this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
276 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26573 readers
1027 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 135 points 1 day ago (7 children)

In a brief order, the conservative majority argued, among other things, that the District Court had intervened to block the maps too close to next year’s midterm election.

Eleven months away is too close to the next election for these clowns.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 83 points 1 day ago

The decision has nothing to do with their stated reasons; they are in favor of racism, but don't want to say so

[–] HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dont forget 9 months is too close to an election to approve a supreme court justice nomination, unless the president is Republican and then less than a month is plenty of time

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Election was already underway. There were already absentee balls cast ousting him from office when they approved his nomination

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck that shit. They use this argument whenever it suits them. And what suits this fascist admin, suits the SCOTUS.

Didn't Trump himself appoint SCOTUS judges "too close" to the election? Clowns.

[–] Thebular@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Barrett, for starters. Nominated 38 days prior to the 2020 election, and confirmed just 8 days prior.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

But wouldn't the opposite be true? Changing the maps too close to the election is a problem. "Keeping them the same too close to the election" makes no sense.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Texas passed their new maps on August 29th. On November 18 the district court ordered them to revert to their previous maps.

Apparently the SC’s Republican cult members think this will be too difficult for Texas?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They've already gutted the VRA. This is reaffirming the decision.

No no, dont even give it that much dignity. The complainants are not asking to "block the map" too close (11 months) to elections. They are asking that the map not be illicit, unethically changed 5 years early, based off the explicit public request of the President who is not meant to have power over state election matters, with the explicitly stated intent of gerrymandering out more seats for Republicans that they "deserve" than they otherwise would have won, only 15ish months to the elections (which is apparently plenty of time). Their "reasoning" doesn't make sense because it's not reasoning. It's blatant full chested support of voter suppression/disenfranchisement to bolster their party and their autocratic President. They're so full of shit you could smell them talking from the next room over. Fuck those lying, cheating, corrupt, un-American, fascist cunts.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The Supreme Kangaroo Court of the United States strikes again. It’s kind of amazing that out of 9 justices we have 2 avowed rapists, not to mention several christian nationalists.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I 100% blame the Democratic party for this. They've been assisting the Republicans in their efforts to create this court for the last 40 years. Thomas should never have been confirmed to the court and Ruth Bader Ginsberg hung on at a time when she should have left while the "liberal" dems controlled both the presidency and the Senate and could easily have replaced her with a(n at least mostly) liberal justice.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

It’s also frustrating that they let a seat be stolen.

McConnell invents a rule out of whole cloth and blocks an appointment.

The Dems could have played hard ball, they could have gone with the line that the senate was fulfilling its role of advising and consenting by not holding a vote. They want it to be read as a rejection, make them hold a vote, say that no vote means they are fine with it.

Republicans exceed their powers every time they have them to reshape this country to their vision. Democrats refuse to use the full scope of their power to accomplish anything.

Repeat ad nauseam.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I would still place some blame on Republicans for insisting on nominating sexual offenders, corrupt pieces of shit, etc. Yes the Dems should have done more to stop them, but i think the GOP should bear some responsibility for being sociopaths

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Republicans aren’t people (although they are human). Blaming them is like blaming rabid animals. You might think this is an exaggeration. Technically, only 5% of people are psychopathic, but the condition is a spectrum. Sub-diagnostically, it’s closer to 30% of the population. Those are the folks happy to ban abortion, criminalize homosexuality, etc. A main feature of psychopathy is an indifference to the truth, moral and empirical, and the suffering of others.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

With the benefit of hindsight we know RBJ should have stepped down sooner, but realistically the last opportunity was in 2014. Blaming her (and the democrats) entirely, but not blaming the republicians who blocked Obama's nomination is like blaming an abuse survivor for what happened to them, and not the abuser.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

She died in 2020 of old age. How much foresight do you fucking need. She should have stepped down and a lot of people were telling her that.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Of course they did. Now let's see their rationale for overturning Californias.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 day ago

It's too close to the election to not do it

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Does it even fucking matter at this point? There will be zero repercussions for the blatant disregard for the law to serve the authoritarian regime so they can say whatever they want

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

If that happens, nations around the globe should really wake up to the threat coming from the USA.

...oh, who am I kidding...

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, for real. Let’s hope the Majestic Imperious High Court deigns to grace us with any explanation. They love their emergency docket…

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Here's the fun part. They'll use the shadow docket and won't give any rationale.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

At what point can I stop pretending we have a functioning government?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It functions pretty well at enriching a select few corporations and wealthy elites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We should start calling it Robertsmander rather than Gerrymander from now on. If having no shame while he's living has no effect, then the best he deserves is his name being tarnished and synonymous with corruption for hundreds of years.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are Robertsmadering

It's heavily Robertsmandered

They want to Robertsmander everything

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly as expected. Next they'll find that California's redistricting is unconstitutional.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I obviously disagree with this ruling, but if they were to rule the opposite on California, the absolute sheer corruptness would be undeniable. And worthily of drastic and dramatic action on our (the citizens) part.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The corruption is already undeniable.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Okay but then it'll be double plus undeniable. People will definitely do something in response. You'll see.

Their sheer corruptness is already undeniable. The six right wing hacks regularly make decisions that are blatantly and obviously unconstitutional and write nonsense opinions to justify them. They openly accept huge bribes from those impacted by their decisions and then rule in their favor. If the GOP gave a damn about the rule of law and the Constitution they would have been impeached long ago.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Citizens wouldn't even vote in their own interest, and now it's too late. I'm convinced tens of millions of Americans will die quietly before even one stands up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heydo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feels like we need to have a Get the Fuck Out protest.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's very cute of you, however, fascism is there to stay.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

If it's too close to the election they need to approve a bill through legislature that changes need to happen before a specific number of days before an election, otherwise they are just legislating from the bench pretending it's legal. Which is obviously the case here because they can't argue justifications for their racist bullshit in an open forum. "The government can break the law whenever it wants, what are you going to do about it" seems to be the SC opinion here.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

This is why America can't have nice things

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fascinating stuff! It's like russia with extra steps and a gigantic amount of comical ostentatious posturing about freedoms and liberty.

Americans do love their theatrics!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every day MAGA trash feels safe leaving their homes is a day the rest of you show your cowardice, America

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

Its a hard thing to come to terms with. Families are split in two To take up arms means we are doing it against our own family members. In my case it would be my father and brother.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until.. yadda yadda!

[–] molestme247@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Is it supper time yet?

Everything is shitty and terrible and we’re not even a year in. :(

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

When mom says no, just ask dad.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Agreed! It's MUCH too Close to an Election to Make Changes!

-The Supreme Court Justice who was appointed AFTER people ALREADY Voted!

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

It’s so long past the point that Americans should have begun shooting these traitors, they’re just gonna fucking let the fascism happen and tweet about it at this point.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way that special election in Tennessee went, instead of picking up five seats, they're liable to only be left with five seats (after all, you can't grab more districts without weakening your hold on others).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›