this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
280 points (98.6% liked)

politics

27541 readers
3478 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the president wears bandages on the back of his hand because he's “literally constantly shaking hands.”

CNN host Jake Tapper isn’t buying the official White House explanation for Donald Trump sporting bandages on the back of his hand, arguing on “The Lead” that there’s more to the president’s health picture than has been revealed.

Tapper discussed the matter with CNN chief political analyst David Axelrod and ex-Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday that Trump wears the bandages as a result of “constantly shaking hands.”

“The White House gave the same explanation for bruising back in July,” Tapper said Thursday. “Obviously, he’s 79 years old. And there is something going on with his health that they’re not telling us, because otherwise, why did he have that MRI?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucky_Acid@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why say something now, Jake? Why not wait until after his presidency? Then write a book about it? Then sell that book while you're doing your job on TV? Just a thought.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I’m $ure he ha$ hi$ rea$ons.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Because he's holding out for a spot when Trump dies. Everyone in the conservative sphere is circling the White House like sharks because they know half of everyone is gone as soon as Vance sits down - because half of them are in those seats on account of being friends with Trump and nothing more.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bruised hand you say? JD is slacking on his primary duty

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 28 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm so tired of this fucking story. This evil p.o.s is never going to die. We've been hearing Trump health/mind failing stories for like 10 fucking years already...

Wake me up when he's actually dead. Unfortunately he's probably going to outlive me and I'm only 39.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

His age makes people complacent because they assume he's gonna die soon. Even if he does, I'm not sure it'll improve anything

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly.

Unless his death is imminent, I dont care.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If he's been having micro-strokes, the likelihood of a massive game-ending stroke is much higher than in the general population. Though it would be more just if he had one that rendered him crippled, incapable of speech, and in constant pain, then he lived another decade after being removed from office, having enough awareness to know that his ill-gotten gains and those of his family have been fully asset-stripped. Also, bedsores. Lots of bedsores.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It certainly feels that way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

Not fast enough.....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Whatever it is, I hope it hurts a lot.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

I hope it's something serious but on the cusp of treatment, cancelled because he shut down the NIH.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I heard it was childrapeolitus, and that he has had a really bad case of it for many decades.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

"White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the president wears bandages on the back of his hand because he's “literally constantly shaking hands.”

As if that were even a slightly reasonable explanation.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I have bandages on my finger tips because I type on a keyboard all day. Without these bandages, by fingers would fall off!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he’s getting bruised from constantly shaking hands, is that enough of a fucking problem too?!

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think easy bruising is a ton of conditions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] acme401@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

I hear no cheering or fireworks, so I'm guessing he's not.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I got a nice bottle of booze waiting for the announcement

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can the doctors be sued and brought to testify under oath that Donald is perfectly healthy?

Perjury has actual consequences IIRC

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I believe that between doctor patient confidentiality and HIPAA, that will be quite difficult.

Imagine that your doctor was forced to give testimony on your health. Nobody would want that.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Patient records can be subpoenaed but the request has to be relevant to a case. the persons defense as well as the provider has the right to argue against the release, though their arguments can be overruled and the provider can be compelled to release records and testify as to your diagnosis, treatment, clinical observations, etc.

It’s wild how people will regularly assume HIPAA is some magic force that protects them from government overreach. It’s not, at all. I’m not specifically shitting on you because I see this claim repeated all the time, even just here in this thread. Your providers should make the limitations of HIPAA more clear to you. They’re probably more concerned with getting you in and out to maximize billable time bc fee for service billing is fucked. That’s a whole different nightmare

A priest during confessional has more protection from being compelled to testify than any doctor or therapist. They even have stronger protections than lawyers. Lawyer client privilege can be overturned if you are found to be abusing it to plan crimes. If you brag to a clergy about all the crimes you’re gonna do (though if they help they will be punished for helping, the confessional is still inadmissible and protected). They are even usually exempt from mandated reporter laws (even though they’re often in the highest risk categories for child sex abuse). It’s fucked that this country gives a pass to pedophiles to rape kids because of a historical precedent towards fucking nonsense; meanwhile the fields built on a base of evidence that need to build trust have a cornerstone of “oh the judicial system can compel me if you become their enemy but btw if you go to church you can literally confess to raping kids and the murder you’re planning and no one will rat you out”.

Source: work in healthcare and have had records subpoenaed (successfully fought off 2/3 attempts, fuck you government)

But granted they aren’t getting trumps records. No fucking way. Even if someone had the balls to charge him with something and claim they needed them as evidence he’d get the entire government to make sure that never happened, even if it meant falsifying or even destroying the documents

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lohky@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does it? Does perjury have real consequences when literally nothing else does?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Id assume Trump would need to file a HIPPA release which ain't happening.

Now if this was a democratic president the supreme court would say that by accepting taxpayer funded healthcare, the citizens are thereby the payor/insurance company and that HIPPA authorizes release of protected health information to payors so the public is allowed to know subpoenad health information without a release.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Gawd, this douche, who clutched his pearls over...Biden.

FFS.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

File that one under "No Shit Sherlock." But he's going to dodder along for another 8 - 10 years.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

He has probably already forgotten his dementia diagnosis.

[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Best explanation I've seen for these bandages over bruises is he is receiving an infusion intravenously every two weeks of a type of medication for dementia, like Leqembi or Kisunla. Patients on these drugs require regular MRIs to monitor brain swelling or bleeding. The drugs cause side effects of fatigue, cardiovascular changes, dizziness, etc. It doesn't stop dementia but it does slow it down.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Trump died at 11:58 pst

🤞

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Considering he already walks and talks like a badly animated corpse, I don't think that would make much of a difference.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I do hope it's serious

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Wow solve any other capers by yourself there Nancy drew?

[–] brotato@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand why they always feel the need to cover up presidential health issues. I know the answer is “national security,” but how exactly is it secure to have a man in obvious mental and physical decline going around “shaking hands” with other world leaders? Just own up to it and have him die at Mar-a-lago playing golf like he probably wants. That was the whole point of having JD as a backup, right?

[–] QuantumStorm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

My bet is that they're trying to get to the two year mark before kicking Trump out. That way JD gets a little less than two years in the white house, but is still eligible to be president two more times.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

They think they'll last 10 years before they're ground into a paste.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

He wants to be on a coin so badly, he'll die for it. I say we increase the incentive, and offer him a stamp, too, even though he probably hates stamps for some MAGA reason.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 month ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Trumps period calendar rilled over end of last week. He'll be peppy for about 5-7 more days.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Tapper? You want the truth? That's funny.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It tells you a lot about the state of corporate media in US when a journalist stating an obvious fact is considered news.

Please die by the next month.. please..

[–] Wigglesworth@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 month ago

Good. It'll make it a surprise party.

load more comments
view more: next ›