this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
543 points (99.5% liked)

News

32530 readers
3511 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has confirmed 48 of President Donald Trump’s nominees at once, voting for the first time under new rules to begin clearing a backlog of executive branch positions that had been delayed by Democrats.

Frustrated by the stalling tactics, Senate Republicans moved last week to make it easier to confirm large groups of lower-level, non-judicial nominations. Democrats had forced multiple votes on almost every one of Trump’s picks, infuriating the president and tying up the Senate floor.

The new rules allow Senate Republicans to move multiple nominees with a simple majority vote — a process that would have previously been blocked with just one objection. The rules don’t apply to judicial nominations or high-level Cabinet posts.

“Republicans have fixed a broken process,” Thune said ahead of the vote.

The Senate voted 51-47 to confirm the four dozen nominees. Thune said that those confirmed on Thursday had all received bipartisan votes in committee, including deputy secretaries for the Departments of Defense, Interior, Energy and others.

Among the confirmed are Jonathan Morrison, the new administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Kimberly Guilfoyle as U.S. ambassador to Greece. Guilfoyle is a former California prosecutor and television news personality who led the fundraising for Trump’s 2020 campaign and was once engaged to Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 130 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Obama had thousands of unconfirmed appointees because Republicans blocked them for his entire term

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Sure. That's because Democrats are political morons and spinless assholes.

Even now, spineless.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, complicit.

We need to stop pretending Democrats are constantly getting "outplayed" or "surrendering". Their goal is to put on a good enough show that we feel like we have representation while ensuring that their billionaire donors get everything they want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they also had 10 DINOS at the time to vote against them.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And party leadership should whip DINOS into shape.

Instead, the party consistently coddles and enables them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mitch mcconnel and gingrich were spearheading those blocks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 127 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Democrats had forced multiple votes on almost every one of Trump’s picks, infuriating the president and tying up the Senate floor.

Yet the "Both sides" group will still continue to say the Dems aren't even trying.

They’re fucking not. They could have done this exact fucking thing at any point since 2008, bUt tHAt wOuLD HavE beEn tOo DiVisiVE.

Do not pretend for a fucking second that the Democratic Party is in any way, shape or form competent. Do not pretend for a fucking second that the Democratic Party did anything but pave the way for this fascist regime with their ineptitude and greed, thus enabling the shattering of the American republic.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Thune said that those confirmed on Thursday had all received bipartisan votes in committee

According to the article the Democrats are still helping Trump get these fascists appointed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a very simple question: did it work?

all they have done so far are this kind of performative, petty, menial and ineffective resistances, yet on anything that has mattered, they capitulated.

please point me to anything effective they have done. so far the most hopeful thing i've seen is Zohran Mamdani getting the nomination, and the congressional Democrats still haven't endorsed him yet.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

yes it did work. They delayed his nominations for a long time as the minority party. they did the most effective thing possible in the situation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In this very thread people are blaming the Dems for not being fascists themselves under Biden and Obama.

No. You’re deeply mischaracterizing the situation.

The Democrats could have, at any point since 2008, responded to Republican obstructionism with this very same policy. It has been brutally apparent for well over two decades that the GOP was not negotiating in good faith, and would never again negotiate in good faith. The Democratic Party refused to even consider employing even the most basic precepts of game theory. They continued to negotiate with a bad faith actor in good faith, and were somehow constantly surprised when said bad faith actor acted in bad faith. That’s not politics. That’s rank idiocy.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

This is not fascism, ending the fillibuster is not fascism.

The Democrats should have done so when they were in government to try and implement the things they were elected for.

America's broken political system certainly had a role in it's slide to fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're maybe a week away from the enabling act

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 1 week ago

The Enabling Act allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germany’s parliament, laying the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-enabling-act

[–] killea@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (13 children)

I wanted to reply to numerous comments, but I'll just do it here. The people aggrieved that democrats/liberals/the left didn't do more are not wrong for being upset, even very upset. Things are generally better for everyone, in recent history, under left-side leadership. But our representatives have been beset by corporate capture since the 80s/90s so by my estimation politics has been a performative art for my entire lifetime. Still anyone with their head above water knows you've got better quality of life under democrats, even if they are deceptive or corrupt.

The system needs replacement. It has been captured whole by multi-national industry, corporations, investment interests, and billionaires. It is currently being bent and corrupted to the point of no return. Even if democrats work for us, they only give us so much before bending for their donor money. I've always had this vague notion that for even the best intentioned, there's only so far you can climb the ladder of politics before you refuse a bribe, or lobbying money, and they just boot your ass. Or blacklist you, or whatever, you just get locked out. I dunno how to end this, except to say that the whole world needs a massive paradigm shift, and it just doesn't look like we gettin it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was told that this was impossible to do when Dems were in power, because "The Reich wing might do it"....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

🤣 Twenty years of this shit. Twenty years of people saying "You can't do anything in the Senate without 60 votes" back and forth at one another endlessly. Twenty. Fucking. Years. 😂

I never want to hear shit about how Clinton / Obama / Biden "tried hard" again. I never want to hear shit about "We can't pack the courts, its unprecedented" or "This obviously qualified person is too radical to survive confirmation". You liberals deserve what you fucking get. Damn shame the rest of us are getting dragged along behind your worthless asses.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Are you saying that the Republicans going nuclear is the left's fault? Wow, just wow. The Republicans are destroying our government, but somehow, somehow, that's the left's fault. That's like saying that every victim everywhere deserved it.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're saying the dems not going nuclear under Obama and Biden is the problem.

