this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
120 points (94.1% liked)

News

23301 readers
4480 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of all new cars are now SUVs, making them a major cause of the intensifying climate crisis, say experts

Sales of SUVs hit a new record in 2023, making up half of all new cars sold globally, data has revealed. Experts warned that the rising sales of the large, heavy vehicles is pushing up the carbon emissions that drive global heating.

The analysis, by the International Energy Agency, found that the rising emissions from SUVs in 2023 made up 20% of the global increase in CO2, making the vehicles a major cause of the intensifying climate crisis. If SUVs were a country, the IEA said, they would be the world’s fifth-largest emitter of CO2, ahead of the national emissions of both Japan and Germany.

Climate-fuelled extreme weather is increasing, with urgent cuts in emissions needed. But emissions from the global transport sector have risen fast in recent years, outside of the Covid pandemic. SUV sales rose 15% in 2023, compared with a 3% rise for conventional cars.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

GM doesn't even sell regular cars any more do they? All hatchbacks SUVs and trucks.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I was going to say something similar. Nobody sells small cars anymore. And if they do, they try as hard as they can to get you to buy something else. I'm currently trying to buy a Prius and I have one on hold, but it won't be available for months and when we went to various dealers, they just didn't have any to test drive and instead wanted us to test drive their SUVs. I've never wanted a large car. In fact, I would prefer if my next car was a small electric hatchback, but they just don't sell that here in the US.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think that lack of availability means that the dealer doesn't want you to buy a Prius. I suspect that it's more that they want you to buy from them rather than someone else, and if they don't have Priuses available, they'll try and sell you what they do have...shrugs

For the Prius, my understanding is that during the COVID-19 pandemic, a large backlog built up at automakers due to the disruption to production. Manufacturers don't want to hugely-overbuild production capacity just to throw it away when the backlog is resolved, so the backlog persisted through 2023 and is still apparently present for some cars. According to this, this apparently includes the Prius:

https://caredge.com/guides/factory-order-wait-times-2024#Toyota_Factory_Order_Wait_Times

In 2024, most Toyota models no longer have long waitlists for an available allocation, with the exceptions being the Prius, GR86, GR Corolla, Grand Highlander Hybrid, Land Cruiser, Sienna, Supra M/T and Spec Edition TRD Pros. For these models, you can expect to wait 3-4 months for an allocation that’s not already spoken for.

The thing that @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works mentioned was something that surprised me when I discovered it too -- consumer preference has shifted from sedans to hatchbacks. But you can still get sedans...just that not all companies are making them.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

GM tried killing the Bolt, a small and, cheap hatchback, and replacing it with the Equinox EV, a much more expensive SUV. They did not make any for 2024 because they were planning on ending production but we're met with tons of backlash for killing one of their most popular vehicles so they will be moving it to the Optium platform. I doubt they will lower the price of it despite them moving to Optium because it will allow cheaper production.

I get that larger vehicles offer higher margins but smaller commuter vehicles are still very necessary and wanted. The Bolt's sales figures show that pretty clearly.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Automakers aren’t encouraged to create more efficient small vehicles. The US emissions system is based on the vehicle’s footprint rather than its total output. Therefore, it’s more “climate friendly” in marketing to make an underpowered larger vehicle.

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN21D1KK/

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The US also imposes a tariff on import of light trucks -- which I understand large vehicles like crossovers are also classified as -- due to a 1960s dispute over US chicken exports to Europe that was never resolved, making those more-profitable for domestic manufacture, since the market is less-competitive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

The Chicken Tax is a 25 percent tariff on light trucks (and originally on potato starch, dextrin, and brandy) imposed in 1964 by the United States under President Lyndon B. Johnson in response to tariffs placed by France and West Germany on importation of U.S. chicken. The period from 1961 to 1964 of tensions and negotiations surrounding the issue was known as the "Chicken War", taking place at the height of Cold War politics.

