this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
282 points (98.3% liked)

politics

22642 readers
5671 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Republicans face rising fears of a 2026 midterms backlash after defeats in key races, with some blaming Trump’s tariffs and Elon Musk’s influence.

Trump announced sweeping new trade levies Wednesday, alarming GOP strategists who warn of higher prices and economic risks.

Vulnerable Republicans urge a return to economic messaging, citing concerns the party is overreaching. Democrats are leveraging Musk’s unpopularity, linking him to GOP policies.

The GOP remains divided over how to respond.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

Well, you greedy fucks thought you could control a "celebrity," and push your Neo Feudalist agenda.

You didn't count on him being the most psycho narcissist you'd ever met, did you?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

Well, it's not like the Democrats are going to take advantage of it or anything. They probably shouldn't worry about that, maybe they should worry more about being hauled out of their beds and dragged through the streets naked. That's a lot more likely.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

They should be worried, everything is stacking up to be a classic mid-term bloodbath, just like 2010.

And that is exactly why there will either be a heavily and obviously rigged election, or HitlerPig will impose Martial Law over some False Flag operation (probably ferocious violence against peaceful protesters), and suspend all elections until peace is restored, which will never happen because he controls the peace.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

If they actually cared they do have the power to stop Trump.

Don't worry though, if people are even allowed to vote in 2016 Republican voters wil have long forgotten by then what it was like to have rights and be able to afford groceries, and will be happy to vote to let the leopards eat the faces of the next outgroup in line.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They should be concerned about being hung for treason if they keep supporting a coup.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Point to a second Republican that has actually been punished for their criminal misconduct.

Is Matt Gaetz in jail yet? Did Dick Cheney spend any time behind bars? What about Richard Nixon?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes

There's plenty of them. 13 during GW Bush's administration alone (and 3 Democrats)

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think the justice system will do anything.

[–] dota__2@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this is all song and dance. trust nothing that is said that remotely sounds good for their opposition.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly.

I remember Mitch saying that the reason he voted against the second impeachment was that he felt Trump's Jan 6 crimes would be better adjucated in criminal court. And before that, I remember Linsday saying that if Trump wins the GOP nomination in 2016, the GOP will get "destroyed.... and we'll deserve it".

Never underestimate the ability of Republican voters to enthusiastically vote against their interests....

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago

Trump's Jan 6 crimes would be better adjucated in criminal court

As soon as he said that, I knew they'd never hold him accountable. Because I knew they'd immediately move to "Congress didn't convict him so there's nothing to see here", "if we have to go to court, let's bring in every stalling tactic possible" followed by "why are you investigating such an old event". I hate the Republicans.

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I don't buy anything about how the public is leaning anymore. I assume everyone is conservative and will continue to vote conservative in every election until I see any evidence otherwise.

After the 2024 election, the public can't be trusted and the media absolutely cannot be, in regards to elections especially.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should be more worried about trump making being a congressman or judge a powerless position. There are so many executive actions going against law and it keeps increasing.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Illegal Executive Orders are still illegal, and obeying them is illegal.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I believed that, they'd stop doing stupid shit.

Since they aren't, I don't believe they are worried in thetvemidhdjdm

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Never seen someone give up on the last sentence they were writing like that

[–] Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think he just stroked out

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually I was dosing off. I had thought I wrote "in the slightest" but I remember it being real blurry before I hit enter.

I'm leaving it because I'm laughing my ass off about how it turned out

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Drink a covfefe.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Been there, my friend!

I do all the time on phone keyboards

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 43 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I've been hoping for a MAGoo/GOP war since 2015.

otoh, if DOGE really manages to mess up Social Security payments, there's no way the GOP can recover.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

otoh, if DOGE really manages to mess up Social Security payments, there’s no way the GOP can recover.

Republicans straight up nuked the economy in 2008 and they were back in the Congressional Majority two years later. Same thing happened in 2020.

Gerrymandering makes many of these maps mathematically unwinnable for Democrats

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im not so sure it'd be that easy. The conservative media cesspool is closed loop. They will lie and blame the Dems for not making it break proof or some other BS and the sheep will eat it up.

