this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
484 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

21253 readers
1677 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45445434

Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Aren't these the people who freaked out about teenage pregnancies?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

They were angry about “single mothers” for decades, but that was a racist dog whistle.

If you’re all white, it’s all right.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They're Republicans. Of course they are concerned about teen pregnancies.

Who do you think is making them pragernet?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This entire administration is just pedos and perverts, isn't it?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Always was.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Not all of them. Here's the exhaustive list of those who aren't

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Brace yourselves for the pedophile parasite class campaign to justify their crimes

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Abstinence education is working! How are they not happy at their success?

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago

When I was born, the human population was around half of what it is now. If there ever was a time to organically decrease our population size, imo, it would be now.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The big concern is probably a decline in number of wage slaves. Children of teenage single moms are probably the best demographic for enslavement.

Next they will be decrying the decline in crime because it will harm the prison industrial complex. "We need more cops to arrest more people to keep us safe (from underpopulated prisons)."

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Researchers like Timothy Leary felt psychedelics could alter the fundamental personality structure or subjective value-system of an individual to great potential benefit. Beginning in 1961, he conducted experiments with prison inmates in an attempt to reduce recidivism with short, intense psychotherapy sessions. Participants were administered psilocybin during these sessions weeks apart with regular group therapy sessions in between.[24] Psychedelic therapy was also applied in a number of other specific patient populations including individuals with alcoholism, children with autism, and persons with terminal illness.[24]

Studies on medicinal applications of psychedelics ceased entirely in the United States when the Controlled Substances Act was passed in 1970. LSD and many other psychedelics were placed into the most restrictive "Schedule I" category by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration. Schedule I compounds are claimed to possess "a high potential for abuse and the potential to create severe psychological and/or physical dependence" and have "no currently accepted medical use",[28] effectively rendering them illegal to use in the United States for all purposes. Despite objections from the scientific community, authorized research into therapeutic applications of psychedelic drugs had been discontinued worldwide by the 1980s.

Can't have prisoners being reformed when they can be rented out as ditch-diggers for less than minimum wage. Just don't call it slavery.

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

I mean, they're right.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 115 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They're saying the quiet part out loud and why they're anti-abortion. The younger the better for a quick turnaround:

They need the poors to fight their wars and work on their factory floors.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I frequently just stand outside and look at the sky and think, yep, we weren't meant to work all day. We were meant to pick berries and mushrooms and take naps. I feel better about my station in life, knowing those oligarchs can never be satisfied, and all I have to do to feel right is take a walk outside.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I distinctly remember a time when boomers and talking heads would automatically respond to concerns about issues with the cost of having kids with:

"Don't have kids if you can't afford them."

"If you couldn't afford kids then you should've kept your legs closed."

"Don't expect a handout, nobody forced you to have kids."

"Healthcare and child care are too expensive? Tough shit snowflake, that's the free market! Work harder!"

"Why are my taxes paying for a public school when I don't even have any kids that go there?"

So nope, no sympathies. And no, you can't have your child sex brides, either.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

They are still saying this when it's convenient for them. The only consistent thing for such people is their cowardice in the face of responsibility.

[–] LilRed@lemmy.org 69 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Who the fuck wants to be having kids in this day and age anyway. Also why is it up to the underage teens to push out babies to keep the population up. Yeah let's put pressure on them to ruin their entire lives before they even get to live it. Love the American standards.

[–] Steve 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

The dude was conflating a number of things.
Teen birth rate is down the most, at 7% in 2025. 70% since 2005. Overall births are down slightly last year.
Overall we have a sub replacement birth rate of 1.53 per woman.

The last one is a societal problem. But just saying we need women to have more kids isn't a solution. You need to find out why people don't want to have as many kids. Which I would bet is almost entirely economic. Kids are a large long term expense. And if you're living paycheck to paycheck, with an uncertain financial future, a kid is a scary prospect.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I remember when teen pregnancy was considered bad and a sign of a decaying morality across the country. Now the same right wing moralizers are saying they need those teen moms again. But this time it's about money so they are noticeably quiet about morality.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Fucking lemongrab grade screeching of purity and abstinence for decades and then suddenly this

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Our masters want us to breed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago (6 children)

In a normal country, a doctor endorsing teen pregnancy would get their licence suspended.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Matt Gatez says 'I'm doing my part'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 33 points 1 week ago

I wonder how much breaking up the trump-epstein ring lowered the fertility rate of 15-19 year olds.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe if you just imprison fertile women and give them to rich couples to fuck and impregnate, that will solve the problem? You could call them handmaid's to distract from what they really are!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many times do conservatives have to prove that they're all pedophiles before the rest of us will learn?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

not a matter of "learning", it's a matter of "caring"

everyone knows by now this regime is full of pedophiles… but nobody gives enough of a fuck to do anything about it

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I'm not talking about the regime. I mean every last one of them.

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fertility rates are an issue for capitalism not humanity

[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Logistics at a certain point does not care what economic model you follow. Someone has to plant the crops and do all the other work that leads to people being fed, clothed, and housed under any system.

If your demographics are such that there are not enough people of working age to take care of those too old to work, you're going to have the kind of problems that led other human societies to kill their elders.

It'd be great if we could automate our way out of this, but I don't see that happening soon enough.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

15-19 yr olds aren’t supposed to be having kids.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hell some of them ARE kids

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

From my perspective, everyone under about 24 is still a kid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›