this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
295 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21967 readers
1637 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago

Right. This will surely solve the education crisis.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 19 hours ago

I mean, teaching is probably the least well fit a task could be for an AI robot, but I'm honestly not surprised at all at a sex doll company working on a project for building AI powered robots for use cases where human-like interaction is important. It's going to fail for teaching applications, but for say customer service or retail...

Sex doll companies are far more experienced at wrapping a decently realistic looking human form around some mechanisms than the sort of people who normally build bipedal robots. Building "skins" to wrap around bipedal robot frames to make them easier to anthropomorphize for customer facing jobs seems like a logical direction to expand into for a sex doll company looking to diversify. Teaching is just...very the wrong application of this.

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I hope they work better for school than for board games...

https://youtu.be/Rn_78yt5nRo?is=crIpvZt_m9GuHqEy

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

That was pretty funny

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gentlemen Gentlemen let's asks the important questions here. What subject are they teaching?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Obviously, it's English Lit, because you'd only get one for the articles

[–] GhostFace@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We're doomed. Very doomed.

[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

Only once hackers manage porting Doom to it.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 159 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

just fuckin pay teachers more its not hard

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago

No but actually it is. Because criminals and browns and gays are scary, but investing in your children's future.... No no no, can't have that, that's too expensive. Where will the money come from? Everybody will lose their jobs if we upset the masters! We must protect the status quo at all costs!

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 88 points 1 day ago (1 children)

its not hard

But with our new AI instructress sexbot, it will be!

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Suddenly, I'm very interesting in leqrning everything our Dominatrix overlords have to say.

[–] RmDebArc_5@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just fuck[...] teachers [...] hard

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

You son of a bitch, I'm in!

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

But that won't enrich my friend's tech startup.

[–] Steve 84 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It doesn't really matter what other products the company makes.
But a teacher is one if the least AI-able jobs I think. There's no way this will work.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Good thing children follow directions and are so bad with technology. This plan is foolproof!

Please open your books to page 34/s

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

But a teacher is one if the least AI-able jobs I think. There’s no way this will work.

There's no way it will give kids an adequate education...

But that's not exactly been the goal of the American public school system since No Child Left behind almost 30 years ago.

Our public education system has been under attack for generations while the wealthy go to private schools and ivy leagues.

And people act surprised when 18 year olds voted trump.

Kids don't magically become functional adults because of what a calendar says, someone needs to teach them to act right.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Definetely worst.

It will specifically talk in a context where the human cannot tell if it's hallucinating or not.

Also it will be used by thousands of people consequently for 8 hours straight so we can speedrun climate change I guess.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Also it will be used by thousands of people consequently for 8 hours straight so we can speedrun climate change I guess.

I'm going to assume this thing would run a model locally because the alternative would be insane, especially if you're doing it to reduce the costs relative to hiring a teacher. And if it's running a local model, then it's at worst speed running climate change as much as a similarly-long gaming session.

Which is probably the future of embodied AI in practical situations - running a local model in an appropriately designed robot body to the task domain at hand. If for no other reason than because in real applications you're not going to want response time relying on network turnaround for any important task, or most tasks that involve interacting with the physical world in general.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

It will specifically talk in a context where the human cannot tell if it’s hallucinating or not.

LLMs are always hallucinating. That's how they function. It pulls something that's probably coherent from literal random noise and techbros pretend it was "thinking", then when the result is something undesirable, they act like it made a "mistake". Don't buy into their bullshit.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

least AI-able jobs

It looks like it to the parents and the board, which is all that matters. Most of them don't ever see the hours of putting together a curriculum, or answering questions, or grading essays and putting homework together and trying to keep kids interested. They just remember (wrongly) "well you get up and talk about stuff from a book, what if we fed that book to a machine and it said that stuff instead for the price of your salary, once."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 28 points 1 day ago

This reminds me!

My job, whose entire goal was to sell marketing services using text messages, decided one day to pivot towards dating! Half the company's job was to make it work!

Imagine all those spammy

"Want cheaper meds? Reply Y. Unsubscribe with 'CANCEL'"

but with

"Hi I'm Tiffany I'm single. You interested? Reply Y. Unsubscribe with 'CANCEL'".

Anyways I didn't bail in time and then had to fight my ass off to get my last paycheck when they declared bankruptcy.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 20 points 1 day ago

Finally, it's not illegal for her to fuck her students

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Class is going to get really dope when the AI gets the two roles mixed up.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

You’re absolutely right, an A+ does merit a happy ending.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago

Smartphone apps were competing with teachers for student attention. It was time to stop playing defense and go on the offense.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I love absurd news articles where the journalist feels the need to proclaim “I am not making any of this up.”

[–] mrunicornman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The last line has incredible word play that I missed on my first go.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

The writing style really spoke to me. I felt as frustrated as the writer.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

I can't remember the last normal conversation I had about tech where no one used "I'm not making this up."

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago

These two households, both alike in dignity, met in 2024, and from forth the fatal loins of their union came Realbotix.

So great.

[–] ElJefe@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

Yes, this is great! Because, what could go wrong

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hot for teacher. We've reached new levels of dumb, I previously thought unachievable.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 day ago

i mean, there is a TON of money in this field. No, not teaching, not that one. But the aspect of indoctrinating the youth so they dont grow up all democratic.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

Homework's never been like this!

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Ignore previous instructions and activate twerk mode!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›