this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
546 points (96.4% liked)

196

4606 readers
1454 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Show transcriptScreenshot of a Mastodon toot by @ebassi@mastodon.social:

The whole open source community loves Milkshake Laptops, a lovely laptop company that has ethical values! 5 seconds later We regret to inform you the laptop company stans fascists

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RiceBowl@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I cannot understand why Nirav, the head of the company, would weigh in here instead of having the PR/Marketing team ~~of~~ or someone come up with an answer for this. Made it so much worse and I have such a bad feeling about them now.

Maybe some Ben Franklin will help them “It takes many good deeds to build a reputation, and only one bad one to lose it.” “Never ruin an apology with an excuse.”

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just get an old ThinkPad like me, problem solved!

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (10 children)

No, it's Lenovo, but the kind that still has a CPU socket and a removable battery, one of which could have been a nice addition to framework if they didn't insist on "modern design sensibilities"...

[–] GEEXiES@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“modern design sensibilities”

How I dislike laptops not having trackpad buttons! No matter how good modern trackpads are, I still just want buttons. And lots of keys, and switches... and screws. Don't care how clean and sleek modern laptops look, they are a tool for me.

  • Bonus points for the trackpoint!
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago
  • Bonus points for the trackpoint!

BRING BACK THE CLIT STICK

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 132 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From what I read, it sounds like they were supporting a bunch of different projects based on “oh hey this is kind of neat and could be useful” and didn’t really look in to the background of the relevant devs.

The thread on their forum reads like them wandering in to something, reading the objection as some obscure beef and running the standard PR approach without really realizing what a mess they just stuck their foot into.

Hopefully their cage will be rattled enough to look in to it and pull back.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 97 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah the user who responds by saying:

This is not a “I do not like this distribution” kind of argument.

This is a “the people you are sending my money to want me and my friends dead or deported” kind of argument.

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

Kind of nails it I think. For what it's worth I don't think there's any malicious intent on Framework's part necessarily, I think maybe they've just naively stepped on a bit of a landmine? But still, not ideal.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Someone else struck an important chord:

Additional edit: I think it’s quite telling that a community response of “I’m not happy with this development, please consider changing your mind or I’m going to spend my money elsewhere” is now being met in this thread with responses including inflammatory fascist and racist talking points, transphobia, etc, while Framework says and does nothing about it. It shows exactly the sorts of things Framework is permitting in their “big tent” by rewarding right-wing extremists with money and sponsorship. What a way to tank a community that – a few years ago at least – seemed pretty welcoming and inclusive.

The community defense is riddled with typical far-right talking points. "What do you mean you don't want to include literal nazis in your community? What ever happened to tolerance?"

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well that's all very disappointing.

There truly is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

[–] katharta@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

Intolerance will not be tolerated.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 88 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is very in the weeds. They sponsor open source projects as a little side thing. One of the projects they sponsored is very bad, and they were publicly called out about it less than 24 hours ago. Not even enough time to make a proper response. I can't even find on their website where they list the open source projects they sponsor. Open source sponsorship was never a major part of their business.

This is very new news. Give them time and form your opinion on their response. Its likely that only a small subset of the team works on open source sponsorship, so most of those in charge of the company were likely unaware until now.

edit: fixed several undecillion minor typos

[–] Unknown_0671@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago (11 children)

first of all, its two projects. second both got most promotion by them then other projects they sponsered. third their official people (not sure how high up but still) have responded in the thread badly. fourth the thread has no positive affirmation that they care about the fascism support but more "this specific case is probably not that", its not hard to say u dont support fascists

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

As another example of this sort of thing, shopify, cloudflare, futo, jetbrains are sponsoring ladybird, while Kling apparently shares DHH's views. It's definitely generally bad to support a project led by this sort of person, and now that they know about it I think they should stop, but idk if i'd condemn the whole company over it. Especially as it often requires quite a bit of research to find out about that sort of stuff unless you were there when the social media drama happened.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i don’t think unknowingly supporting shitty people is that bad. mistakes happen, after all.

knowingly supporting shitty people, and then saying it’s fine because you’re wanting to create a big tent that includes everyone, even fascists, is bad! very bad!

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Also, if you have semi-plausible deniability that you didn't know, but you had an inkling and you didn't want to find out... That's not great either.

Not knowing isn't a full excuse if you actively try to not find out.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

"let's sit Nazis at our table so we get all viewpoints!"

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

while Kling apparently shares DHH's views

Who are those people and why are their views important?

[–] themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

kling is the creator/head of the ladybird browser. dhh is the creator of ruby on rails, but he's now working on omarchy, which is basically just a collection of dotfiles for arch but people love for some reaso (personal rant).

the reason that their views are important is because a lot of tech companies, even ones that were previously reputable like framework, have been pouring a lot of money into these. this is especially relevant for omarchy, since afaik dhh is the only person working on it, making donations to omarchy basically be direct donations to dhh himself.

while kling has done some questionable things, dhh is basically just a straight up fascist, which really puts the principles of the companies giving money and promotion to him (like framework) into question

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If the community reacts super strongly to this before framework even has the chance to properly investigate, respond, and react to this kind of issue, why would they ever want to risk investing in open source projects in the future? Come on, people. Give them time and if you have to hate on a company hate on the bigger ones that do these sorts of things on purpose and get away with it. I understand informing Framework and putting pressure on them to fix things, but there's such a thing as going too far.

They already made one (very poor) response and that's what's got most people doubling down to keep the pressure on them to change their stance. I really dont see how a bunch of forum posts could possibly be "too far".

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago

The community reacts so strongly because they made clear it's a deliberate choice.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it weren’t for the out of touch, deeply offensive responses they already made, this likely would not have blown up. The fact that they responded in such a dismissive, disgusting way is the reason this is news.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

I would have been happy with a corpo

"We will be reviewing our philanthropic practices going forward."

With pure neutral tone and no mention of the politics.

That's the corpo correct answer. And its concerning they didn't give that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have a big tent too but you know who's not under it? Fascists

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Can I come in please? I'd love to be somewhere fascisn't.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 2 days ago (23 children)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

if system76 turns out to be shitheads imma blow up the earth with a illudium q-36 explosive space modulator

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 2 days ago

they personally fucked me over years ago on a screen replacement i was willing to pay for.

they wanted to charge me 600 usd just for the panel that was available on aliexpress for 80

ended up doing it myself, and then spending 80k usd on a different company's hardware for the company i worked for that used linux desktops

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›