I'm pretty sure this was created in a sound studio by Stanley Kubrick.
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
1189 points (99.3% liked)
pics
28523 readers
270 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
As the launch was happening I said to my wife "AI must be making Kubrick's job so much simpler" and she just sort of glared at me...
Like this
Or this
I’ve made better screenshots in KSP
Given Trump's bullshit, frankly, I just want to come in here and appreciate the absolute beauty of our world and its neighbour. I really fear what's about to happen.
Imagine being the furthest people away from Donald Trump.
I didn't know Mr. Hankey made the mission roster.
they fucked up the toilet within hours of launch. nasa if you have been reading me making fun of you I am available for consult on a design for a hose-based toilet that if it breaks, you've fucked up the entire spaceship on gods how did this fuck up.
i'm surprised they brought 10 days of shitbags but here we are
load more comments
(8 replies)
Must be peaceful up there.
Side note: Dizzy is fucking great. I should play it again!
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Glamour shot or our shield. Literally - the far side of the moon absorbs many small meteorites that might otherwise hit Earth. That's why it has no large mare, it's just oops all craters. Artemis II found 3 new craters since the last time the far side had been mapped in detail.
To be fair a lot of meteors hit earths atmosphere and disintegrate. Poor moon doesn’t have an atmosphere to protect it though
These types of photos always do remind me of the fact that we live in an incredibly hostile universe. Helps me to appreciate how lucky we are to have this watery rock with a big bubble around it to live on.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yeah but the one time (we think we know of) that we collided with another planet, the moon didn't even show up until just after. Fucking slacker.
And ever since then, it's been edging farther and farther away, like it has better things to do than take meteors to the face for us (and asteroids to the ass). We need some sort of tether or leash to keep it where it is.
Which just happens to be when it's the same apparent size as the sun, a lucky coincidence for anyone who has had the pleasure of seeing one, because this might be the only place in the entire galaxy where such a thing even happens.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That looks like a shoe print. Considering the size of it, it can only mean...
Big Foot confirmed!
And we "only" had to wait half a century since the last one, during which so much money was blown up in wars that it would have paid for this mission hundred-fold.
yeah but i've heard a nice explanation that basically the last 50 years were spent on developing IT, which we need for better rockets. so instead of flying with rockets directly in 1970, we paused, developed computers that can do meaningful and complex navigation, and then built rockets.
Before the Soviet space race started, NASA had plans to do a couple flybys then build a base that would become a shipyard for deeper space exploration so it’s kind of a “best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago” situation but still amazing to see every stage complete successfully. That’s great news for Artemis III
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I think I've found my new wallpaper.
Images.nasa.gov
What the hell is an .avif format? Anyway, you can just save it as .png and that works.
png is completely the wrong format for photos.
Why's that?
The short answer is size. Longer answer is because of how the compression works and it's not what it was designed for. PNG are more suited to graphics.
Not arguing that PNG is the right choice, but you want something lossless for science purposes, and this is a science image.
You can tell roughly what order the impact craters were formed by seeing what overlaps what; looks like the small impacts mostly followed the big impacts. Maybe the earth's orbit cleared out the bigger stuff first? If you had a really good image, you might be able to work out the average impact angle, and therefore the average speed of impact, since we know the speed of the moon, and how they would intersect. Nothing's filled with lava like it has on the near side of the moon, which makes me think these have mostly happened later in the moon's life, when it's cooled down a bit.
I just love space, I've no education in it. I bet someone with a fancy moon science degree would be able to tell you a lot more, and they'd be poring over every pixel. Don't want any JPEGs getting in the way of that.
I've been using it as a sort of litmus test for AI images. Even at a high quality setting, AVIF compresses them down to almost nothing.
Something to do with the lack of natural "jitter" in AI images and the way AVIF has been designed to perfectly deal with this.
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's a .webp file for me.
Chances are the program you're using supports all this crap, and ignores the extension anyway, because far too many people just rename files to "convert" them.
Only real way to be sure is to open it with a hex editor. The first few bytes will tell you what a file type really is.
Lemmy probably returns images in different formats depending on what client supports (and ones with better compression take precedence).
load more comments
(3 replies)
Best photo of the moon made by a regular camera.
Ain't no telescope gonna bring you this close.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That "highest resolution image of the moon" user on Reddit is gonna have to find a new gimmick.
Well they better give it back
Why don't they call it "leaving" a dump? After all, you're not actually taking it anywhere!
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›