Eventually, the tariffs on potato starch, dextrin, and brandy were lifted, but since 1964 this form of protectionism has remained in place to give US domestic automakers an advantage over imported competitors. Though concern remains about its repeal, a 2003 Cato Institute study called the tariff "a policy in search of a rationale."

I suppose that if European chicken protectionism ended, American auto protectionism also might, and so would the misincentive to sell as many light trucks as possible.

Another fun quirk that I expect -- though haven't looked into -- derives from this: American towing requirements have long been much higher than those in Europe. One needs a considerably larger vehicle to tow a given trailer legally. That effectively means that if one wants to tow things in the US, one effectively needs to pay the "chicken tax" to domestic automakers.

[–] Daveyborn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Malibu die off too? Cadillac still has sedans.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They are indeed killing the Malibu.

[–] Daveyborn@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Guess I'll be riding out my impala fleet (2 currently) til it dies, don't exactly have cadillac money.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The IEA said the main reasons behind the surge in SUVs were the “the appeal of SUVs as a status symbol”

SUVs now account for half of all new car sales

I mean, if half of what people are buying are SUVs, they can't be that much of a status symbol.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

That's new car sales. Compare it to used car sales and people who can't afford to buy a car at all, and it makes more sense.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I suspect the definitions here are being very liberally used to make the issue look worse than it is. I'd almost guarantee a majority of these vehicles are actually CUVs, essentially tall sedans with 4 or 6 cylinder engines and decent fuel efficiency, and not SUVs like the Tahoe, Suburban, Expedition, etc that are sitting on full frames with V8 engines getting 12MPG.

I also agree the whole 'status symbol' angle is bunk too as nobody is looking at your Nissan Rogue or Jeep Compass as a status symbol.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Well, if you don’t have one then you’re in the bottom half obviously. That can’t be good to be rolling around on 49th percentile wheels.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 5 months ago (4 children)

My impression is that every generation that has kids wants to drive something other what their parents drove, because doing so would make them stodgy and boring.

Go back to the 1960s, and the "family vehicle" was the station wagon.

Then it became the minivan for the next generation.

Then the SUV for the next.

I'm not sure I'd call what I usually see driving around now an SUV...rather, crossovers.

[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I think that there might be a certain size that is just comfortable for a car. Elderly people really can't get into small micro-cars, like a Honda Fit, it's hard to maneuver into them if an older person has joint pain. I think that's why crossovers are popular, they're just regulars cars that have been given a 6inch lift and a hatchback to make storage easier.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

For sure, most of them are crossovers. And get decent gas mileage compared to real SUVs. When I was a kid, an SUV was like, an Explorer. Or a Tahoe. My unibody Equinox is basically just a tall station wagon. I'd say my Traverse might border on SUV with its AWD and towing package, but it is still a unibody and has a limited towing capacity. And it gets at least as good of mileage as my old Pontiac G6 that it replaced.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Station wagons remain extremely popular in Europe (even though SUVs have eaten a good bit of their share). It's the most sensible if you need more space than a hatchback without all the stupid compromises from SUVs (also smaller SUVs provide much less space than a good wagon). I'd only prefer a small van like a recent Citroen Berlingo, but they are expensive, older ones are not that economical and also not comfortable/"sexy".

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

Crossovers are just taller station wagons.

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We need to drive electric cars says man who flys everywhere on a private jet.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't think Damian Carrington flies* much of anywhere in a private jet.

Tap for spoilerHe's the author of this article

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure he was referring to Musk.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

...why? Did a Ctrl+F for "Musk" on the article and found nothing.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I agree with the "fuck, Elon" sentiment especially considering he will use his plane to fly 15 miles, but private air travel makes up a negligible amount of CO2 emissions.

[–] derrickoswald@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

This is 100% a China and US problem - nowhere else in the world would these Wankpanzers be a status symbol. What's required is a re-education of the Nouveau Riche to make a better choice.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

Global birth of farting and shitting humans reaches a high in 2024. Sigh.