...we've all violated national security oaths and SCIF protocol?..yeah, no...
Not The Onion
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
What the fuck headline is that. No, we haven't done that, because we're careful about that shit.
Way to normalize a massive failure of leadership and criminal act, USA Today.
Well, the newspaper is certainly living up to its name.
Trying to fucking normalize this, complicit media bitch. What a shit article.
uh no i've never accidentally added a journalist to a group chat while laughing about bombing people in the middle east.
You gotta admit, though, that 11-year-old boy might make a good Secretary of Defense after this one.
!That’s why the Trump administration’s Signalgate blunder was all anyone could talk about on news shows and social media, in workplaces, even in schools, said New York University psychology professor Tessa West.
Even West’s 11-year-old son came home from school Monday and confessed that he, too, had once added the wrong person to a group chat. “Mommy I did that, I did exactly what those Trump people did,” he told her.
“For 11-year-old boys, this is the most relatable thing that the Trump administration has done, which just shows you just how ubiquitous this experience is from Slack channels to group chats,” West said. “We’ve all done this.”!<
What a trash article. It reads like propaganda. This kind of reporting is frustrating. Framing a serious security breach—like the Trump administration's Signal group chat blunder—as relatable because “even an 11-year-old has done it” feels disingenuous at best. Using a child’s anecdote to soften the impact of a significant government mistake trivializes the issue and distracts from the consequences of the breach.
We’re not talking about accidentally texting the wrong person in a school group chat. We’re talking about high-level officials mistakenly including someone in a discussion tied to sensitive military operations. That’s not “relatable”—that’s a failure in operational security, and it deserves scrutiny, not spin.
We're also talking about high-level people illegally using a non-qualified app to avoid federal record keeping laws.
signalgate blunder
Can we fucking not add “-gate” to the end of everything that happens? It’s so overused that it diminishes the importance of actually-dangerous events like this one.
It all started with that Watergategate scandal.
What happens if we have a scandal about water?
Hydrogate
Rolls off the tongue better than aquagate would, that's for sure.
Avoiding hackneyed terms would literally be a Game Changer!
I can’t think of a time when I added the wrong person to a group chat. I’m sure it’s happened, but probably not in the past 10-15 years.
And my online chats are pretty low-stakes, so it’s not like I’m trying very hard.
A few friends of mine used to have a sms-based group chat we used for many years. One of those friends kept losing phones and getting new numbers. At some point one of his older numbers texted something to the tune of "what the fuck is this, why are you texting me?!". It turns out the old number had been reassigned.
then again, no state secrets were exchanged.
This article goes to great lengths to make it appear as if something hugely important really isn’t that big a deal. No, it’s not “relatable”. No, it isn’t “something we’ve all done”. This is treason.
They broke countless laws, protocols, and regulations that were put in place for good reason, by people who were clearly much more careful and intelligent than them. Still, even these stupid, arrogant assholes should have known better.
I will never read this MAGA apologist garbage again.
The secretary of defense is the one who decides what's classified as he is the head of the DoD.
With that being said I think it is kind of expected that the secretary of defense is not the point of weakness.
I'm not the first guy who fell in love with a girl he met in a restaurant...
who then turned out to be the daughter of a kidnapped scientist...
only to lose her to her childhood lover...
who she'd last seen on a deserted island...
and who turned out, 15 years later, to be the leader of the French underground.
That sounds like some Kojima level shit right there. Just needs a giant mech threatening a nuclear strike.
"Skeet Surfing" is my jam.
One of Mel Tormé's best songs.
We've all screwed up on a text message.
We haven't all chosen to use an insecure app for sensitive military operations to avoid foia requests to hide future treason charges and then screwed up a text message.
Sorry but you don't get to have something you do be "relatable" after you've tried to end somebody's career over a milder version of it.
It is relatable when it's your friends and family. When it's your work, especially secure work, there are no excuses. It's why organizations hire specialists to manage this sort of thing.
I don’t think we’ve all shared details of classified military operations in real time actually, that’s pretty much just a US government official thing.
That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal.
Up next: And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
The narcissist prayer, AKA Trump cabinet's mantra
Wow. USA today is complete Nazi propaganda good to know
What the every loving fuck is this shit?
"Omg, who hasn't accidentally broken the espionage act? Lol, omg. #relatable"
Jesus fucking Christ. This isn't the fucking "umm, actually" of War Thunder blunders either. This is actionable, real-time intelligence on an unsecured civilian app. This isn't some cutesy fuck up, this is big, bad shit.
Fucking hell
USA Today working overtime for its shareholders.
I'm sure my company's policies are nothing special and lots of companies have similar policies. I'm not allowed to do anything work related on my personal devices, only on the company issued and managed laptop and only through the company VPN. I'm also not allowed to discuss internal information on whatever app I want, just on company approved software, which is managed by the company's IT team. All software or other type of 3rd party used in the company has to first go through infosec approval.
This is a standard tech company not working on anything particularly sensitive for anyone other than potential competition and maybe shareholders. Definitely not anything involving national security.
So no, not relatable. This is how people get fired.
The CEOs are always allowed to break the rules though...
He should've just jumped in when they were all sending emojis
Might be relatable, but it ain’t excusable. Not even a little bit.
They all need to be impeached and jailed for this.
“So I used to be a transgender cabaret host in Berlin circa 1926. Haven’t we all?”