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is not only more Rubles than currently exists, but more money than currently exists in any currency 😂

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

According to the Article:

Google in Russia has been inactive since 2022 after the search giant effectively pulled out of the country following Putin's special military operation.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I guess they will soon provide their own services

Is Yandex not state run? It does everything, the way Musk wants Xitter to, and then some.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What you don't need Google to access internet

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, but users with basic knowledge don't even get the difference between a web browser and a search engine. Shutting down Google seems like a perfect "simple" explanation for a general digital lockdown.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're describing users without basic knowledge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Google would therefore have to find more money than exists on Earth to pay Moscow

Well to be fair, I do think it's plausible that one day Google will indeed control all the money in the world.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why does the article keep referring to Google as "The Chocolate Factory?"

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The Register has been referring to Google as The Chocolate Factory for almost 10 years. As to why, probably because of google’s confectionary named Android releases, which they stopped at Android 10

https://xiaomiui.net/sweet-names-of-android-you-may-want-to-eat-it-18036/

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe because their company produces pure shit?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

just tell them it's in the mail, google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 667@lemmy.radio 6 points 1 week ago
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

RT broke a bunch of YouTube rules and should have been banned too.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And they only stopped writing zeros only because there was no more space on their paper form.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

April 1st came early

load more comments
view more: next ›