this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
339 points (98.3% liked)

politics

30138 readers
2540 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Members of Trump’s own party have lined up to condemn the deal, which pledges to help fund Iran and scrap sanctions

Republicans have turned on Donald Trump over his plan to end the war with Iran, accusing him of making the “worst foreign policy blunder in decades”.

The U.S. released the 14-point interim agreement on Wednesday as Trump signed the documents in Versailles, France. The terms included stopping the conflict and reopening the vital shipping route, the Strait of Hormuz, but also financing Iran’s recovery with a $300bn fund and scrapping sanctions.

“Reagan is rolling over in his grave,” said Louisiana senator Bill Cassidy on Wednesday, referring to the former president Trump admires.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey republicans: you know that idiot that everyone said was an idiot and that we all warned you was an idiot? Turns out he’s an idiot.

And a liar. And a diddler.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Mostly a diddler. Lock him up.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because he’s dumb as fucking dirt. Seriously! He is not a smart man in any way.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The blunder was getting involved at all. This MOU is about as "good" a deal as possible, under the circumstances.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

And it really isn't even a "deal." The MOU is just a promise to talk about specific things during the actual negotiations later on. And a lot of those things are non-starters for either Trump or Iran.

And Israel can come along and fark the whole thing up at any time.

[–] bloviate@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago

GOOD HE SHOULD FUCKING BE ABANDONED AND DIE (politically) ALONE

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What if it's not a blunder. What if Trump is purposefully trying to destroy the country?

If you look at every action he's taken in that light, it all makes sense.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

The purpose of a system is what it does.

So if you view the trump presidency as a system, then yes its purpose was to destroy the American political system and impoverish the working class.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 125 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You voted for it.

People pointed out that Trump had tried to deny his own nephew health care. That he had ties to the New York Mafia. That he had boasted of perving on young women. That he had a history of catastrophic business failures. That he had a history of lying so bad his own lawyers had to double team him to get the facts...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

Not only that, but he was president already for four years and it was catastrophic

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

... and they'll do it again!

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

MTG picked the perfect moment to leave Congress.

At this point, I have her as the front runner for the 2028 GOP nomination.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I guess we'll see. On the one hand she's a blithering idiot, which is a feature for the smoothbrains that vote Republican.

But on the other hand, she doesn't have a penis, which might make it really hard for the Nat-C types in her base to overcome. I mean, their own text prohibits women having dominion over men.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, we've already seen them vote for and otherwise support women (including MTG herself) for political office, so it seems this "principle" is pretty flexible/unimportant compared to all the hateful shit they'd like to get up to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've never spoken to her, or met anyone who has. But let's look at the facts.

She didn't just leave Congress. She waited until a point in the news cycle where she'd get a lot of notice. She gave up her office before being placed in a position to go against Trump in a realistic way [e.g. voting for impeachment.]

She's in a great position to be a TV pundit for the midterms, which means more money and more exposure.

For a nitwit, she's played some pretty cunning moves.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For a nitwit, she’s played some pretty cunning moves.

I agree, assuming she's making a play here.

I think a lot of these people might be incredibly stupid at some things [1] and incredibly crafty and cunning at manipulation and scheming.

[1] Or great at acting like they are fucking morons to get the base to like them because the base confuses being smart with being "elitist".

For one of the most extreme examples of this acting like a dumbshit act, see ol' Foghorn Leghorn himself, Senator John Kennedy, is a Rhodes Scholar, who has a motherfuckin' degree from Oxford. From his public persona, you'd probably never know this, since he sounds like a blend of Foghorn Leghorn and Hee Haw in his ridiculous folksy persona. For someone that now feigns to be so confused about things like gender, he sure has had quite the transition himself...

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I always admired the way George W. Bush could be a Yale graduate with a vast fortune and a simple cowboy at the same time.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

100%. I was going to bring him up, too, but my post was getting overly long as-is. 😀

I think some blogger had put up earlier W being quite sharp in some debate he had then contrasted that with some derpy thing he was saying during one of his two terms.