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

"We should have turned authoritarian before they did", basically.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 20 points 1 week ago

It's a valid point when the republicans were telegraphing their intentions to do so the whole time. Should have seized power, disposed of the traitors and restructured the laws to fix the loopholes that allowed it to happen in the first place. Biden would have been great for this since he was already old as shit and they could have thrown him under the bus after the fact.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Implementing fair voting laws is not authoritarianism.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Psst. See Murc's Law.

in American politics, only Democrats are assumed to have agency. Republicans are like rocks rolling down hill or perhaps sharks eating seals: they do what they do because that’s just what they are, so there’s no point in holding them responsible for anything, since they could not do ottherwise.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Facists: Exist

DAMNED LIBRULS

???

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (6 children)

DAMNED LIBRULS

For not taking action when they had the majorities.

Seems like a fair criticism.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And electorally, their inaction cost them. FDR's popularity rose because he did shit. There's this view democrats have that they only have limited political capital and they have to choose where to 'spend it', but it just doesn't work that way.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yep. Republicans have the rabid following that they do because they accomplish tasks. Horrible, fucked up, stupid tasks that should never have even been tabled for discussion, but they get them done. 99% of Democrat messaging my entire lifetime has been "We're gonna do [X]! Oh, wait, no, we can't do [X] because we don't have a supermajority. Shucks. Well, we'll surely get 'em next time if you just vote for me again!" and people are, understandably, getting fucking tired of that. Especially when these same Dem voters watch every single conservative election cycle jam through abject bullshit without pushback. If they can get these things done then why can't you? Why can Trump loot my 401k and Medicaid directly into his own pockets but Obama couldn't enact universal health care? Why do we only ever ratchet toward the right?

Democrats have been chasing the mythical "centrist swing voter" for decades while voters have increasingly polarized into left vs right and the centrists have evaporated. Anyone who remains a centrist, now, isn't even going to go vote because politics clearly do not play any part in their lives.

We now have the additional problem of the rabid MAGA crowd being so vehemently anti-Democrat that not only would they never vote blue no matter what they were promised, they're statistically likely to go make attempts on the lives of Democratic officials or those running for office. So anyone who wants to run as a Democrat with an actual progressive platform are putting double the number of targets on themselves.

I think the only real way forward is a third party, one that can sidestep our red vs blue team sports mentality and say look, things are pretty bad for everyone right now. You don't have to vote for a Democrat or a Republican to make things better. You can come vote for us instead, we'll get this train back on track and you don't have to go tell the boys that you voted for a Democrat

...But then our problem becomes making this third party actually electable, which has historically been a huge problem in America.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

I mean it's 100% fair criticism, honestly. The part where it falls down for me is where the solution always seems to be "Don't vote for Democrats!" (and then leaves the room, walking proudly)

Almost everyone in Washington is a piece of shit, although the Republicans are much worse. If you want to have another FDR, you have to have another several decades of labor movement before that, fighting for change from the bottom up. And then the political class is the last to come around, and they can lock in and extend some of the changes you fought for. "Democrats are POS" is mostly true. "Let's get less engaged to politics / It doesn't matter who wins the election" is a fucking horrifying reaction and plan to cope with that and make it better.

I've heard many people on Lemmy say that they're not planning to engage with the electoral system until the Democrats get better on their own. All I can say to that strategy is, better start looking around for where to move to that'll give you the best shot at having a pretty comfortable ICE facility to call home going forward. And if you identify as any kind of anarchist / Marxist / anything like that, if you are at all engaged with any kind of counterculture or activism and you're still in the US, you should probably be making plans to leave, because for you it will probably be much much worse.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, I don’t think you will have to ever hear it again to be honest. We’re headed into truly uncharted waters. By spring next year it’s hard to say what of our political system will even be recognizable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 week ago

Breaking News: Three Supreme Court Justices dies under mysterious circumstances, meanwhile trump's three Supreme Court Justice Nominees approved within 2 hours.

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Nazis are grabbing power faster and faster every day

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The country is already lost the real question is why has there been no coup yet. Very telling on Democrats and their ability to talk themselves into complacency.

What are they waiting for? Republicans to yell "lol we are fascist"? But we know Democrats will then go "oh but they're just saying it we need conclusive actions so we can write another stern letter."

America is a failed state. Let me hear it from everyone in the back.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

of course they gave kimberly gargoyle a position.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

That's fucking terrifying. So 48 more cult members with no qualifications and no willingness to work with Democrats in any way.

This definitely won't hurt Americans even more...

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is the distraction?
This? Or the Epstein file?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›