this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
312 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30069 readers
3233 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

James Talarico has been found guilty of quoting Jesus. The sentence he uttered, according to right-wing media, was “demonic” and “blasphemous,” exposing him as a “fake Christian.” Talarico is running for the U.S. Senate in Texas on a platform The New Yorker recently described as basically the New Testament. One Newsmax host accused him of using fake Bible passages.

The passages in question are familiar ones, found in Matthew 22 and Matthew 25. Love God and love your neighbor. Feed the hungry, heal the sick, welcome the stranger. They are, in fact, in the Bible.

The right’s attacks on Talarico aren’t about him, or at least not entirely. They’re about a much older argument — one progressive Christianity has been losing in public for 50 years — about whose version of the faith gets to count as real. The answer to that question has consequences far beyond any Senate race. When Christianity becomes a tool of power rather than a challenge to it, it doesn’t just damage the church. It destabilizes democracy. We are watching that happen in real time.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nil@piefed.ca 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I know nothing about Christ but America right now seems to be completely against it

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I know an average amount about Christ, considering my upbringing... and I agree with you

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I went to catholic schools and yeah America hates the sumbitch. Well except the people who dislike Christianity, we tend to be pro corporal works of mercy.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 1 points 8 hours ago

I went to a catholic high school run by Dominican nuns who were some of the least christian people it has ever been my misfortune to meet.

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 129 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That tracks. No one is as unfamiliar with, and vehemently opposed to, the words of Jesus more than American Christians.

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Hypochrists.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet a large majority violate what it says to do every day.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Their ‘Christianity’ says that as long as you go to the proper church and agree with everything the pastor says, you have an automatic ‘get into Heaven free’ card, so you can be an evil, mouth breathing cunt and it doesn’t matter.

No surprise, it’s popular among the lazy set that prefer to be told they can be as evil as they like, rather than being told they have to improve themselves.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Sola fide is a scourge on the souls of Christians

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some of the very nastiest people I've ever met in my life were xtians that were just like that. The icing on the cake was that during a period of my life when I was in the hard atheism camp, these types would taunt me and say that I was going to (their) hell and they were going to be in heaven watching me burn.

Nothing about any of that kind of "morality" makes even the least bit of sense. Douchebags like this who claimed they are "saved" and can behave like total monsters in their lives would be eternally rewarded, while someone that didn't accept the fairy tales they did would be eternally tormented? The only differentiating factor is that they "accepted Jayzus into their heart".

That sounds more like the fantasies of psychopath rather than any kind of moral system.

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

"Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones." - Marcus Aurelius (misattributed)

A good person would reward good people for being good. If Jesus won't reward a good person for being good just because they haven't "accepted him into their heart" well... I said what I said.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 5 points 1 day ago

I think you'd be surprised how many progressive and very moderate Christians there are in the US, they're just not a political force in the same way as the billionaire-funded extremists

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"American Conservative Christians" are not Christians. They never have been.

Yeah, this unfortunately. Christian nationalists will never and cannot enter the kingdom of heaven

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

In actuality, their favorite parts of the bible are when God mercilessly slaughters innocent babies.

Which is still hilarious to me because even Paul straight up named the fruit of the spirit and it is not them lol.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 4 points 11 hours ago

Yup, and also a common meme template

[–] wolfeh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like a Chick tract. Find the one about Harry Potter... it's hilarious.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I've always found the D&D one hilarious.

No, it's Jesus

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Meanwhile only the sound of crickets when Hexseth quoted fake Bible passages from Pulp Fiction.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ is DEMONIC!

-Christians!

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 25 points 1 day ago

He would be arrested by ICE if he was in the U.S. today.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They went on Fox News the other night and said “when I look at this white preacher from Texas all I can think about is MOLESTING TRANS KIDS”

They really think they got everyone hypnotized like some kinda three stooges skit

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Molesting trans kids? Who do they think they are? Jeffrey Epstien?

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These cunts wouldn't know Jesus if he descended from heaven with trumpets and handed them a Bible.

They'd have ICE detain him for having the wrong color skin.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When Christianity becomes a tool of power rather than a challenge to it, it doesn’t just damage the church. It destabilizes democracy. We are watching that happen in real time.

I'm not American, but I am a Christian, and I believe that wholeheartedly. Religions, including my own, should never hold political power. However religion can and should serve as a reminder that temporal authority is subject to something higher, thereby tempering and relativizing secular power, which is always tempted to absolutize itself.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The drive for absolute power has nothing to do with secularism. Religious power does the same thing.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Indeed. And that's why religion shouldn't be in power at all. Its focus on transcendent truths makes it dangerous in government, but as a counterbalance to authority it is effective and beneficial.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

None of our leaders in the west believe in anything, let alone christianity, they are nihilists that believe in nothing other than self advancement, and that follows to business leaders. There will be no tempering of the temporal authority from religion, or anywhere else, absent some holy wrath.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

religion can and should serve as a reminder that temporal authority is subject to something higher, thereby tempering and relativizing secular power

Until such higher power asserts itself, these people will not be deterred.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When Christianity becomes a tool of power rather than a challenge to it

🧑🏻‍🚀🔫🧑🏻‍🚀

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Religion has always been a tool of power.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago

Absolutely. The first commandments of the Jewish and Christian faiths aren't about obedience and exclusivity (with murder an afterthought in comparison) by coincidence.

It was always about controlling the masses, never about freeing or empowering them.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The Xtn right is becoming the type of power our nation's founders came here to get away from. Their influence corrupts both faith and government. Blaming cross-dressers for grooming children when the actual news headlines are pastors and priests abusing kids. They have become the American Taliban.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The xtian right wing cannot really be considered to be following the things that the character of Jesus is made to say in their own texts.

They should not really be called xtians. And no, I'm not trying for the No True Scotsman thing here...

At best, they might be considered Paulians

since they seem to be so very different....

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

And no, I’m not trying for the No True Scotsman thing here…

Yet you are literally doing that.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ahh yes, the national socialists of religious demographics, hiding behind an ideology like a fucking brand while doing the exact opposite of everything it demands they practice in life, back with another thing to say. How about they fuck off. Christians need to much more vocally call out the disingenuous weaponization of their belifs in the purusit of power, I know these evangelical freaks are a minority, they just own all the major media so they get to have the loudest voice. Still, it needs to be rubbed in their face every single day that they would be the ones to crucify Jesus again if he did come back like they claim to want.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

“Religion, too, is a weapon. What manner of weapon is religion when it becomes the government?”

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Right Trash shit talk! The ignorant reality tv loving sonsabitches ain’t gonna like reality when election time comes around!