We will need Dems to go onto the shows and blast the message day and night that it's broken bc GOP allowed I lt it be broken by an illegal imagrant.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago

Our hope now is in the leopards

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't go that far. The maga Republicans are obviously so easily manipulated without a shred of critical thought left that they will do whatever their overlords want of them.

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they're willing to brazenly attack Social Security, maybe they don't care about elections anymore.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

That's the issue. If they really start screwing with SS payments, it means that they are confident that they have control of future elections. Then the only question will be if they do it softly, and rig the elections and claim they are 100% fair and square (which the Dems will support, like 2020), or if they decide to go full on Nazi, and cancel elections altogether, then enthusiastically and ruthlessly murder anyone who dares to question it.

Looking at the players, like Pukin, Skum, Kapo Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller, Steve "Unwiped Asshole" Bannon, et al, my bet is that they'll go for the full on Nazi dictatorship. They aren't building a 30K capacity concentration camp in Guantanamo for giggles.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get what you’re saying, but I am also extremely aware of how fucking stupid the American electorate is, up to and including having all government support taken away and responding with “thank you sir, may I have another”. American conservatives are deeply stupid.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Didn't forget the Democrats strong suit is striking out at tee ball. It should be easy to capitalize on this, but I just know they'll totally fuck it up.

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And on purpose. They aren’t a leftist party.

Oh yeah, absolutely.

Also, I’m totally stealing “striking out at tee ball” lmao

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Snatching Defeat from the jaws of Victory is the Democratic brand. See 2000, 2004, 2016, 2020.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

People used to say Reagan and his courting of the 'moral majority' were going to fracture the party and cause it to destroy itself with the embrace of a massively divisive religious rhetoric. It's wishful thinking at best.

there’s no way the GOP can recover.

I want this to be true, but it just isn't. A third of the country will follow along with whatever mental gymnastics are required to blame democrats. Another third are just not paying enough attention and vote on pure vibes, if at all. If dems try to run an unlikable, centrist candidate with a mixed at best record it will end up a toss up. And the electorate at large will forget everything that is happening now within eight years.

[–] ofcourse@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Until Republican lawmakers change their voting patterns, these articles mean nothing and IMO are poor journalism. Lawmakers can say anything about their reelection worries and polls almost always show swings in the opposite direction after elections.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fucking traitors should be nervous about much more than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gargolito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Sure,like they haven't compromised every single board of elections to never lose an election.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

What are they afraid of? Trump has fucked the trans gendered, illegal aliens, brown Americans and residents, old Americans, poor Americans and now he really taking it to the penguins of uninhabited islands. Thats what I call winning baby!

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

3 months in and they are worried about 2y down the road. Oof

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You say 2 years, but the election is 19 months away and early campaigns will start in 8. Shit, we'll probably see the first early messaging by the end of summer. So it's no stretch to believe that some candidates for target races are being vetted already. And that means anger now makes a difference.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Campaign ads have already started for the Senate race in my state.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll celebrate once it comes to past.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll celebrate (1) once it's come to pass, (b) the Democrats have actually started standing up to ... well, anybody, (c) the resistance has started to have irrevocable wins, and (d) all the people and institutions that have actively enabled this situation are gone.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

The Dems have to start by standing up to the Quislings in their own party, like Chuck Schumer.

Booker's speech was an obvious audition for Schumer's seat, so let's have the vote, get Schumer out of his leadership position, and then force him out of office in the same humiliating fashion as when he stabbed Al Franken in the back. Then AOC can take Schumer's seat, and we can go to war with the MAGA Nazis.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Piece of cake. Just make it a illegal to vote for anyone but Republicans.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm reading that in a positive light: abolish political parties (i.e. no more magic 'R' for the mouth-breathers to look for).

Everyone (sane, insane, benevolent, evil, corrupt, etc) runs as Republican. Nice little loophole.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mad bastard, that's twisted genius!

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 1 day ago

Turnabout's fair play 🤷‍♂️ My state-level politicians have been running as Democrats and then switching parties after they're elected. 😠

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

No they aren’t. They have cheated and gerrymandered their way into tenured positions, the only way out is them dying or retiring.

load more comments
view more: next ›