They were not necessarily politicians, but you'd see the same kind of thing (I think some people called it "redneck drag") in the Duck Dynasty guys. There were plenty of people pointing out that these guys all looks like typical upper-class types, then at some point before the show, were sporting mountain man beards and plenty of camo.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

She is just insane enough to make it work. Then again she is a woman. And shes fetal alcohol syndrome or whatever that is. That's the redeeming quality.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think she'll ever make a serious bid at the presidency. She might throw her hat into the ring to grift and raise money but MAGA will never accept a woman as a leader and even the majority of conservatives think any white man is better than a competent woman or non-white individual.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

Look, all I'm saying is let's give the leopard a few more chomps at it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (6 children)

You voted for it.

I mean, half the joke is that they didn't vote for it. Trump has been outspokenly in opposition to wars abroad, in direct refutation to members of his own party (during the primary) and the opposition (during the general). American national politics is a sucking void of anti-war candidates, such that even a serial liar and shameless two-faced shit can fill it.

Incidentally, taking an anti-war tact is how Obama beat Hillary in 2008. And how he obliterated McCain several months later. And "Double Gitmo" Mitt Romney four years after that. It's also how Clinton beat Bush Sr in '92 (people hating Operation Desert Storm). And it was a long-forgotten part of the Bush Jr campaign against Gore (criticizing US involvement in East Africa and the Baltic States). Hell, Kennedy and LBJ both campaigned as anti-war candidates. They beat Nixon by promising to de-escalate the Cold War (and avoid any future Korean Wars). And then Nixon ran the same playbook eight years later. Reagan beat Carter on similar grounds (peaceful extraction from Iran).

Candidates regularly run - and win - on anti-war positions, only to enter office and reverse course, generating a backlash as a result. Trump's just the latest and most glaring example.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He bankrupted a casino. That should be everything you need to know

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

*multiple times*

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

He got caught saying 'grab them by the pussy.' That wasn't enough.

A conservative woman went on the TV show The View to defend him.

Another panelist kept repeating 'pussy' over and over.

Finally the conservative lady had to demand that the other panelist stop using that offensive word.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Decades? No, this is the worst blunder ever. This is worse than Vietnam and Iraq because it's more stupid and incompetent.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

What? How? Cutting and running makes this much less of a blunder than either of those cases.

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then impeach and remove him from office. You have the power to do this. Until you put rubber to road and actually do this then this is just lip service to try and help midterm turnout for republicans.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's all for show. They'll bend the knee.

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They’ve turned on Trump so many times now they could be generating electricity.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Invariably these articles about Republicans/magas turning on trump use headlines that make it sound like it's some kind of sea change, and then you get into the article and it's one or two people.

[–] thenewred@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

But did it distract from the epstein files?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Turned on him?

Is he in shackles?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Bill Cassidy (primaried by trump), Nikki Hayley (ousted by trump), and some fox news sewer rat.

That’s the “members of trumps own party!”

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ronnie Raygun's "legacy" is far overblown (how quickly people want to brush aside Iran/Contra, which was worse than Watergate), most especially by the "liberal media" and the conservatives, but yeah, PEDOnald's debacle here managed to look even stupider than Vietnam, Ronnie Raygun and W.

Hopefully this keeps him from doing stupid shit with Panama, Cuba, Greenland, Canada, Mexico, and ___ and even more stupid shit with Venezuela...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 16 points 3 days ago

Then maybe they should have done something about it.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Republicans have turned on Donald Trump over his plan to ~~end~~ start the war with Iran, accusing him of making the “worst foreign policy blunder in decades”.

Fixed it for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago
[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

worst foreign policy deal in the history of foreign policy deals maybe ever.

[–] Saffire@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Worst foreign policy blunder so far.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Why not just say it? The USA lost a war with Iran.

load more comments
view more: next ›