this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
953 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

14948 readers
699 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

How else are you going to have a 1-sided sheet?

Hmm. Would the surface of a sphere qualify as a sheet? But I feel that is cheating. The inside would count as another side if you could only get to it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, defining the cheat sheet limitation in such a way for Math students is really just asking for it ...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If the parameter is that it’s 1 sided then you don’t need to be this creative, just have a longer sheet

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Inefficient though

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, but that would make them have two sides, one (or both) with writing on it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 23 hours ago

drapes the entire class in his giant sheet of note paper

[–] kehet@sopuli.xyz 279 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I would allow it, it's brilliant. The main learning benefit of cheat sheets comes from writing them, not from using them.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 90 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This. Most classes in uni allowed us to have a limited number of cheat sheets and after writing them I rarely used them. Open book exams are a different beast though.

[–] Brosplosion@lemm.ee 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of my math professors would always ask if people wanted an open book take home exam or an in person exam. Those who had taken his classes before knew to never vote for the take home open book, but were always outweighed by the new folks. Hardest exams I took in college by a large margin

[–] vala@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds kinda adversarial from the teachers perspective.

[–] Brosplosion@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ehh moreso that the expectations of the student with all possible resources available are much higher than an in person exam from rote. Some proofs on the in person exam would be trivial as they were similar to ones in the textbook. Take home proofs could go several pages and require you to extrapolate from what was learned so far.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I understand the "lesson" he's teaching them and also understand that open book tests should be harder.

Point is that he's tricking them. Or letting them trick themselves. That's not what a friend or trusted adult would do. That's what an adversary would do.

He has power over these kids in a big way and should be honest and up front about the reality of the situation.

[–] scytale@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

I take certification exams that are open book. I still create an index aka cheat sheet because typing it out makes me internalize what I’m reading. It’s also easier to refer to an index of a couple of pages vs several books in a time-bound exam.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

As someone who spent a few years teaching math, this would be a cause for celebration! I would have had a classroom pizza party the next day. This is creative usage of problem solving math that I could only dream about a classroom of students could come up with.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Depends on the class.

I had a statistics course that allowed us one single sided page, but as long as your printer could handle infinitely small print, she didn’t care if you had magnification. You could hypothetically have keychain bible print for your entire book as a cheat sheet, it just wouldn’t help you in the allotted time.

My cheat sheet for R was nothing but codes because I’m not a coder at all (R and basic Linux are my entire coding experience, and it was fucking miserable) and that helped if I remembered to label the fucking codes. And LOL nope.

But I cheated in other classes by doing such nonsense as writing vocab on my shoes… in college language courses, which I paid for myself.. so dumb and counter productive.

I was never smart enough to cheat in regular school.. I just brute forced the work.. ironyyyyyyyyy

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

A great teacher would surreptitiously plant the idea to do this.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even be mad. As long as they could explain what a Mobius Strip is, they can use it.

[–] Ravi@feddit.org 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heard of someone writing in multiple colours and using tinted transparent plastic sheets to read it.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 117 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First mistake was to not specify a sheet size

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

OK, based on the comments, it's AI.

This one isn't. A sheet of paper from mythbusters.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 48 points 1 day ago

it's AI

Looks a lot larger than A1 tbh

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Telltales: floor too shiny, machines on the sides dont make sense, inconsistencies in piping in the ceiling, random floating bits on the top right, a few big shadows that dont match the windows instead of many smaller ones

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The spacing on the lights up top is super weird. AI seems to have a real problem recreating consistent repeated patterns.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (16 children)

This image… I don’t know if it is AI or it isn’t… but it certainly feels like AI…

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's how they make paper and a lot of other flat goods like tape. The manufacturer makes these gigantic rolls then there's this entire industry called converting where a company, a converter, takes it and process it down into a finished product. They may add adhesives, lamination or printing to it during the process.

You can go to a store and buy 3M tape but 3M doesn't actually make it like that. They make a 12ft wide, 10,000 ft roll that someone buys and forklifts into a machine that cuts it into a bunch of smaller rolls that you can buy

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Those machines are referred to as slitters. I designed and built 2 for 3M Abrasive division back in the 1990's. Talk about a process that involves less than reliable hardware, (I never met an air bar or pneumatic web sensor I didn't hate), and enough wishful thinking to achieve the speeds 3M wanted them to run at that would make an Alchemist proud. I was constantly amazed that my designs even worked at all.

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Adobe stock photos link says its generated.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Holy shit. Ok I'm gonna make an ai to feed generated prompts into a generative AI, let it run for a week and sell the mountain of slop as stock photos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

[2] is ai generated or so it says. [4] is real but not as big, and not quite a ton, it says '307kg'.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Lauchmelder@feddit.org 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should have specified that the paper must also be orientable

[–] WhyIAughta@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that might be racist.

[–] blx@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At the very least spaciesist.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Definitively dimensionist.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 day ago
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'm no math teacher but I'd call that worth extra credit!

[–] ramius345@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

Something something sheets are planar, but then also allow it because it's great.

[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Id only allow it if it was a seamless piece of paper (not taped together) lol

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i don't think that's fair because such papers don't exist

[–] lambda@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Glue and lots of patience and skill and it can.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so tape isn't allowed but glue is?

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Just weld the paper. Problem solved.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

Should get bonus points.

load more comments
view more: next ›