this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
275 points (91.5% liked)

News

32729 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Ought to be in Not the Onion.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought they were literally made out of money these days, considering the prices last few years.

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't eat a ton of chips, but with the prices, I haven't bought any name brand chips in over two years.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

I haven't bought store brand because I haven't found good ones, but I've bought Euro brands over lays or cheetos. Best price to quality ratio is actually local brands, they even beat out other European brands.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No way, I don't believe it. They are absolutely at least 60% cardboard.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They, you mean the consumers, right?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

you do need those fibers. and meat is made from gym mats and couch stuffing.

[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

and 20 percent air

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just when I think we've scrapped the bottom of human stupidity...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well the title isn’t exactly accurate. It references a 2021 study to get the title but Pepsi said nothing about it

The changes come as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pushes companies to ditch artificial ingredients.

This is likely the bigger factor.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I also have my issues with the cited "study."

I'm not saying Americans aren't dumb, but I take this kind of data with a sack of salt. How was the study phrased? What does the company stand to gain by expressing the results of the study in this way? Why not tell us exactly how the study was performed and what questions were on it?

There's a big difference between "Hey, what are Lay's chips made of?" and "Do you know what exact ingredients are in your bag of chips?"

My gut tells me this is all fairly performative framing so they can just cozy up to a political administration for favor and head-pets while also trying a new marketing campaign that should be universally acceptable to consumers, one that reframes their products as "healthy" in some way.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Whoopee. Pepsi gets keeled by a fucking political scion with worms for brains.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All I know is that I'm not paying $5 a bag for their stale chips.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Must be a US thing, in the UK they are easily one of if not the most popular brand of crisps (chips) they are called walkers here but the logo is the same. We have stricter regulations on what is classed as food in this country though.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Pepsico basically said on an investor call they will keep jacking up the price so long as people keep buying .

So here we are I guess.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is it just me or does it not literally say “potato chips” right on the bag? Been a long while since I had any Lay’s brand chips.

E: yes it does, on the bigger bags it’s on the front. Not sure about the smaller bags.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

da fuq did people think they are?! 🤨

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guessing the question wasn't clear, since Lays is both the name of the original product (potato chips) and the brand (which without looking it up I would guess includes other types of chips such as corn). But results from a well-formulated survey would have less clickbait value, so the shock results get reported.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Frito lay produces non potatoe chips but I don't think any under the lays brand are corn etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lines up with the mouth breathing Trump voter stats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just don't understand how it is that chips and things like Doritos can possibly cost so much. It must be due to more and more consolidation and price-fixing.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's due to people still buying them after every price increase.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

So like with EVERYTHING else that is crazy expensive. Basic supply and demand... Yet people are baffled

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Reminds me about the fact that a roughly equal proportion of the population does not know that peanuts, just like potatoes, grow underground.

Peanuts freshly harvested from the soil

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok. But I would say not knowing potato chips are made of potato is slightly worse.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I wonder what people guess what french fries are made from...

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

42% also think Trump is something other than a grifting piece of shit.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (9 children)

That's a little more understandable. Peas grow on vines, so you'd expect peanuts to be somehow similar to peas. I guess they get their name because they're in pods like peas but without being told, how would someone guess they grow underground?

And cashews do grow on trees (they're technically a fruit) and are similar to peanuts. Would anyone guess that cashews are fruits?

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

They're legumes that grow underground and trigger nut allergies. They are the platypus of the plant world.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know why I remember this, but there was also a Spongebob episode that showed a potted peanut plant with peanuts growing on it like peas do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

TIL I thought they were like beans hanging in the air.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I just had raw peanuts for the first time this week and the taste was intriguing. It really brings home how they are "legumes" when they taste more like peas than peanut butter.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 115 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would be more inclined to blame stupid consumers on this one.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The rebrand isn't because of stupidity it's because money. Like always.

Big picture: Lay’s generates about 60% of PepsiCo’s annual sales but has seen sales slip every quarter for the last three years. Consumers in every income bracket have been ditching classic snack brands amid rising prices.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (8 children)

So it's not that the consumer is stupid, it's that marketing is desperate to find another way to explain that no one can afford $8 for a bag of shitty chips?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article seems much closer to a PepsiCo marketing piece than proper journalism.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (5 children)

How can people be that dumb. It is literally in the name: Potato Chips.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait, which study was this? The page says it was from 2021. What was the question? What was the context? Who were polled and how? I am dubious.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›