this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
446 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15649 readers
1393 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 31 points 2 days ago

Bicycles are vehicles. I definitely own it.

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been riding motorcycles for a couple decades and now that they're all fancy and computer controlled, most bike have their ECUs cracked within a couple years. Granted most of the time it's to remove Euro-5 emissions controls 🙄, or remove speed limiters. But could this be an option to disable car surveillance?

I recognize car companies will probably retaliate by saying you voided warranty, but so far most motorcycle companies don't do that.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are those still content with gas engine performance.

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I sincerely doubt this will be limited to EVs going forward.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

No, they use them because of the smell and noise. Infant seeking attention.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 151 points 3 days ago
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Good to see rural truck bros starting to learn what supporting authoritarians will get them.

[–] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago

Theyre a little too late, actually a lotta too late

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 73 points 3 days ago (13 children)

More reasons to own a bike, the government can't do shit!

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 27 points 3 days ago (19 children)

What if car industry sponsored government doesn't allow bike lanes?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 days ago

I wasn't asking for permission.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It cracks me up to see bike companies adding wireless electronic shit to bikes, like, shifting and turn signals. Those bikes will die while my 2008 trek hybrid keeps rolling.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man an e bike is the shit though if you live in a hilly city, that one is def not a gimmick lol

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a gimmick if it requires phone app or internet connection. An electric motor doesn't need to connect to a server in order to work.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

we live in a fucking dystopian nightmare, i hate it here

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 82 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We were due for a new car, but because of all the data garbage wasn't keen on brand new. My wife found a 2004 car in mint mechanical condition and pristine interior, so went back in time.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 36 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Maybe a company somewhere will recognize this emerging market.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dystopian. This shit is going to be everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"acoustic lip reading"? Reading lips by sound waves wouldn't they just put a microphone in there?

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Theres probably sone regulation against actually just recording the conversation...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most states require two party consent to record audio otherwise it's wiretapping.

Acoustic ultrasonic distance mapping isn't counted as wiretapping. They aren't recording your speech, they're inferring your speech.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s actually the other way around. There are only 11 two-party consent states. All the rest, plus DC are single-party consent, but usually the single consenting party has to be one of the participants of the conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Even ebikes are going to shit with all their DRM, if you want a high end one

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

No surprise coming from a company that was founded by a nazi and also build most cop cars.

load more comments
view more: next ›