this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
339 points (98.8% liked)

News

23267 readers
3055 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Climate denialists – 23 in Senate and 100 in House – are all Republicans and make US an outlier internationally

US politics is an outlier bastion of climate denial with nearly one in four members of Congress dismissing the reality of climate change, even as alarm has grown among the American public over dangerous global heating, an analysis has found.

A total of 123 elected federal representatives – 100 in the House of Representatives and 23 US senators – deny the existence of human-caused climate change, all of them Republicans, according to a recent study of statements made by current members.

“It’s definitely concerning,” said Kat So, campaign manager for energy and environment campaigns at the Center for American Progress, who wrote the report.

The report defined climate deniers as those who say that the climate crisis is not real or not primarily caused by humans, or claim that climate science is not settled, that extreme weather is not caused by global warming or that planet-warming pollution is beneficial.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dotdi@lemmy.world 92 points 3 months ago

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

― Upton Sinclair

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That seems like a fair reflection of the US population who deny climate change.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

most GOP voters just bleat what they're told to bleat by fox news and the 0.001% who have a financial interest in never moving away from fossil fuels

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

But the amount of that is too damn high, too!

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Which surely couldn't have anything to do with underfunded schools, book bannings, and sensationalised news.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

I wonder if the venn diagram of climate change deniers and those who receive significant contributions from the oil lobby is essentially a circle.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

Koch brother: I missed how many? It's a good thing my brother is dead or he'd kill me for not buying all of them! Well at least we have half the Senate, that's all we really need.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

They're very good at making up things!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And that's just the ones denying it...

Lots more understand it's a real thing, but are perfectly happy we set record breaking fossil fuels production under Biden.

Because it's one of the few things propping up "the economy".

Unfortunately pulling coal out of the ground and shipping it to China where they burn coal less efficiently leads to even more climate change than just burning it here.

If the rest really cared, we wouldn't be breaking records as we speak

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i might be misreading your point - apologies if so.

shipping coal to china

Was this a general, global statement? Or specifically the US mining coal to sell to china?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Here's an article about the records we broke under Biden:

https://www.vox.com/climate/24098983/biden-oil-production-climate-fossil-fuel-renewables

Here's some specifically about shipping coal to China:

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/more-coal-is-being-shipped-by-sea-than-ever-before

https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/us-coal-shipments-to-china-surge-more-than-30-fold-amid-australian-trade-dispute-66154595

But for your question:

Both. It's not unique to the US, even though that's what I was talking about. And China is (meant isn't) the only country with few regulations buying it up.

Across the globe countries do stuff like a small amount of electric buses because voters do care about climate change. However as they use less fossil fuels, they still produce the same or even more. They just ship them to countries with less regulations resulting in more pollution before even factoring in the carbon costs to transport it.

Because climate change is a global issue, it still hurts the original country along with everyone else.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thanks - to be clear I wasn’t challenging you, just asking a follow up question, I appreciate the sources!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No worries, I should have thrown some on the first comment.

People want things to better which is good.

But often they reflexively get mad when you point out things aren't better just because some things around you are better.

If we're going to fix a global problem, we need to look at the whole globe, not just what's next to us.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

This is exactly why I hate uplifting news about some places reducing their emissions or other pollution. It paints the accomplishments as happening in a vacuum, when in fact the problem likely has been moved elsewhere. If all the major countries are decreasing pollution but the global picture still shows an increase, are we really fixing anything, or just shuffling the numbers around?

Nature is the only one not lying.